नवाबों का शहर किसे कहा जाता है?

Channel
History Class Notes
@history_by_Khan_Abhishek_Sir
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
128,454subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001656364687 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @history_by_Khan_Abhishek_Sir |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/history_by_Khan_Abhishek_Sir |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 128,454 | first reading |
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.24%
- avg views ÷ 128,454 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 309
- 28 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.35%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 28
- of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (9 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,639 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 00:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 137
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 158
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
14 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 57.1% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 35.7% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
खानवा के युद्ध में पराजय से मेवाड़ की सत्ता को बहुत आघात पहुँचा, इस युद्ध में मेवाड़ को पराजित करने वाला कौन था?
- अकबर24%
- जहाँगीर12%
- शाहजहाँ27%
- बाबर36%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
लार्ड कर्जन ने वर्ष 1905 में बंगाल विभाजन कर दिया, विभाजन किस वर्ष में वापस लिया गया?
- 1906 में19%
- 1909 में31%
- 1911 में44%
- 1913 में6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
कौनसा हिन्दू राजा हर चौथे वर्ष प्रयाग में अपना सारा धन दान कर देता था?
- कनिष्क15%
- अशोक29%
- हर्षवर्धन50%
- बिन्दुसार6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
मध्यकालीन भारत में किस शासक ने सड़क निर्माण हेतु ख्याति प्राप्त की?
- अकबर3%
- शेरशाह सूरी86%
- बाबर9%
- औरंगजेब3%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
भारत का अंतिम मुगल सम्राट बहादुरशाह जफर (द्वितीय) का मकबरा कहाँ स्थित है-
- आगरा में6%
- रंगून (यंगून), म्यांमार में74%
- दिल्ली में20%
- अफगानिस्तान में0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔸लीजिए अब फ्रीडम SALE कल रात्रि 12 Am to 1 AM 349 में 1 साल की जगह 2 साल TESTBOOK OFFER PASS PRO मिलेगा ! सारे Exams का Mock Test series & Previous Year Papers , books & Courses ☑️ USE coupon Code 👉👉👉 ABHIPASS 12% OFF GUYS 349 only 2 Saal Validity Link 👇👇👇👇👇 https://link.testbook.com/mLLEpOVNeNb https://link.testbook.com/mLLEpOVNeNb
🇮🇳 𝐀𝐙𝐀𝐃 𝐒𝐀𝐏𝐍𝐎 𝐊𝐀 𝐒𝐀𝐋𝐄 🔥 🎉 Buy 1 Year Testbook Pass & Get 2 Years Pass @ ₹349! 🎁 BUY 1 GET 2 — साल में सिर्फ एक बार मिलने वाला धमाकेदार Offer! ⏰ सिर्फ 14th August | 12 AM – 1 AM | केवल 1 घंटे के लिए! 🎟️ Use Code: ABHIPASS ⚡ Lowest Price + Double Validity का शानदार मौका! ⚠️ 1 घंटे के बाद यह Special Offer उपलब्ध नहीं होगा। 👇🏻 BUY NOW 👇🏻 https://link.testbook.com/mLLEpOVNeNb
बंगाल के स्थायी बंदोबस्त का विचार आगे बढ़ाने में निम्नलिखित में से कौन एक शामिल नहीं था?
- एजेक्जेंडर डो13%
- थॉमस लाँ34%
- मोंटगोमरी मार्टिन43%
- फिलिप फ्रांसिस10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1🔥1
निम्नलिखित में से लेखक और स्रोत का कौनसा जोड़ा सही नहीं है?
- निजामुद्दीन = तबकात-ए-अकबरी16%
- मुहम्मद काजिम = मुंतखब-उल-लुबाब42%
- अब्दुल हमीद लाहौरी = पादशाहनामा27%
- केवल राम = तजकीरत-उल-उमरा15%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
निम्नलिखित में से किन सूफी संतों ने कादिरी सिलसिले को पंजाब तथा सिंध में लोकप्रिय बनाया?
- शेख मुहम्मद अल-हुसैनी तथा शेख अब्दुल कादिर25%
- शेख वजहउद्दीन अहमद तथा शेख मुहम्मद गौस63%
- शेख अब्दुल्लाह तथा शेख काजिन9%
- शेख फूल तथा शेख बुरहानुद्दीन4%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
वह स्थान कौनसा है जहाँ सुल्तान अलाउद्दीन खिलजी ने स्वयं को सुल्तान घोषित किया अथवा सिंहासन पर स्वयं को आसीन किया-
- अवध15%
- दिल्ली58%
- कड़ा25%
- इलाहाबाद2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @history_by_Khan_Abhishek_Sir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 20 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
खानवा के युद्ध में पराजय से मेवाड़ की सत्ता को बहुत आघात पहुँचा, इस युद्ध में मेवाड़ को पराजित करने वाला कौन था?
- अकबर24%
- जहाँगीर12%
- शाहजहाँ27%
- बाबर36%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
लार्ड कर्जन ने वर्ष 1905 में बंगाल विभाजन कर दिया, विभाजन किस वर्ष में वापस लिया गया?
- 1906 में19%
- 1909 में31%
- 1911 में44%
- 1913 में6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
कौनसा हिन्दू राजा हर चौथे वर्ष प्रयाग में अपना सारा धन दान कर देता था?
- कनिष्क15%
- अशोक29%
- हर्षवर्धन50%
- बिन्दुसार6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
मध्यकालीन भारत में किस शासक ने सड़क निर्माण हेतु ख्याति प्राप्त की?
- अकबर3%
- शेरशाह सूरी86%
- बाबर9%
- औरंगजेब3%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
भारत का अंतिम मुगल सम्राट बहादुरशाह जफर (द्वितीय) का मकबरा कहाँ स्थित है-
- आगरा में6%
- रंगून (यंगून), म्यांमार में74%
- दिल्ली में20%
- अफगानिस्तान में0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
निम्नलिखित में से लेखक और स्रोत का कौनसा जोड़ा सही नहीं है?
- निजामुद्दीन = तबकात-ए-अकबरी16%
- मुहम्मद काजिम = मुंतखब-उल-लुबाब42%
- अब्दुल हमीद लाहौरी = पादशाहनामा27%
- केवल राम = तजकीरत-उल-उमरा15%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Samanya_Hindi_vyakaran_grammar · 163,631
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“History Class Notes” (@history_by_Khan_Abhishek_Sir), 128,454 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/history_by_Khan_Abhishek_Sir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.