Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 吊哥推广引流

Channel

吊哥推广引流

@hldbxc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry

999subscribers

-386 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002970707632
TypeChannel
Username@hldbxc
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hldbxc

Growth

9991,3851,1927 August 2026 — 1,385 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,385 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,372 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,366 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,359 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,349 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,343 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,341 subscribers29 August 2026 — 999 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net -386. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 941–1,443 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 21:18999-342
26 Aug 2026, 13:061,341-2
23 Aug 2026, 09:061,343-6
20 Aug 2026, 03:531,349-10
17 Aug 2026, 11:441,359-7
13 Aug 2026, 16:471,366-6
10 Aug 2026, 17:411,372-13
7 Aug 2026, 22:181,385no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:561,385first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.3%
avg views ÷ 999 subscribers
Avg views / post
193
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held5 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total966
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC29 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

相信是你兄弟亲戚才放心用你的app,你说多少也是给你90%,然后开始用的app前一天还正常打粉的不多,用了三四天群里两三个小时不回复,后台也是只给开了一个下级后台,加白功能都没有,问你的客服和傻逼一样,他自己都不懂还叫自己我们的人自己去摸索,很多功能都没开,摸索什么,只用了四五天就一直催尾款,问题都解决不了怎么打钱,然后你们直接不回复,md钱都给了90%差三千u能跑了还是怎么了,粉都打了几万u的,差你这点吗,现在只用了10天,你们群都退了,叫你来现场也不来,现在直接不回复,现在只有一个要求把该退的钱退了,我们自己要弄新的app也是要给钱的, (你技术群也不拉,叫你截图和技术对接的,你也不截图,心里有鬼是吧,群里对接的 客服是你找过来的缅华,然后你自己全部吃了) 下次就是报照片,报你现在的地址,都是在亚太的不要玩花招,想找你叫军方的进去就能找到了 期限今天内解决掉

7 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC142 viewsread 7 August 2026

公安局门口拉横幅可以找10个人放鞭炮效果面子给足88u直接出➕推广引流来兄弟们吊哥信誉不多说要的私信我鸽子死妈

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @hldbxc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“吊哥推广引流” (@hldbxc), 999 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hldbxc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.