Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for хипхопухоль

Channel

хипхопухоль

@hiphopyhol

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

53subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001978839327
TypeChannel
Username@hiphopyhol
DescriptionНАС ПОВЕСЯТ НА ШАРФЕ ОТ АНТИХАЙПА nice POST SHIT lord: @pgtlameshit мы уехали из посёлка «культпиздатово» покорять большой город.
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/hiphopyhol

Growth

538 August 2026 — 53 subscribers10 August 2026 — 53 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52–54 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 09:4653no change
8 Aug 2026, 16:1553first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.8%
avg views ÷ 53 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
29.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (16 September 202524 July 2026)
Views total37
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
102
Videos
1
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

448 reactions across 20 posts, in 59 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 4.02% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5071376750370357918184.02%
custom 5242293432021429279153.35%
custom 5296538967754168038153.35%
custom 5224634944566873788132.90%
custom 5330282176451728185132.90%
custom 5364264262640369033132.90%
custom 5384245674567026068132.90%
custom 5071282158010631015122.68%
custom 5334630384162322090122.68%
custom 5397570260847053426122.68%
custom 5467512600671570706122.68%
custom 5253528521006932253112.46%
custom 5452008425863006107112.46%
custom 5244652842240727923102.23%
custom 5271687642734413453102.23%
custom 5298744394805958616102.23%
custom 5386515813891077508102.23%
custom 5451772327215777211102.23%
custom 530773527747994021792.01%
custom 533452060050326275092.01%
39 further kinds21046.9%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 448reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2025 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 11:15 UTC37 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ну этого тоже с днём рождения осталось только вспомнить как рускиреп рисовать снова 😅😔😔

custom 52648829070040191614custom 53755364214885762884custom 54338328243459983273

Signed Supersonic 2000

10 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC71 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Маленький вкусненький малышочек 😘 с днём рождения 😔 с прошедшим точнее

custom 53981170574284619946custom 52287855751919351055custom 53123261809075444223

Signed Supersonic 2000

5 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC90 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

а знаете что спойлер в оксееезин 🩴

custom 53345206005032627509custom 52019837852639802115custom 54655981275893160983

Signed Supersonic 2000

22 May 2026, 14:10 UTC149 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Они кричат, что я спятил Для них я страшный маньяк Но я, скорее, последний романтик Ведь даже смерть не разлучит нас

custom 545177232721577721110custom 54519587502712586725custom 57670113475103343835

Signed местный забияка

7 May 2026, 13:38 UTC176 views25 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

There was nothing in the world That I ever wanted more Than to feel you deep in my heart There was nothing in the world That I ever wanted more Than to never feel the breaking apart My pictures of you

custom 533028217645172818513custom 51929694692484215376custom 54294998337045305376

Signed местный забияка

29 Apr 2026, 13:19 UTC173 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

а как можно через плечо в небо посмотреть кто-нибудь знает???

custom 54655283859103648358custom 53459496072621775645custom 53662229395260285183

Signed Supersonic 2000

20 Apr 2026, 20:26 UTC192 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

спустившись в переход смиренно клянчу сижки

custom 524465284224072792310custom 54520953989507486936custom 53481305272305764883

Signed Supersonic 2000

16 Mar 2026, 13:17 UTC232 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

дождь не может идти вечно окда 🤍

custom 546751260067157070612custom 53256297175528411696custom 51953705449454601055

Signed Supersonic 2000

30 Jan 2026, 22:11 UTC279 views27 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Поздравляем с днём рождения носик Мирона 😭🎉

custom 538424567456702606813custom 53841279409235076698custom 53822696503084538206

Signed Supersonic 2000

15 Jan 2026, 11:12 UTC288 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

випка в оксизин

custom 538651581389107750810custom 50713767503703579188custom 50712257049604922395

Signed местный забияка

13 Jan 2026, 23:45 UTC286 views25 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

СО ВСЕХ НАСЛАЖДАЮЩИХСЯ ТИШИНОЙ ПО ЛАЙКУ 😉 Леругешку @leragele с дерешкой)))

custom 533463038416232209012custom 54609526308324157127custom 53280025581348646266

Signed Supersonic 2000

3 Jan 2026, 09:54 UTC256 views25 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

And he was awful nice Really quite paradise And he sang all night long

custom 522463494456687378813custom 52223111181516372667custom 52244739391278494655

Signed местный забияка

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hiphopyhol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 774,515 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“хипхопухоль” (@hiphopyhol), 53 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hiphopyhol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.