Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Хоккейный аутизм

Channel

Хоккейный аутизм

@hockeyautism

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

398subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002035962156
TypeChannel
Username@hockeyautism
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hockeyautism

Growth

3984003997 August 2026 — 399 subscribers8 August 2026 — 399 subscribers15 August 2026 — 400 subscribers23 August 2026 — 398 subscribers31 August 2026 — 400 subscribers10 September 2026 — 398 subscribers7 August 202610 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 34 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 398–400 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 13:19398-2
31 Aug 2026, 08:05400+2
23 Aug 2026, 14:42398-2
15 Aug 2026, 18:58400+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:49399no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:32399first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 20 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 29s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

326 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥16951.8%
🤯3811.7%
👍247.36%
😁226.75%
206.13%
💯175.21%
custom 5343769430323112282133.99%
🤔103.07%
custom 524915701739372222161.84%
custom 546517880563722693751.53%
👎20.613%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 326 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
41
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
41
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hockeyautism. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 April 2026 to 12 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC174 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

А вас раздражает подобная риторика?

  1. Да, в жизни хватает69%
  2. Нет, я люблю такой язык31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥4

12 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC180 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как игнорировать муху над ухом? Любой хоккеист или любитель хоккея уверен, что его любимый спорт находится вне политики. А я, например, уверен, что «Северсталь» возьмет кубок Гагарина. Все мы прекрасно понимаем, что в любой точке мира спортсмены являются политическими акторами так или иначе, общество ведь нужно консолидировать, а на фоне хоккея дружат миллионы. Где-то хоккеисты поддержат государственный флешмоб, гд

🔥14

17 Jun 2026, 12:04 UTC310 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Жизнь имитирует жизнь Я прикоснулся к хоккейным медиа ещё в 2015/2016 году. На тот момент в США был известным Nasher61, который снимал хоккей на GoPro, а еще играл в него на приставке и делал какие-то распаковки. Помимо Nasher61, я поглядывал за всякими Jeremy Coach. Все хоккейные проекты тогда сводились к гайдам по финтам, играм в хоккей и распаковкам. Тогда еще не было возможным снимать день с какой-то звездой ЛИ

🔥171

17 Jun 2026, 10:47 UTC269 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

До выхода поста остается чуть больше часа, поэтому я заранее выкатил дисклеймер, а он сегодня очень пригодится Дисклеймер: это мой субъективный взгляд. Я не претендую на истину в последней инстанции и не жду всеобщего согласия. Моя цель — не убедить вас мыслить так же, а лишь чётко изложить свою позицию для тех, кому интересно в ней разобраться.

👍12🔥2

17 Jun 2026, 04:03 UTC274 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня я хочу с вами поговорить Включайте уведомления, один из масштабных и серьезных постов выйдет в 15:00 по МСК

🔥14custom 54651788056372269374

15 Jun 2026, 03:00 UTC298 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Качать гениев!

🔥19custom 534376943032311228262👍1

14 Jun 2026, 14:04 UTC298 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как вам финал? Я несколько лет был уверен в том, что «Каролина» до боли однообразна и выше финала конференции им не прыгнуть. Как же я удивился в этом финале, «Каролина» стала совсем другой, она умеет играть в интересный хоккей. Я ожидал увидеть 3:2 в пользу «Вегаса», но не в пользу «Каролины». Вообще, я был уверен в том, что «неидеальный» результат требует сиюминутных перемен и постоянно переносил эти предрассуд

🔥16custom 53437694303231122823👍1

26 May 2026, 18:35 UTC350 views42 reactions41 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Разговор, от которого я не хочу убегать За два года своего существования «Хоккейный аутизм» пережил многое. Мы с вами видели кринжовое начало канала, унижение КХЛ, даже дошли до полноценных карточек игроков, которые набирали пару тысяч просмотров в тиктоке. Со временем я развивался и начал рассказывать о дискурсе, писал простые анализы речей, разбирал тактические моменты и горел хоккеем. Но что стояло за этим? Сме

🤯22🔥11🤔5custom 52491570173937222213custom 54651788056372269371

26 May 2026, 12:15 UTC300 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Почему «Анахайм» создал «Вегасу» больше проблем, чем «Колорадо»? Если вы вспомните «Анахайм» в регулярке, то в плей-офф они уже были другой командой. «Анахайм» часто действовал нелогично и это было их главным оружием. Утята сами не понимали что им делать против «Вегаса», попросту модель их игры ещё не была обкатана в плей-офф, поэтому они зацепили два матча. Банально, но Торторелле было тяжелее готовиться к «Анахай

🔥10

22 May 2026, 03:09 UTC315 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Рискну предположить, что «Монреаль» вдоль и поперек изучил неизменную «Каролину» Из года в год пишу, что «Каролина» мало в чем меняется. Да, играют системно и дисциплинированно, но я верю в то, что системные команды переигрываются более креативными.

11custom 53437694303231122824👍3🔥1

16 May 2026, 16:52 UTC452 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему я перестал болеть за одну команду? Долгие 7 лет я болел за «Мейпл Лифс», но потом переходный возраст закончился, вечная депрессия ушла и я стал их воспринимать как «рофло-команду». Так вот, шаг этот вполне себе открыл другой хоккей, так, например, я начал наблюдать за «Шаркс», «Утятками», «Баффало». Оказалось, что плей-офф не заканчивается на 1/100, а в финале играют неплохие ребята. В общем, я стал наслаж

🔥24🤔3

5 May 2026, 04:20 UTC477 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ладно, парни, играйте проще 😁

😁21custom 52491570173937222213

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hockeyautism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTCAnonymous Poll35 voters

А вас раздражает подобная риторика?

  1. Да, в жизни хватает69%
  2. Нет, я люблю такой язык31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Apr 2026, 06:14 UTCAnonymous Poll86 voters

Вегас или Юта?

  1. Вегас59%
  2. Юта42%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 12 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хоккейный аутизм” (@hockeyautism), 398 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hockeyautism.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.