Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Убежище HideЁжика

@hidehedgehog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

129subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002426038442
TypeChannel
Username@hidehedgehog
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/hidehedgehog

Growth

1297 August 2026 — 129 subscribers9 August 2026 — 129 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 128–130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 01:31129no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:46129first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
141.6%
avg views ÷ 129 subscribers
Avg views / post
183
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held11 (17 July 20262 August 2026)
Views total2,010
Reactions total238
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
827
Videos
68
Links
64

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 40s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

238 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰3816.0%
🔥3715.5%
3514.7%
💋3313.9%
custom 54071198156870416752410.1%
😭229.24%
custom 5409270645114565636114.62%
❤‍🔥104.20%
custom 601694440652171282293.78%
💯72.94%
👍62.52%
custom 601701198783211499552.10%
🍓10.42%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC79 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#косплей_ежа Ииии... Рубрика угадай что за персонаж~ На этот раз будет действительно сложно 😩 От незнающих - жду правильный ответ~ От знающих - принимаются только неправильные ответы~

🔥13🥰9custom 60169444065217128227

1 Aug 2026, 21:40 UTC74 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @SipHArtVideo

Начали репетировать новую штуку, первая репа с Листочком и Ежом, ставили основные части для остальной команды, ваши предположения что это😏

💋64custom 54071198156870416753

31 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC114 views43 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#жизнь_ежа 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Эволюция покемона и... Первые фоточки от фотографа с Эпика, которые ощущаются☺️ Я в любви... К самому себе🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 За шедевры спасибо невероятному мастеру: ph

🔥16🥰12custom 540927064511456563611❤‍🔥21💋1

28 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTC157 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026

#жизнь_ежа Ой, а что это! 🥰 А ничего... Абсолютное ничего. Честно, никогда ещё не грустила из-за непрохода на фестивали так сильно, как из-за заявок не прошедших на Вайб... Это первый Вайб, начиная с самого первого для меня фестиваля, в целом, на который ничего не прошло🥲 А ведь так много крутых ребят которых хотелось увидеть и с которыми желалось выступить на одной сцене. Но я сам идиот. Решил не подавать Каина,

😭22custom 60170119878321149953

27 Jul 2026, 13:36 UTC159 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @sonneolferPhoto

Коммишечка для заявки на косплей для прелестного ежа вот и выдался повод порисовать эпик

🔥8custom 540711981568704167564🥰1

21 Jul 2026, 16:33 UTC218 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#косплей_ежа Ещё один спойлер к заявочкам на мой любимый фестиваль🥰 Думаю, после него станет всё понятно Я буду драться за эту заявку! (и молиться всем Греческим Богам, на коленях) 😩

🥰12❤‍🔥4custom 540711981568704167531💋1

21 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC169 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @SipHArtPhoto

Посты будут позже, по причине того что Аникон прошёл потрясающе!!!

8custom 54071198156870416752custom 60169444065217128222❤‍🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC129 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @zlataagaVideo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Ориджинал дефиле Anicon 2026 Знали бы вы как я бесконечно люблю шаманчиков, это то самое дефиле которое само придумалось и очень легко и приятно реализовывалось Бесконечно люблю каждого шаманчика А ещё получается с задержкой, но нашаманили ветерок и похолодание на дни фестиваля 🤩Коричневый мальчик - Wine Leaf 🤩Фиолетовый мальчик - HideЁж 🤩Зелёная девочка - Сип 🤩Синяя девочка - zlata_a

4custom 54071198156870416752custom 60170119878321149952❤‍🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 19:30 UTC306 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#косплей_ежа Отплясали один фестиваль и уже записываем заявочки на следущий... Подсказочка - мой любимый🥰 Посмотрите, какой чудесный нежный драконыш невдупленыш получается ☺️ А всё благодаря волшебным лапкам: Кролика

💋157💯7

19 Jul 2026, 19:06 UTC112 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @zlataaga

Нашаманили на второе место в ориджинале🤩🤩🤩

👍6🥰3custom 54071198156870416751

17 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC493 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#косплей_ежа Я не можу, такие🥰 Отвыступали сегодня на Анике! Шаманчики такие стилевые и удобные, что просто, аааааааа, восторг!😩 Звучит так словно сам себя не похвалишь... Но я хвалю золотые ручки и светлые умы, которые сотворили это!🥺 Вот они, слева-направо: Кровавая ведьма заводила Главная шаманка гадалка И Вкусненький маленький малышочек

💋10custom 540711981568704167576❤‍🔥2🍓1🥰1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @hidehedgehog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 412,139 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Убежище HideЁжика” (@hidehedgehog), 129 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hidehedgehog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.