Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for hleb 🍞

Channel

hleb 🍞

@hleeeeeeebb

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

298subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001871447270
TypeChannel
Username@hleeeeeeebb
Created22 January 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hleeeeeeebb

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

298303300.57 August 2026 — 303 subscribers8 August 2026 — 303 subscribers15 August 2026 — 301 subscribers24 August 2026 — 299 subscribers31 August 2026 — 300 subscribers9 September 2026 — 298 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 297–304 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 19:40298-2
31 Aug 2026, 07:17300+1
24 Aug 2026, 04:18299-2
15 Aug 2026, 15:55301-2
8 Aug 2026, 08:01303no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:51303first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 6 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

447 reactions across 15 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7516.8%
🔥7516.8%
7416.6%
🕊5311.9%
👏5211.6%
👾316.94%
💘245.37%
❤‍🔥194.25%
🐳173.80%
🥰92.01%
👀71.57%
👍40.895%
🎄20.447%
🌚10.224%
🎉10.224%
😁10.224%
🤔10.224%
🦄10.224%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 447 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2025 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hleeeeeeebb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 May 2025 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 16:35 UTC102 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

— нарисовала что-то красивое... пока на этом всё, извините

🔥176🕊5💘2

27 Apr 2026, 19:52 UTC264 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

делаю что-то грандиозное... наверное....... по сути это будет показ слайдов под атмосферную музыку и попыткой в монтаж чтобы оживить картинку. хочу сделать атмосферу какой-то ?киношности? не знаю, что из этого выйдет, но если доделаю будет прикольно сил мне и терпения 🫠

17👀7💘2🕊21🔥1🦄1

18 Feb 2026, 18:20 UTC413 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— подведу итог рисования 24 часа (по факту немного меньше... мы просто уже старенькие чтобы не спать сутки) Итог: сначала было весело, потом не очень... Где-то к 6-ти часам утра мозг уже не мог сгенерировать что-то. Стилус по планшету сам гулял. Всего я сделала 5 скетчей, половина из них покрашенные. Рассчитывала на большее количество, но я забыла учесть, что даже на чистый набросок у меня уходит много времени. В ц

12🕊73🐳1

17 Feb 2026, 10:37 UTC363 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

— сегодня рисую с братанами 24 часа... можете пожелать нам удачи счёт почеркушек: 1/???

🔥1363🕊2🐳1💘1

8 Jan 2026, 08:04 UTC459 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— народ, вопрос вселенского масштаба! я уже давно рассуждаю на эту тему, и решила, что лучше всё-таки спросить напрямую у аудитории. вы ведь основные потребители контента здесь. поэтому попрошу максимальный актив под постом, чтобы раз и навсегда решить эту проблему ! внимание вопрос : как вы отнесётесь, если я буду переодически выкладывать сюда своих адоптов? прямо аукционами. на фандомные картиночки пока сил нет, а

14👏7🐳6💘2🤔1

31 Dec 2025, 17:59 UTC400 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— Друзья, всех с Новым годом! Я конечно отправляю у себя ровно в 00:00, может у кого-то уже наступил или вот-вот наступит! Спасибо, что остаётесь со мной очередной год и спасибо тем, кто пришёл сюда в этом году. Я хотела приготовить вам подарок к 31-му, но быстро отрисовать не получилось, поэтому ожидайте дроп в первых числах (за выходные точно закончу) Ещё раз всех с Новым годом. Поднимаем бокалы в комментариях 🥂🥂🥂🥂

21🔥7🐳1👏1💘1

18 Nov 2025, 19:02 UTC528 views51 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

— опа! я в шоке.... ребут винкс выглядит многообещающе #hleb_hazbinhotel

👾27🔥12💘63🐳1🕊1😁1

11 Nov 2025, 11:24 UTC541 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

сил хватило на малое... вот накалякала по бырому свою поняху из пт с минимальным знанием анатомии, но было очень интересно! ещё бы на работе интернет был, чтобы референсы найти.... у нас теперь это привилегия симпатично получилось и ладно! #hleb_ponytown

👏18❤‍🔥6🕊421🐳1👾1💘1

1 Oct 2025, 16:39 UTC604 views46 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

— а, эм... обожаю свои импульсивные хотелки....... #hleb_carsssssssssss

👏19❤‍🔥13🔥6👾31🌚1🎉1💘1

22 Sept 2025, 18:07 UTC590 views49 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

— недавно посмотрела пилот к новому мульту от студии Глитч "Рыцари Гвиневры" меня очень впечатлил данный проект, поэтому решила сделать иллюстрацию. вот, делюсь промежуточным результатом #hleb_рыцаригвиневры

30🥰5👍4🔥4🐳2🕊21💘1

18 Sept 2025, 07:45 UTC555 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— Только сейчас заметила, кто-то одарил мои посты звёздами! Спасибо большое человечку за поддержку ❤️ А остальные могут поддержать канал голосами Ещё раз всем спасибо, что остаётесь со мной

💘632

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @hleeeeeeebb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 May 2025, 06:38 UTCAnonymous Poll64 voters

Голосуем

  1. 113%
  2. 214%
  3. 316%
  4. 417%
  5. 541%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2025 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“hleb 🍞” (@hleeeeeeebb), 298 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hleeeeeeebb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.