Channel
@historyandgenetics
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
106subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002225507330 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @historyandgenetics |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/historyandgenetics |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 106 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 106 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 19 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
91 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 44 | 48.4% | |
| 👍 | 35 | 38.5% | |
| 🤝 | 12 | 13.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2025 to 27 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Отрывок из Письма Мехди-Шамхала к генералу Ермолову 1818 года Я одарил их вещами и сына своего Сулеймана Пашу передав им отправил в Акушу, потому более что и я в малолетстве моим отцом поручен был Акушинцам и несколько лет жил между ними, имея в виду, что они иначе не могут иметь ко мне доверия, будучи подстрекаемы злонамеренными людьми. Одним словом я, уповая на Бога, решился сына своего Сулейман-пашу, как половину…
🔥17👍8
В 1773 году шамхал Хасбулат-Хан умер и в виду отсутствия детей, оказывается, оставил завещание, чтобы после него шамхальство было передано сыну его сестры Буйнакскому правителю Муртузали, сын Мехти, сына Муртузали. Но сын брата того шамхала, Казанский правитель Магомед, известный под прозвищем Беззубый, получил помощь от уцмия Амир-Гамзы, Аварского хана, Нуцала сына Умахана и правителей Эндерийских. Силами народа, со…
🔥14👍2
Надмогильная плита Мухаммадa Кадия Акушинского В 1203 году по хиджре пророка скончался Мухаммад Кади, сын Мусы, сына Юсуфа. Да простит их Аллах!
👍4🔥2🤝1
Сведения о горном Дагестане - 1835/1836. Гене Ф. И Огнестрельное оружие делают в Кубачи, кинжалы же лучшие делают в селениях Малое Казанище, Мулебки, Амузги. В Казикумуском владении так же делают кинжалы разных родов, но не такой доброты. В Обществе Андалал и Казикумухе, в селении Малое Казанище и Кубачи занимаются разными серебряными изделиями
👍4🔥2🤝2
1. Различные виды клинков работы амузгинских мастеров 2. Изображения на амузгинских клинках Оружие народов Кавказа. Аствацатурян Э. Г
👍6🔥2🤝2
Аланский Кафтан 7-9 века Музей искусств Метрополитен
🔥3
Миграция гаплогруппы G-M201 и частота ее по странам Грузия - 34% Гвинея - 16% Кипр - 14% Турция - 13% Афганистан - 13% Армения 13% Италия 11% Азербайджан 10%
🤝4
Вооружение кызылбаша, периода шахской династии Сефевидов Национальный музей истории Азербайджана
👍11🔥4
Первая и единственная всеобщая перепись населения Российской империи состоялась в 1897 году. Итоги были опубликованы в 1905 году в двух томах «Общего свода по империи». Однако стоит понимать, что в переписи не указывалась национальность, фиксировался только родной язык, что привело к значительным искажениям, особенно в отношении многоязычных и полиэтничных регионов. Дополнительную путаницу вносила и произвольная клас…
🤝3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @historyandgenetics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,056,208 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“History & Genetics” (@historyandgenetics), 106 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/historyandgenetics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.