Channel
@hiclickru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
219subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001640942699 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hiclickru |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hiclickru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 219 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 222 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 223 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 224 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 224 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 7 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
18 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 55.6% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 22.2% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 16.7% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
SEO — это не только технические штучки Клиенты всё чаще обращаются за комплексными SEO-исследованиями для стратегического планирования. Используем данные SEO-аналитики для маркетинга и бизнес-планирования. Хотите узнать больше? Запишитесь на консультацию! #SEO #маркетинг #бизнеспланирование #аналитика #продажи
🔥1
🚀 Запускаем студию AI-разработки! Привет, друзья! Я и @Yarnuh (Владимир) стартуем Кот(д).Строй 😺🏗️ Название пока сыровато, домен не взяли — но тянуть некогда, летим вперёд! Что мы делаем: Быстрые и экономичные AI-решения для теста гипотез. Экономим ваши деньги на дешёвых тестах! Выступаем спикерами и экспертами на федеральных и локальных ивентах. Приглашайте - рассмотрим с удовольствием. Готовый продукт уже здесь…
🔥1
Какой стиль вам зашёл больше всего ? :)
The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Дзен В реке Телеграм возникли волны, где искусственный разум чистит слова, как монах чистит камешки. 🌊 Давайте посмотрим, как этот пост может обрести форму в разных одеждах духа, словно одна и та же вода в разных сосудах. Пути стиля: 1. Формальный — как прямой путь в храм. 2. Короткий — как молчание после удара барабана. 3. Дикарь — как ветер в горах без тропы. 4. Корпоративный — как сетка из нитей, удерживающая в…
Викинг В ладонях Телеграма зародилась огненная магия ИИ, ковающая слова! Взгляните, как этот свиток преобразится под властью разных стихий: 1. Строгий, как закон в Хельги. 2. Короткий, как удар секиры. 3. Дикий, как волк в лесу. 4. Корпоративный, словно в зале укупоренных сундуков. 5. Библейский, с гласом самого Одина. 6. Викинг, как мы, сыны бури. 7. Дзен, спокойный, как море перед штормом.
Библейский Вот вестник, явленный в телеге, гласящий о том, что слово человеческое ныне ткут искусные духи, именуемые ИИ. 📜✨ Да призовем же мы взор наш и узрим, яко же явится сей пост под различными покровами, кои навяжет нам разум этот искусный. 🌟 Вот же их имена, яко столпы закона: 1. Формальный, строгий и нелицеприятный. 📜 2. Короткий, дабы не утомлять слух. ⚡ 3. Дикарь, гневный и необузданный. 🌿 4. Корпоративны…
🔥1
Корпоративный Восхищён тем, что экосистема Telegram интегрировала инновационные решения на базе искусственного интеллекта для трансформации текстового контента! Это настоящий прорыв в нашей цифровой миссии. С радостью приглашаю вас к совместному исследованию потенциала этой платформы: как мы можем адаптировать этот пост, используя различные стратегические подходы к коммуникации? Давайте рассмотрим возможности масшта…
👍1
Дикарь Моя видеть огонь в небе. 🔥 Твоя смотреть мясо по-разному. 🥩 Стиль один: серьезный. Стиль два: короткий. Стиль три: дикарь. Стиль четыре: стадо. Стиль пять: духи. 🙏 Стиль шесть: воин. ⚔️ Стиль семь: тишина. 🌿 Моя ждать мяса.
🔥1
Формальный В Telegram была внедрена функция обработки текстов с использованием искусственного интеллекта. 🤖 Рассмотрим возможные варианты преобразования данного сообщения в различных стилях подачи: 1. Формальный 2. Краткий 3. Разговорный (неофициальный) 4. Корпоративный 5. Библейский (религиозный) 6. Стиль викингов 7. Дзен 🧘♂️
В телеге появилась обработка текстов с помощью ИИ. Давайте посмотрим каким может получиться этот пост с разными стилями подачи (обработкой ИИ). стили - 1. формальный 2. Короткий 3. Дикарь 4. Корпоративный 5. Библейский (религиозный) 6. Викинг 7. Дзен
⚡️ФАС: реклама в Telegram разрешена в 2026 году Появилось новое разъяснение по рекламе на интернет-ресурсах: рекламу в Telegram можно продолжать размещать. ✅ Это значит, что кампании можно запускать в привычном режиме без изменений. доступно 4 700+ каналов в MAX для рекламы :) обращайтесь!
👍1
Набросок своей црм для оконной компании. Интересно было бы создать сервис для своего бизнеса, который будет учитывать особенности процессов ? Посмотрите видео : https://disk.yandex.ru/i/wEaTMujC8zqUxw Условия очень гуманные ) Пишите вопросы!
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @hiclickru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой стиль вам зашёл больше всего ? :)
The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 20 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 122,286 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нормальный маркетинг - нормальный бизнес” (@hiclickru), 219 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hiclickru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.