Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Хоккей Морозова

Channel

Хоккей Морозова

@hockey_owl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

404subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001850942180
TypeChannel
Username@hockey_owl
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hockey_owl

Growth

401404402.56 August 2026 — 401 subscribers6 August 2026 — 401 subscribers12 August 2026 — 404 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 401–404 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:59404+3
6 Aug 2026, 19:45401no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:03401first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.4%
avg views ÷ 404 subscribers
Avg views / post
155
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held16 (29 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,484
Reactions total161
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

161 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁5433.5%
3924.2%
🔥3622.4%
💔159.32%
74.35%
🏆74.35%
🌭31.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC52 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Нам до конца недели обещали развязку эпопеи Евгения Кузнецова. Как думаете, будет завтра объявление? И если да, то какое? Состоится релиз долгожданного проекта Black White Redemption 🚜, или его вновь отложат на неопределённый срок, выпустив вместо него увлекательное приключение Syberia ❄️? 💬 Подпишись на Морозова

😁2🏆1

5 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC97 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ожидание: ИИ отнимет работу у творческих людей ✍️ Реальность: ИИ отнимает работу у трудяг на замбони 🚜 Фирма WM Ice Technics в своём ассорименте имеет ледозаливочные машины, оснащённые системой автономной работы Autopilot 3D. Помимо классического управления, они могут самостоятельно гонять по льду, анализировать площадку и делать гладенько. Сообщается, что подобный аппарат уже работает на катке в городке Сентенниал

🔥4😁2

4 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC126 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Друзья случайно в буккроссинге нашли старые хоккейные справочники-календари. Что мы узнали из них? Ну, в сезоне 1974/1975 сетуют, что снизился класс игры у именитых клубов, а в сезоне 1987/1988 ругают ИИХФ. Ничто не ново под луной. А вот что мне реально понравилось: «Когда команда долго не выигрывает, это означает, что надо делать перестановки. Сегодня никто не знает этого лучше, чем Тед Харрис и Гарри Бергман. Эти

😁53🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC127 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Рубрика «ни дня без сомнительного ребрендинга» сегодня с новостями из Белоруссии: солигорский «Шахтер» представил новый логотип. Мне всегда нравится их роскошный крот, пусть концепцией он и напоминал старого медведя «Трактора». Эта хищная мордочка, эти красные глазёнки, эта каска — клёво же! У меня даже футболка с этим лого когда-то была 😬 Теперь же у клуба… Ну… Шахтёр. Мда. 💬 Подпишись на Морозова

5💔4🏆1

3 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC140 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Видели уже это чудесное флэш-интервью с Михаилом Бучкиным из оршанского «Локомотива»? 🚂 Золотой фонд цитат Бучкина из других интервью: «Пришел с обеда, книжечку почитал. «Слово и дело», исторический роман про Российскую империю. Почитал, пришел сюда, а здесь хоккей» «Возможно, православная борода тренера ему (вратарю соперника) как-то помогает, да и всей команде. Заговоренный какой-то. Ну завтра у нас выходной, я

😁105🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC191 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Гол Эпштейна за «Амурских Тигров» 🐯 на предсезонке? Сохраняем в файлы! 😬 💬 Подпишись на Морозова

😁91

3 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC154 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#вернисаж Хоккей можно найти даже в запасниках Третьяковской галереи. Вот это — автолитография Ильи Кулешова «Хоккей» 1929 года. Да, в те годы в СССР под хоккеем в первую очередь подразумевали бенди, но мне кажется, изображённая здесь игра похожа и на буржуазный канадский хоккей с шайбой. 💬 Подпишись на Морозова

🔥85🏆3

2 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC202 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Во время этой отвратительной московской жары приятно осознавать, что хотя бы в Аргентине прохладно 🥵 В Ушуайе хорошо ❄️ 💬 Подпишись на Морозова

7🔥63

2 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC196 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

На неделе в Пензе прошёл детский хоккейный турнир под знамёнами производителя индейки. И вроде сначала звучит забавно, но ведь хорошая коммерческая практика. Бренд дал денег, пацаны и девчонки из разных регионов в хоккей (даже из Ессентуков, прикиньте, я вот не знал, что там есть хоккей) поиграли и Александра Овечкина повидали, плохо что ли? Да как будто хорошо! Ну и талисман у турнира великий, конечно. Даже Алекса

5🔥4🌭1

1 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC203 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Голевая сирена? А может, лучше ГОЛЕВОЕ ЧУЧЕЛО ВОЛКА? 🐺 У молодёжной команды «Садбери Вулвз» из хоккейной лиги Онтарио есть шикарная упоротая традиция. Когда хозяева забивают, над площадкой прокатывается подвешенное на тросе чучело волка. Шедевр таксидермии клубу подарили журналисты местной газеты ещё в начале 1950-х. Несколько лет чучело просто стояло в раздевалке, пока управляющий арены не решил, что шерстяной дол

😁92🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @hockey_owl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 120,448 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хоккей Морозова” (@hockey_owl), 404 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hockey_owl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.