Channel
@hi_ii
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
48,170subscribers
-1,898 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001119043683 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hi_ii |
| Description | •●•افضل قناة عراقية ترفيهية•●• •نسعى لرسم البسمه لكم واسعادكم •كل يوم منشورات وفقرات جديدة • |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 December 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hi_ii |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 18:50 | 48,170 | -64 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 03:18 | 48,234 | -118 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 19:48 | 48,352 | -104 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:18 | 48,456 | -22 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:21 | 48,478 | -6 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:34 | 48,484 | -11 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:35 | 48,495 | -15 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:48 | 48,510 | -18 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:27 | 48,528 | -5 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:59 | 48,533 | -23 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:10 | 48,556 | -30 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:19 | 48,586 | -14 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:10 | 48,600 | -15 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:51 | 48,615 | -10 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 48,625 | -18 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 48,643 | -11 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 48,654 | -17 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:31 | 48,671 | -17 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:35 | 48,688 | -25 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:40 | 48,713 | first reading |
45 posts held, back to 9 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (9 September 2025 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 3,610 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 12:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
إلى جمهور عراق كيكرز.. أنتم جزء من الحكاية ❤️ أربعة عشر عاماً لم تكن مجرد سنوات من العمل، بل كانت رحلة من الشغف، والحضور، ومواكبة تفاصيل المشهد الرياضي والإخباري العراقي. اليوم، لا نغيّر شعاراً اعتدتم عليه فحسب، بل نفتح صفحة جديدة من هويتنا، برؤية بصرية أكثر اختصاراً ووضوحاً، تعبّر عن شخصية منصة شبابية تعرف ماذا تقول، ولمن تقول. عراق كيكرز بهوية جديدة.. لكن بروح تعرفونها، وشغف لا يتغيّر. هذه ليست نهاية هوية، بل ب…
Channel photo updated
الجبّـار يجبر تلك الكسور فيمسحُ على قلبك بُلطفٍ منه
يتمسك الإنسان بمعان فارغة في حياته ، خوفًا من أن يعيش حياة فارغة من أي معنى .
أومن أن الأشياء التي تذهب لن تعود . والتي تنكسر غير قابلة للإصلاح . مهما كانت محاولات من أجلها صادقة وحقيقية . ثم شيء ناقص لن يعود أبداً
وَلَستُ بِهَيّابٍ لِمَن لا يَهابُني وَلَستُ أَرى لِلمَرءِ ما لا يَرى لِيّ فَإِن تَدنُ مِنّي تَدنُ مِنكَ مَوَدَّتي وَإِن تَنأَ عَنّي تَلقَني عَنكَ نائِيا
ولا ألومُ من يَخذِلُنِي أنا المَلُومُ على حُسن الرَّجَا فيهِ
كأسك الذي أذقته غيرك ، لن تموت حتى يذيقك الله منه إن خيراً فَخير ، إن شراً فَشَر 🤍
وهكذا تمضي الحياة بي ، أعيش في أنتظار لحظة مشرقة في ظلمات الليل ، أو لحظة هادئة في غمرة النهار .
لشدة ما خسر الإنسان، بات يعرف الذي بين يديه إن كان ثمينًا حقيقةً، أم أنه شيئًا زائفًا سيخسره في منتصف الطريق.
الأمر ليس بكثرتهم حولك، إنما بمن يأتيك دون أن تناديه، ومن يربت على كتفك دون أن تخبره بأنك مثقل.
لم نعد نريد تحقيق أحلامنا، أصبحنا نريد إكمال الواقع بأقل الخسائر.
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @hi_ii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
هم مشتاقين للقناة؟؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2025 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“عراق كيكرز 🇮🇶” (@hi_ii), 48,170 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hi_ii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.