Channel
@himanny_panix_beads
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
621subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002180065851 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @himanny_panix_beads |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/himanny_panix_beads |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 621 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 621 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (1 April 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 243 |
| Reactions total | 45 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
383 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5197588612085985106 | 123 | 32.1% | |
| ❤ | 104 | 27.2% | |
| custom 5246943910940403746 | 86 | 22.5% | |
| custom 5328014489554002336 | 24 | 6.27% | |
| 💘 | 16 | 4.18% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 2.61% | |
| 🍾 | 9 | 2.35% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 1.57% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 0.522% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 0.522% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.261% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 383reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем привет! Хочу поделиться тем, что сегодня у меня др и мне исполняется 22 года🥳 Хочу выразить всем вам благодарность за то, что долгие годы вы со мной❤️ пусть я сейчас не активная в бк, но я все ещё тут, с вами 🥰 Желаю сама себе поскорее вернуться в творчество и творить новую красоту для вас🫶
custom 519758861208598510619❤14🍾9💋2custom 52469439109404037461
Ребята, меня повысили на работе до должности Супервайзера, очень тяжело сейчас, много дел по работе, я каждый день в слезах, потому что пока что не справляюсь, учусь и тд Поэтому какое-то время не могу плести вообще Не теряйте, я жива здорова, просто очень много работы, но надеюсь скоро к вам вернусь (когда будет это скоро я хз)
custom 524694391094040374626custom 519758861208598510616❤8👍5🤮2💘1
Я Разучилась Плести ☠
custom 524694391094040374625❤7custom 51975886120859851064🔥3💘2
???
❤22🔥7💘4custom 52469439109404037463custom 51975886120859851062
Всем здрасте, всем привет 👋 Долго думала писать этот пост или нет, но смотрю на отписки и думаю все же написать🫣 Как вы могли заметить я не плету ужк очень долгое время, ну да, что-то начинала там пару раз плести, но увы - меня не тянет к бисеру, а заставлять я себя не могу, хоть убейте🫠 поэтому я на неопределённый срок отложила бисер, снова погрузилась в работу, семью, свои другие увлечения, крысками своими занялас…
❤23custom 52469439109404037464💘1
Хочу после бонуса бесплатку выпустить, не за сбор или цель, а просто так, плюс размером не маленькую, есть идеи?) Свои варианты (рефы) жду в комментариях) Пи си: можете что-то поискать на канале с рефами
custom 519758861208598510618custom 53280144895540023366custom 52469439109404037465❤2💘1
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️ Всем здрасте, всем привет🥳 Наконец выкладываю наши итоги)) Работы получились по-настоящему крутецкие! И ведь это был обычный сп, а не конкурс на лучшее исполнение, и меня безусловно радует, что люди идут именно ради плетения, а не призов за первые места❤️ Но не могу не подметить, что среди этих работ у меня есть фавориты)) девчонки, вы супер!!! Да, сп у нас затянулся ещё плюсом на месяц, но это и…
custom 519758861208598510614❤9💘4custom 52469439109404037464custom 53280144895540023362
Всем здрасте, всем привет🔥 Показываю головушку для подруги чертика без блюра. Я в замешательстве, ну никак не пртдумывается поза и образ для нее, хоть убейте.. да и прическа мне сюда не придумывается и части тела тоже, хоть выбрасывай( Хочу подружку ему сплести, но не нравится мне она, ну никак вот⚪️
custom 524694391094040374612❤8custom 51975886120859851066custom 53280144895540023366🍓1💘1
🩷🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 Снова я с букетиком к вам) Сделала его маме на день рождения, получилось 45 роз⚪️ Приехала в Казань в мамин др тайно, сделала сюрприз и она абалдела))) Пи си: бисер я уже месяца 2 не трогаю.. то работа, то дела, то вот отпуск, не знаю когда возьмусь за бисер.. нет ни времени, ни желания, хочется выбросить все к чертям если честно😭
custom 519758861208598510621custom 53280144895540023366custom 52469439109404037463💘2👍1
🩷 💜 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷💜 Очень торопилась сделать эту красоту к 1 апреля, так как сегодня мы ездили поздравлять с днем рождения мою свекровь🩷 В букете 25 роз, из-за работы процесс шёл очень медленно( а за эту неделю мне надо успеть сделать букет раза в 3 больше этого, но уже для своей мамы🩷 Не бисер, но хотя-бы вот такая красота вам в ленту)
custom 519758861208598510623❤11custom 53280144895540023364custom 52469439109404037463
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @himanny_panix_beads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 548,001 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@himanny_panix_beads named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“☠🫀𝙷𝙸𝙼𝙰𝙽𝙽𝚈 𝙿𝙰𝙽𝙸𝚇 𝙱𝙴𝙰𝙳𝚂🫀☠” (@himanny_panix_beads), 621 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/himanny_panix_beads.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.