Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Канал Криса (архив)

Channel

Канал Криса (архив)

@hieaifsatwwmmp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

76subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002232931462
TypeChannel
Username@hieaifsatwwmmp
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hieaifsatwwmmp

Growth

768781.511 August 2026 — 87 subscribers11 August 2026 — 87 subscribers27 August 2026 — 86 subscribers5 September 2026 — 79 subscribers13 September 2026 — 76 subscribers11 August 202613 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 33 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 74–89 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 17:1776-3
5 Sept 2026, 11:2179-7
27 Aug 2026, 19:0886-1
11 Aug 2026, 20:2887no change
11 Aug 2026, 11:1887first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

337 reactions across 15 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5817.2%
❤‍🔥5315.7%
custom 54386517089326415504413.1%
💘319.20%
👎247.12%
🕊236.82%
🔥175.04%
🆒144.15%
🍓113.26%
👍82.37%
💅82.37%
😇82.37%
🐳72.08%
🌭61.78%
😁51.48%
custom 520408376657367186641.19%
custom 520424645563987811041.19%
😱30.89%
🎃20.593%
💊20.593%
5 further kinds51.48%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 337 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 16 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hieaifsatwwmmp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2025 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTC40 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ребята это значит что я больше сюда выкладывать не буду, выходите

👎8

Signed Крис

4 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC73 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Щитпост, как создам новый канал обязательно там сообщу

❤6🥰1

Signed Крис

3 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC90 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

в реакциях одно мнениях а в коментариях другое, я считаю что так будет удобнее решить

  1. 👍70%
  2. 👎42%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed Крис

3 Aug 2026, 06:44 UTC87 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Я надумываю может сделать этот канал архивом и оставить щитпост потому что я сюда почти ничего не выкладываю и он валяется просто как галерея моих старых артов, но оставить щитпост а потом как появятся какие то грандиозные планы создать новый канал и уже в нем выкладывать, как думаете?

👎9❤6😱3🕊2

Signed Крис

3 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC48 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @ShitpostChrisaPhoto

Иии

❤10🕊3

Signed Крис

3 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC36 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @ShitpostChrisaPhoto

Не верьте человеку что пишет на моем основном канале, я в артблокеничего меня не спасет

❤8🕊3😇1

Signed Крис

26 May 2026, 10:55 UTC196 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

извените извени те зивени

custom 54386517089326415508

Signed Крис

26 May 2026, 10:54 UTC174 views24 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @ShitpostChrisaPhoto

Привет вылезаю из артблока

custom 54386517089326415509🐳7😇5🕊3

Signed Крис

30 Jan 2026, 10:32 UTC367 views37 reactionsread 11 August 2026

поставьте лайк что бы я знал что вы не злитесь

custom 543865170893264155015👎6❤‍🔥3👍3custom 52042464556398781103❤2🌭2☃1

Signed Крис

30 Jan 2026, 10:28 UTC329 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ладно аватарка канала хуйня ахахах потом поменяю друзья

💅8❤3❤‍🔥3🌭1👎1💊1💩1🕊1

Signed Крис

25 Nov 2025, 21:16 UTC841 views41 reactions10 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Привет, остальное рисую

🔥15❤11custom 54386517089326415506🍓2🕊2😇2❤‍🔥1🌭1

Signed Крис

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @hieaifsatwwmmp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTCFinal Results33 voters

в реакциях одно мнениях а в коментариях другое, я считаю что так будет удобнее решить

  1. 👍70%
  2. 👎42%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2025 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Канал Криса (архив)” (@hieaifsatwwmmp), 76 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hieaifsatwwmmp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.