Photo, posted without a caption
❤21😢7💯1
Signed Vadim Glazkov

Channel
@hiveminded
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,866subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001242573402 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hiveminded |
| Description | Про менеджмент, продукты, предпринимательство и работу СЕО — такая вот CEO-оптимизация. Vadim Glazkov, @vadim_glazkov |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hiveminded |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 1,866 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 1,866 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 28 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
338 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 164 | 48.5% | |
| 🔥 | 99 | 29.3% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 3.55% | |
| 🫡 | 9 | 2.66% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 2.37% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 2.37% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 2.07% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 2.07% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 2.07% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 1.48% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 1.18% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 0.888% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.888% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.296% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.296% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 338reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2025 to 28 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hiveminded. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 December 2025 to 28 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqwDv5C7 | 1 | 22 January 2026 | 22 January 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2025 to 28 March 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤21😢7💯1
Signed Vadim Glazkov
Можно не печатать во время интервью Все годы, что я преподаю проведение исследований, я говорил одно и то же: «Печатайте во время интервью. Осваивайте десятипальцевый слепой набор. Делайте конспекты прямо в процессе». Почему? Потому что записи интервью никто не переслушивал. После интервью никто не выделял себе время, чтобы сесть и законспектировать заметки. Результаты забывались, терялись — и половина работы уходи…
❤12👍2
Signed Vadim Glazkov
Инструменты больше не проблема Гайд интервью напишет ChatGPT. Фреймворк JTBD загрузишь в контекстное окно. Шаблон для выводов скачаешь с Notion. Презентацию с результатами сделает Claude Code с MCP к Figma. Знание инструментов перестало быть проблемой — ИИ достаточно одного документа с контекстом, и он выдаст рабочий результат. Проблема в экзекьюшене. Как, блин, написать 20 емейлов респондентам. Как, блин, вытащить…
❤7🔥7🫡4
Signed Vadim Glazkov
2й поток интенсива по продуктовому исследованию Изучили касдев, JTBD, поняли важность общения с клиентом, но ни одного интервью не проведено? Я провожу интенсив, на котором участники сделают исследование своими руками от начала до конца, от постановки задачи до выводов. Моя задача — провести вас по всему циклу, дать уверенности и дисциплины, и уберечь от граблей. Старт: 23 марта За две недели в группе из 5-10 чело…
❤8🔥7🎉2
Signed Vadim Glazkov
Что делать, чтобы угнаться за ИИ в сфере исследований 1. Знайте, что ИИ-симуляции интервью или синтетические респонденты — это не просто попросить ChatGPT прикинуться моим респондентом. Это мультиагентная система, в которой, помимо генерации самих персон, нужно сделать их достаточно разнообразными, отфильтровать от фантазий LLM, валидировать результаты. А ещё обучить их на реальных интервью (вот что можно забрать из…
❤9👍3🔥3
Signed Vadim Glazkov
— У вас респонденты натуральные? — Нет, синтетика 80%. Сейчас много надежд на синтетических респондентов. Они могут дать ебейшую скорость и дешевизну исследований. Особенно хочется ускорить исследования для новых или сложных рынков с малодоступными респондентами. Например, чтобы найти 10 ЛПРов в B2B исследовании, может уйти 2-3 месяца и по $700 за интервью на каждого. Мы совершенно точно придём в точку, где появятс…
❤12🔥6👏3🫡1
Signed Vadim Glazkov
Кайфанул от своего интенсива Собралась суперская группа сильных и очень разных участников — ai и кибербез фаундеры, руководитель агентства, продакты и дизайнеры. Всех объединяло одно: хотели руками провести исследование и применить результаты. Короткие спринты по 2-3 дня на протяжении 2 недель заставили держать темп — нельзя было отложить на потом. Если не успевали, на созвонах доделывали задания вместе. Это дало с…
🔥15🏆4👍2
Signed Vadim Glazkov
Как ты сделал бизнес 👨🏻 Владимир Мотин, сооснователь бюро 6Sns, расскажи историю, как ты сделал бизнес. • как перешёл из найма в своё дело • как понял, что компания состоялась • как агентству перестать брать “любую работу за деньги” и начать отказываться • как прожил годы «плохого продукта», прежде чем сделать нормальный Ссылки на Вову и компанию • Телеграм-канал RE:source • Сайт бюро ___ Ещё выпуск «Расскажи ист…
❤7⚡5🔥3🫡2
Signed Vadim Glazkov
Расскажи историю, как ты сделал бизнес Давно хочу общаться с предпринимателями и записывать их истории, как они создавали бизнес. Не просто советы уже успешных, как «правильно действовать другим», а узнавать, как на самом деле выглядела их жизнь в начале пути — со всеми сомнениями, ошибками и неочевидными решениями. Вижу вокруг очень много тех, кто хочет сделать свой бизнес. Кто-то вайб-кодит продукты, кто-то с экс…
❤16🔥12🎉5👀1👏1🫡1
Signed Vadim Glazkov
Обратная связь — инструмент, от которого зависит мотивация команды. Правильная — стимулирует развиваться, некорректная — разрушает доверие и лояльность, а в тяжёлых случаях — побуждает искать другую работу. Команда Яндекс Практикуме собрала всё, что знает об эффективной обратной связи, в один большой гайд. Берите и используйте: ✅12 моделей обратной связи для любых ситуаций с наглядными таблицами и примерами ✅Чек-ли…
❤8
Signed Vadim Glazkov
Интенсив по продуктовому исследованию Загадывали «наконец-то разобраться с исследованиями»? Когда уже прочитана куча статей, пройден курс, но всё ещё не проведено полноценное исследование. (касдев, JTBD, AJTBD, или как вы его называете). Я провожу интенсив, на котором участники сделают исследование своими руками от начала до конца, от постановки задачи до выводов. Моя задача — провести вас по всему циклу, от «с чег…
🔥14❤7🆒3
Signed Vadim Glazkov
Если вдруг вы забыли, чем я занимаюсь У меня агентство маркетинговых исследований. Я и моя команда делаем исследования под разные бизнес-задачи: • запуск нового продукта • вывод продукта в новую страну • поиск дополнительных ценностей для существующего продукта • сегментация текущих клиентов Работаем с качественными и количественными методами, проводим кабинетные исследования, экспертные интервью, тайные закупки у…
❤17🔥13👏4🫡1
Signed Vadim Glazkov
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @hiveminded. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 765,787 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CEO оптимизированный, Glazkov Vadim” (@hiveminded), 1,866 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hiveminded.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.