The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 8 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.

Channel
選舉觀察計劃資訊頻道
@hkeop
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
105subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001401438333 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hkeop |
| Created | 24 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hkeop |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 02:38 | 105 | -1 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 106 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 107 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 108 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 109 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 110 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 111 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 111 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 13 May 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Our webpage is unavailable for the time being. Please do not try to access it for fear of hackers trying to steal users’ information from it. 選舉觀察計劃網站目前未能察看或使用,請不要嘗試登入,以免被不明人士盜取個人資料。
gistration and Electoral Office to review its administrative procedures to enhance transparency and efficiency with respect to applications to do exit polls. 5. The Electoral Affairs Commission and the Registration and Electoral Office should critically access the procedures designed to regulate the transfer of ballot boxes from the polling stations to the Central Counting Station, and to strengthen the training …
--Executive Summary-- The Hong Kong Election Observation Project (EOP) is an independent scholarly platform based in civil society and the academia of Hong Kong. Its mission is to observe and evaluate local electoral management and processes, innovate networks of citywide election observation to monitor electoral integrity, and to promote election observation in the city. The goals of EOP are to observe the differen…
s were basically the same. None of the messages mentioned ‘democracy’ or ‘democratic development’. From the perspective of electioneering, the overall quality of electoral competition was compromised when candidates were seen to have avoided politically sensitive topics throughout their campaigns and to present almost identical policy platforms from subsector to subsector. Against this background, the EC elections be…
【2021 Election Committee Subsector Election Ordinary Election Observation Report】 ---------------------------- ************************ Download Full Report:https://bit.ly/3BRqR8c Download Executive Summary: https://bit.ly/3naNuyt ************************ ----------------------------
【2021年選舉委員會界別分組一般選舉(2021年9月19日)觀察報告】 ------------------------------------ - 摘要- 「選舉觀察計劃」乃獨立的民間學術平台,旨在全面檢視整個選舉過程,開發支援全港選舉觀察網絡,從而讓公民社會得以監察香港選舉過程,推動本地選舉觀察發展。本計劃的目標是根據國際標準和守則--包括但不限於《世界人權宣言》、《公民及政治權利國際公約》、《國際選舉觀察工作原則宣言》--並按照權威學術研究和海外選舉觀察的豐富實踐經驗,指出今次選舉哪些環節出現問題或與國際標準有異,並研究成因,提出改革建議,帶動公眾關心和肯定選舉公正對建設民主至關重要。 「選舉觀察計劃」完成對2021年選舉委員會界別分組選舉進行的觀察活動。20名觀察人員在較早前接受一次密集的培訓後分派到5個投票站,就投票流程、秩序、候選人及選民的活動採用定量及定質的資料蒐集。同時,我們特別在投票日嘗試更有系統地了解…
【2021年選舉委員會界別分組一般選舉(2021年9月19日)觀察報告】 ----------------------------------- ****************************** 報告全文下載:https://bit.ly/3BRqR8c ****************************** -----------------------------------
選舉觀察計劃日前(2021年9月19日)於各票站外除了觀察票站外整體運作,亦分別向投票人及選民提出進行問卷調查的邀請。 在投票進行的9小時內,我們的觀察員共接觸550人(市民:408人; 選民:142人)。當中,28.9%的市民及31%的投票人願意接受我們的邀請。 今日首先公佈一個簡單統計,比較兩個群組對選舉代表性的觀感: 「你認為是次選委會選舉能夠代表民意嗎?請由 1 至 10 的量尺中選取最合適的數字。1 代表完全不能夠代表民意,10 代表完全能夠代表民意。」 如圖所示,兩組受訪對象對今次選舉的代表性存在明顯分別。 首先,市民回應的平均分為3.67,而有份投票的選民的則為6.41。 而最明顯的分別就回答「不合格」分數(1-5分)比率的市民更高達78%,認為是次選舉代表性「合格」(6-10分)的則只有21%,更有超過三成市民只給最低的1分。相反,有61.4%投票人認為代表性「合格」、但亦有超過二成選民只給予5分或以下…
Photo, posted without a caption
【選舉觀察計劃就就選舉委員會界別分組選舉的聲明】 選舉觀察計劃今天(2021年9月19日)完成對選舉委員會界別分組選舉進行的觀察活動。 20名觀察人員在較早前接受一次密集的培訓後分派到5個投票站,就投票流程、秩序、候選人及選民的活動採用定量及定質的資料蒐集。同時,我們特別在投票日嘗試更有系統地了解市民、選民及候選人對是次選舉的意見。 整體而言,雖然政府多番迴避選舉委員會代表性的問題,事實上在新的選舉安排下,選民資格已被大幅收窄,而各界別引入不是競選的當然委員,及經協調後大部份界別出現自動當選的現象,再加上資格審查制度下民主派已經絕跡,都足以解釋今日的選舉缺乏市民關注的焦點,其過程及結果皆無助處理長期困擾香港管治的認受性問題。 在這個背景下,今天的選舉出現高度同質性,而在缺乏候選團隊之間互相監督的情況下,我們發現大量候選人和他們的助選團人員在禁止拉票區及票站所在的建築物內歡迎選民、拜票、謝票及隨意拍照留念。 選舉事務處應…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hkeop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“選舉觀察計劃資訊頻道” (@hkeop), 105 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hkeop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.