Channel
@hindintel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003963894054 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hindintel |
| Description | 🌍 Independent OSINT covering defence, geopolitics, strategic affairs, and conflict developments across South Asia, the Indo-Pacific, and beyond. x.com/HindIntel |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hindintel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 27 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 27 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 20 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,450 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇵🇰⚡ Police Constable Anwarullah, a resident of Bozakhel Surani and posted at Bakakhel Police Station, was shot dead by unidentified gunmen near the Hamza Tablighi Markaz on Miranshah Road. The militant group Ittihad-ul-Mujahideen Pakistan (IMP) claimed responsibility for the attack. @HindIntel
🇵🇰⚡ The United Baloch Army (UBA) claimed responsibility for destroying a bridge near Dhadar, Kachhi District, Balochistan, on August 8. The group claimed its fighters used explosives to destroy the bridge at Sabri on the Sunny Road, stating that it was used by Pakistani military forces for logistics and movement. @HindIntel
🇵🇰⚡ According to local sources, a powerful explosion suspected to be a suicide bombing was reported early this morning near the Shah Katas Police Lines and Frontier Corps (FC) hospital in Hayatabad, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Gunfire was also reportedly heard following the explosion. Further details are awaited... @HindIntel
🇵🇰⚡ According to local sources, a boy who was injured yesterday in a suspected Pakistani military drone strike in the Shakro area of Mamund, Bajaur District, has succumbed to his injuries. The boy was reportedly transferred to Khar Hospital following the strike before later succumbing to his injuries. @HindIntel
🇵🇰⚡ According to local sources, two powerful explosions were heard in Mach, Kachhi District, Balochistan. Further details are awaited. @HindIntel
🇵🇰⚡ According to local sources, following a major attack on Pakistani security forces in Gomazi, the military reportedly sealed off the market and detained numerous individuals. The attack reportedly caused significant casualties and material losses among the forces. @HindIntel
🇵🇰⚡ The militant group Ittihad-ul-Mujahideen Pakistan (IMP) claimed responsibility for an IED attack targeting a Pakistani military patrol in the Prayat area of Dossali Tehsil, North Waziristan, on August 9. The group claimed that several military personnel were killed and injured in the attack, although the claim could not be independently verified. @HindIntel
🇵🇰⚡ Armed men reportedly intercepted and detained police Eagle Squad personnel on Qambrani Road in Quetta, Balochistan. The personnel were reportedly tied up before their official weapons were taken. One officer was slightly injured in the firing. No group has claimed responsibility. @HindIntel
🇵🇰⚡ Intense clashes have reportedly broken out between armed men and Pakistani security forces in the Gomazi area of Tump, Kech District, Balochistan. Further details are awaited. @HindIntel
🇵🇰⚡ According to local sources, heavy gunfire and explosions were reported in Gomazi, Kech District, Balochistan. Armed individuals reportedly targeted Pakistani military personnel in an attack, while further details regarding casualties are awaited. @HindIntel
🇵🇰⚡ According to local sources, unidentified assailants attacked police personnel on patrol near the Old Police Lines in Lakki Marwat District, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, earlier today. Constable Sajidullah was killed in the attack, while Muhammad Waqas sustained injuries. @HindIntel
🇵🇰⚡ According to Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) sources, militants carried out a mortar attack on a Pakistani military post in Parachinar, Upper Kurram, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The group claimed the attack caused multiple security force casualties and identified the following personnel as injured: • Havaldar Irfan • Havaldar Arshad • Gunner Ata • Gunner Mubarak • Sepoy Jahanzeb @HindIntel
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @hindintel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 97,627 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HindIntel” (@hindintel), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hindintel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.