Channel
@hiddensaga
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
37,661subscribers
+217 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002565005931 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hiddensaga |
| Description | Uncover breathtaking hidden histories and mind-blowing secrets from around the world 🌍✨! Follow now for exclusive insights you won't see anywhere else. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hiddensaga |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 37,661 | +103 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 37,558 | +41 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 37,517 | +73 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 37,444 | first reading |
46 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (6 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 455,130 |
| Reactions total | 2,047 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,047 reactions across 46 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 5.81% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 119 | 5.81% | |
| 🍾 | 93 | 4.54% | |
| 🍓 | 76 | 3.71% | |
| 🤗 | 74 | 3.62% | |
| 💯 | 73 | 3.57% | |
| 😇 | 69 | 3.37% | |
| 🎉 | 68 | 3.32% | |
| 🐳 | 62 | 3.03% | |
| 🤣 | 59 | 2.88% | |
| 😍 | 58 | 2.83% | |
| 🦄 | 58 | 2.83% | |
| 🤝 | 55 | 2.69% | |
| 🙏 | 54 | 2.64% | |
| ⚡ | 49 | 2.39% | |
| 🥰 | 47 | 2.30% | |
| 🤓 | 46 | 2.25% | |
| 🎃 | 44 | 2.15% | |
| 🏆 | 44 | 2.15% | |
| 👍 | 44 | 2.15% | |
| 🔥 | 43 | 2.10% | |
| 34 further kinds | 812 | 39.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,047reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
British farmer: "We've been offered £2500 [by the UK government] to join a scheme for three years, where we don't supply you any food." Why would a government pay farmers to stop producing food? 🤔 Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret History Whispers of the Unknown
💔3💋2👍1🔥1😍1😡1🙏1
2002 - CSPAN. Polio Vaccination Agenda in Africa by Kihura Nkuba. "We had no polio issues, and no children were dying—until they launched the vaccination campaign using the LIVE polio vaccine." Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret History Whispers of the Unknown
🎄5🎉2👏2🍓1🏆1
Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret History Whispers of the Unknown
🐳3🖕3❤2😘2😴2🎄1🎉1🤗1
Macaulay was yet another child star who suffered through abuse. Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret History Whispers of the Unknown
❤6🍾3🤝3🙏3🌭2👏2🤮2🎉1
You can’t make this up. Alex Clark: “During the Vietnam War, the U.S. government ordered seven chemical companies—Monsanto included—to develop Agent Orange. Decades later, the same corporations that produced that toxic defoliant are now selling patented seeds to American farmers. Today, those seeds dominate 80% of our farmland—corn, soybeans, alfalfa, wheat—all engineered to withstand a herbicide we know all too wel…
❤4😴4🤗3😎3🍓2🍾2🎄2🤷2
Mercury (commonly referred to as Thimerosal) in vaccines. It hasn't been properly tested since 1929. Big Pharma has been—and always will be—intentionally corrupt and deeply untrustworthy. Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret History Whispers of the Unknown
😎9⚡4😍3🐳1🤷1
❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ KILLS WARTS & PARASITES FOR GOOD ❗️ If you’re dealing with papillomas (skin warts), there’s a strong chance parasites have taken root inside your organs ❗️ As a dermatologist with years of experience in dermatology and cosmetic care, I’ve seen how painful and distressing these growths can be. And I’ve made it my mission to help people overcome them for good. 👇🏽 Here’s a simple, proven method that actual…
🍓4😇4😡3🗿2🤷2😍2🙊2🙏2
This is what your brain actually does while you sleep. Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret History Whispers of the Unknown
😱12😍7🌚6🎄6😎6🔥5💯4🙉4
Share this with your friends and family. Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret History Whispers of the Unknown
🌚7👀6💯6🥰6⚡4😇4🍾3👏3
A lot of people keep missing this ... because it keeps getting pulled from the market. Barbara O'Neill knows what’s really happening. She’s helped thousands over the course of her career. In this book, she breaks down everything you need to understand about every system in your body. You never know when you’ll need it — but when that moment comes, you’ll want it within reach. Don’t wait until it’s gone again. Get …
💋8🤝7🤩7⚡6😡6🐳5🍓4🍌3
If you value your well-being, this is something you shouldn't overlook. Thousands have transformed their mindset after reading Sustain Me. Could you be next? The definitive guide to natural remedies, holistic health, and timeless principles for a better life. 🌿💚 Whispers of the Unknown
🖕5💋4🤷4😐4🎉3😎3❤2🍓2
This might just be the greatest ten minutes in TV history 😂 Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret History Whispers of the Unknown
🙉8🦄7🎄6👌5😍5⚡4😡4🤷3
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @hiddensaga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 503,989 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Whispers of the Unknown” (@hiddensaga), 37,661 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hiddensaga.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.