3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 882–883 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 20:45
883
+1
8 Aug 2026, 01:06
882
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:31
882
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 883 subscribers
Avg views / post
115
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
18 (25 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
2,065
Reactions total
79
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 01:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 54m
Average length
7m 08s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
79 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
26
32.9%
🔥
17
21.5%
🤔
6
7.59%
👀
5
6.33%
👏
5
6.33%
🤯
5
6.33%
❤
4
5.06%
😱
4
5.06%
🙏
4
5.06%
😡
2
2.53%
😁
1
1.27%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Debido a que, en promedio, la pelvis femenina es más ancha, el fémur suele inclinarse más hacia adentro desde la cadera hasta la rodilla (mayor ángulo Q). Como consecuencia, al caminar las mujeres tienden a colocar los pies más cerca de una línea central imaginaria, dando la impresión de que caminan "en línea recta" o cruzando ligeramente un pie delante del otro.
Por el contrario, los hombres suelen tener:
- Pelvis …
Explicación sobre qué es el Dióxido de Cloro (CDS) y cuáles son sus beneficios en la salud de las personas.
A diferencia de un antibiótico que funciona por "envenena- miento", el dióxido de cloro (CIO₂) funciona por "oxidación" Es decir: combustión
Es el mismo mecanismo que el cuerpo y su sistema de defensa inmu-nológica utiliza: la oxidación. Sobre todo en los fagocitos, este sistema funciona desde hace millones d…
"La mayoría de los hallazgos publicados son falsos": el cardiólogo que dejó de creerle a las revistas médicas
Decilo en voz alta en un hospital y te miran como si estuvieras delirando. Pero es el título de un paper.
Lo firmó John Ioannidis en PLoS Medicine, 2005. Hoy es profesor en Stanford, uno de los científicos más citados del mundo con más de 700 mil citas, y el hombre que dirige el ranking de científicos más c…
¿DÓNDE ESTÁN TODOS LOS PASAJEROS DEL CRUCERO DEL HANTAVIRUS?
¿Recuerdas el crucero golpeado por un brote mortal de hantavirus a principios de este año?
Decenas de pasajeros bajaron del barco antes de que el brote siquiera se confirmara.
Otros fueron sacados discretamente en vuelos bajo una fuerte seguridad.
Cuando finalmente desembarcaron en España, personas con trajes completos de protección contra materiales pe…
¡ESTO VA A REVOLUCIONAR INTERNET!
Elon Musk acaba de revelar la noticia más impactante de Neuralink:
“En los próximos 6 a 12 meses, implantaremos los primeros dispositivos de visión. Incluso si eres completamente ciego de nacimiento, escribiremos directamente en tu corteza visual… y podrás ver”.
“Y esto es solo el principio. A largo plazo, tendrás resolución ultra alta definición y superpoderes reales: verás en in…
Una empresa estadounidense está construyendo un robot humanoide que se asemeja al demonio Baal, diseñado para entrar en incendios forestales, zonas tóxicas, escombros y otros entornos demasiado peligrosos para los humanos.
El sistema combina un torso humanoide con una plataforma de movilidad cuadrúpeda y se describe como seguro y eficaz.
De la mitología a la realidad | Así es 'Threehalves', el robot centauro de 2 m…
Este es un escáner de libros automático Treventus ScanRobot, diseñado para la digitalización masiva.El dispositivo utiliza una cuna en forma de V de 60° para escanear libros encuadernados sin dañarlos.Puede escanear hasta 2,500 páginas por hora utilizando tecnología de captura de prisma.
PD: Están destruyendo libros y escaneando su contenido para entrenar modelos de IA…
Y así comienza…
Ejecutivo de Bayer
lo admite abiertamente...
"Hubiéramos tenido una tasa de RECHAZO del 95% si le hubiéramos dicho a la gente que era TERAPIA GÉNICA... así que en su lugar los llamamos 'vacunas'"...
Esto no es una teoría de la conspiración, fuiste engañado por tu gobierno.
Nos dijeron que era una «teoría de la conspiración».
Ahora, las imágenes microscópicas están disponibles.
- Miles de millones de nanopartículas de óxido de grafeno.
- Estructuras autoensamblables
descubiertas en las vacunas contra la COVID-19.
- No menos de 55 sustancias no declaradas,
algunas de las cuales se sabe que son letales.
Nos enfrentamos a una organización que ha permitido la comisión de crímenes de le…
Ivar Giaever, Premio Nobel, dice en voz alta lo que los medios y los políticos nos prohíben pensar:
👉 El cambio climático es un ENGAÑO. 👉 El CO2 es alimento para las plantas, no veneno. 👉 Todo es una invención de las élites para controlar a la gente, gravar a los trabajadores e imponer su agenda.
Mientras Macron, la UE y los ecologistas de sillón nos obligan a pagar impuestos al carbono, destruyen nuestras fábricas…
👍4
Signed Hnodespierta😎🍿
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hnodespierta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@hnodespierta named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@stuckelberger named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HnoDespierta” (@hnodespierta), 883 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hnodespierta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
