Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

HIGH JUMP cover dance team

@highjump2011

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

309subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001587014756
TypeChannel
Username@highjump2011
Description💫 Since 2011 🇷🇺 Russia, Vladivostok
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/highjump2011

Growth

3099 Aug 2026, 10:50 — 309 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 11:00 — 309 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 10:509 Aug 2026, 11:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 308–310 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 11:00309no change
9 Aug 2026, 10:50309first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 11 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
77.3%
avg views ÷ 309 subscribers
Avg views / post
239
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026
Posts held18 (11 June 202618 July 2026)
Views total478
Reactions total70
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
231
Videos
62
Links
240

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 54s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

590 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 576937177993183638816327.6%
custom 576933671581883177512921.9%
custom 57716734529057625377713.1%
custom 57691178142206564787011.9%
6410.8%
custom 5877556186437390246386.44%
custom 5769518135237416054233.90%
🏆162.71%
🔥91.53%
custom 576916360286699892510.169%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 590reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 04:44 UTC304 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 576933671581883177513custom 576937177993183638810custom 58775561864373902466

18 Jul 2026, 04:32 UTC174 views41 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 576933671581883177520custom 576937177993183638812custom 57691178142206564789

11 Jul 2026, 06:33 UTC286 views46 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Эра LALALALA - ВСЁ! 🥲 Ждёте готовый кавер? Да - 👍 Нет - 😭

custom 5769371779931836388405custom 57691636028669989251

11 Jul 2026, 05:37 UTC428 views36 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 576951813523741605418custom 57691178142206564788custom 576937177993183638873

11 Jul 2026, 05:19 UTC451 views36 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 576937177993183638816custom 57693367158188317759custom 577167345290576253783

11 Jul 2026, 04:24 UTC523 views40 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

16custom 576933671581883177512custom 57693717799318363888🔥2custom 57691178142206564782

21 Jun 2026, 10:00 UTC343 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026

И снова Юля раздаёт стиль! 👅 пы.сы. не забыайте голосовать за наших девочек 🐹

custom 577167345290576253716custom 57691178142206564787custom 57693717799318363886

21 Jun 2026, 10:00 UTC326 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 576937177993183638815custom 57716734529057625379

21 Jun 2026, 09:42 UTC302 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026

А вот и Милана выступила в соло! Кружочек не выдержал энергию Миланы и аж с ошибкой загрузился, поэтому смотрие так! Это слишком хорошо 😎

14custom 57693717799318363887custom 57691178142206564786

21 Jun 2026, 09:39 UTC299 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

15custom 57691178142206564789custom 57693717799318363888

21 Jun 2026, 08:44 UTC270 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026

А мы сегодня на SUPERNOVA и наша Юля уже выступила в дуэте под Jay Park ✌

custom 576937177993183638813custom 57691178142206564784custom 57693367158188317753

21 Jun 2026, 08:44 UTC257 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 587755618643739024613custom 57693367158188317758🔥7custom 57691178142206564782

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @highjump2011. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HIGH JUMP cover dance team” (@highjump2011), 309 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/highjump2011.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.