5 measurements spanning 17 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 82–84 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 14:38
83
-1
16 Aug 2026, 20:55
84
+1
9 Aug 2026, 17:46
83
no change
8 Aug 2026, 16:02
83
+1
7 Aug 2026, 15:50
82
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
74.5%
avg views ÷ 83 subscribers
Avg views / post
61.8
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
10 (3 August 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
309
Reactions total
57
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
37s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
107 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5242325953513803848
32
29.9%
custom 5240481432563900338
31
29.0%
custom 5339263846420859957
20
18.7%
custom 5431892547100242397
11
10.3%
custom 5402149709596861623
7
6.54%
custom 5341644619807476274
6
5.61%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем привет! Показываю вашему вниманию вложения со вчерашнего дня! Они во вложении! Была прекрасна как ангел + ела протеиновую бурмалду + посещала свидание с мужчиной и игралась с Бритиш бульдогом, будто бы я не наигралась с ним в школьные годы…(это шутка про олимпиаду по английскому Британский Бульдог)
Также по предыдущему посту я увидела, что 7 человек отметились, что у них стресс.. побалуйте же себя комментами с о…
Всем привет! Минувший день собрал в себя два интересных события: первый день месячных + посещение тайского массажа. Ведь каждая женщина знает, что в первый день такого деликатного периода её жизни, прямо показано, когда по твоему телу буквально ногами ходит другой человек 😍😍
Не знаю, чем я думала, но Бог с ним.. Еще я впервые проехала 20км на велосипеде в платье.. надеюсь, я была похожа на загадочную девушку из пинте…
Сижу в своем привычном месте для привала, перед глазами очень красивый вид.. захотелось сфоткать, потом подумала, что не планирую ничего выкладывать, смысл тогда фоткать.. Потом подумала, что эта мысль делает меня зависимой от соц сетей.. сфоткала.. ну и выложу че)))))
Сегодня грустный день, друзья. Нужно отвезти велосипед на первое ТО после 100км, не хочу разлучаться с ним… помянем его с помощью фото моего стильного завтрака, видео с роботом и поиском моего правого наушника.
Всем привет.. такой сегодня день.. песня дня во вложении. Что думаете? Мне все еще нельзя много думать..
https://youtu.be/zoMYU_nOGNg?si=e0mhMSf0-M8xkQVi
🤪 — песня топ фотки топ
🤩 — май дрим из ту флай
💓 — овер зе рейнбоу соу хай
Всем спасибо за активное участие в опросе! Не могу ничего придумать лучше, чем съесть кусок плавленного сыра, который нашла у себя в сумке в честь вашего здоровья!
Мое личное мнение: это кринж и реальный позор + вульгарная простота. Решила задать этот вопрос сюда, ибо не впервые получаю сей вопрос на первый порах общения..
Панедельник би лайк. Начала новую книгу под названием «Сестра Керри» Драйзера. Все таки солидная у мужчины фамилия, почему-то любая книга кажется крутой чисто из-за этой фамилии… Но книга топ.. я люблю такое.. а вы..?
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @hobbyhorsing98. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Если при знакомстве мужчина задаёт вопрос «ты тактильная?» это кринж?
Кринж79%
Не кринж18%
Свой вариант в коментах4%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Надя 🌱📈” (@hobbyhorsing98), 83 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hobbyhorsing98.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
