Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for HR без шаманства

Channel

HR без шаманства

@hire_me_smr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

164subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001204978455
TypeChannel
Username@hire_me_smr
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hire_me_smr

Growth

1581641617 August 2026 — 158 subscribers8 August 2026 — 158 subscribers17 August 2026 — 159 subscribers25 August 2026 — 160 subscribers31 August 2026 — 162 subscribers10 September 2026 — 161 subscribers19 September 2026 — 164 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 43 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 157–165 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 09:19164+3
10 Sept 2026, 10:19161-1
31 Aug 2026, 10:04162+2
25 Aug 2026, 06:11160+1
17 Aug 2026, 10:09159+1
8 Aug 2026, 18:01158no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:19158first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1031.3%
👍825.0%
🔥721.9%
custom 5371073319107827779412.5%
👌26.25%
🤔13.13%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC22 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Что происходит на рынке труда. Версия июля 2026 Коллеги, главный вывод этого месяца: рынок найма ожил, но проще не стал. Компании снова открывают вакансии и осторожно начинают смотреть вперед. Кандидатов стало больше. Зарплатные ожидания постепенно сближаются с предложениями. Но это не равно возвращение к спокойному рынку. Скорее, это переход к новой реальности, в которой и бизнесу, и кандидатам приходится точнее п

👍31🤔1

31 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC42 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐁Коллеги, есть тема для обсуждения и чек-лист эффективного найма для пересылок. Итак, это еще одно рассуждение на тему того, как рынок труда работает в наше с вами интересное время. Сегодня о том, что рассчитывать на входящий поток — уже совсем неработающая тактика. Представим, что вам нужен менеджер по продажам. HR размещает вакансию на hh и получает 50 откликов за день. Выглядит как победа! Но нет! На самом дел

2🔥2👍1

27 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC78 viewsread 8 August 2026

🎙Окно дискуссии: А вы наняли бы бывшего предпринимателя? Что для вас стало бы решающим аргументом?

27 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC83 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

#HRзадачка, коллеги и тема, которую хочется обсудить. Брать ли бывшего предпринимателя в команду? Итак, ситуация: Компания ищет директора по развитию. На собеседование приходит кандидат с сильным опытом: ➡️десять лет развивал собственный бизнес; ➡️самостоятельно выстраивал продажи и операционные процессы; ➡️нанимал команду и управлял сотрудниками; ➡️вёл переговоры с ключевыми клиентами и партнёрами; ➡️ отвечал за ф

👍4custom 537107331910782777942👌2

24 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC75 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как понять, что твой опыт работает? Попросить отзыв. Сохраняю историю человека, которому я просто подсветила, что он гораздо больше той позиции, которую занимает. Если чувствуете, что вам пора выйти за рамки или сменить фокус, пишите! Есть слот на консультацию! #КарьерасХантер

2🔥2

22 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC843 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рост компании — это почти всегда рост одного конкретного человека, который отказался остановиться. Сегодня необычная история, коллеги. Сегодня история о том, как 14-летняя девочка, выпросившая у отца землю под палисадник, вырастила крупнейший питомник гортензий в России и Европе. Сегодня история о «Садовом центре Веры Глуховой» — нашем клиенте, который умеет расти, вдохновлять и вести за собой. Ни наследства, ни с

3🔥3

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @hire_me_smr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HR без шаманства” (@hire_me_smr), 164 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hire_me_smr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.