رغم سهولة الصمت إلا أنه أشد ثقلاً من الكلام ورغم أنه لاُ يبذل فيه أي مجهود إلا أنه أكثر ارهاقاً وتعباً من الحديث .

Channel
عراق كيكرز 🇮🇶
@hi_ii
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
49,397subscribers
-671 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001119043683 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hi_ii |
| Description | •●•افضل قناة عراقية ترفيهية•●• •نسعى لرسم البسمه لكم واسعادكم •كل يوم منشورات وفقرات جديدة • |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hi_ii |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 49,397 | -38 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 49,435 | -31 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 49,466 | -33 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 49,499 | -37 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 49,536 | -58 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 49,594 | -35 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 49,629 | -23 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:46 | 49,652 | -24 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:04 | 49,676 | -21 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 49,697 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 49,709 | -17 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 49,726 | -16 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 49,742 | -14 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 49,756 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 49,768 | -16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 49,784 | -25 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 49,809 | -27 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 49,836 | -13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 49,849 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 49,866 | first reading |
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 9 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.87%
- avg views ÷ 49,397 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,900
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (9 September 2025 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 37,690 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 06:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈77,800
- Videos
- ≈8,290
- Links
- ≈945
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 22s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
و انك في قمة عجزك ولكن لله تدبير سينزعك من هذا.
” يَستهويني مُخاطبة شخصٍ يمتلكُ مِن الأبجدية ما يدعك تتأمل المُحادثة، مرةً ومرتين وثلاث دونَ ملل .“
عسى أن يجبرنا الله في كل شيءٍ نقصده، وألا يمسّنا فزع ولا شك ولا خيبة، عسى أن يقرّ الله أعيننا بما ننتظره وأن يُيسّر لنا ما يسُرّ قلوبنا ويرضيها، عسى أن نأنس ويؤنس بنا ونأمن ويؤمن بنا، عسى أن ننال ما نود وأن تستقر قلوبنا وتطمئن..
عزيزي . . ماذا يمكنني أن أقول لك ؟ الأمور لا تمضي على ما يرام أبداً أنني أكثر حزنًا وضجراً مما أستطيع أن أصفه لك ولم أعد أعرف في أي نقطة أنا .
"كمْ مِنْ كلِيمٍ شَكا لِلنَّاسِ لَوعَتَهُ فزادَهُ النَّاسُ وَجْدًا فوقَ مَا وَجَدَا"
أيَنسى القلبُ إنسانًا لهُ في روحِهِ مَسرَى؟ أينسى القلبُ أيامًا لها في عُمقِهِ مَجرَى؟
اني اهيم شوقاً ان مر بخاطري اتراه يذكرني ولو سهواً ويبتسمُ
وحدهم القريبون جدًّا بارعون في خياطة ثوب حُزنٍ على مقاسك تمامًا.
انا امشّي بالدلع والحنيّه غَيرهَا ما أمشّي لو تِسحبني سَحب .
رغم سهولة الصمت إلا أنه أشد ثقلاً من الكلام ورغم أنه لاُ يبذل فيه أي مجهود إلا أنه أكثر ارهاقاً وتعباً من الحديث .
"الأمان هو أن تشعر بأحدهم ممسكاً بقلبك لا بيدك."
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @hi_ii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
هم مشتاقين للقناة؟؟
- اي87%
- لا13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2025 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@mjlas_1 · 866#1
@blackroom1985 · 411#2
@first982025 · 13,515#3
@g7assak · 1,069#4
@Tokio88 · 475#5
@WtGetvaicli · 368 (as read 25 August 2026)#6
@amoury1991 · 34,053#7
@cseix · 273#8
@rohm_911 · 187 (as read 25 August 2026)#9
@Yara_m36 · 1,260#10
@ieeos · 982#11
@nothing_yet111 · 4,249#12
@ha1310 · 429#13
@saor4 · 1,390#14
@AAAAAFFFFAF · 137#15
@q_p_81 · 248,839#16
@Meli3n · 1,177#17
@n25hl · 482#18
@w_lelo_w · 4,276#19
@rusullllll · 762#20
@al_os7 · 1,985#21
@SAFR13 · 1,389#22
@khawatir_9 · 3,296#23
@MAi3i · 59,052#24
@KKK_JJJ88 · 22,915#25
@H6n_2 · 3,436#26
@ahmadtuha20 · 3,340#27
@Silveaa · 2,478#28
@majaraty_9 · 10,115#29
@AR_313A · 7,605#30
@noratty · 15,132#31
@zahraa_habib_313 · 1,942#32
@eqt_iq · 25,634#33
@ask_33s · 24,226#34
@shoodmousa7 · 6,817#35
@shosh20_44 · 89 (as read 25 August 2026)#36
@malak_be888 · 6,682#37
@for_ro_you · 25,115#38
@alkareem8 · 13,557#39
@Lust_Pen · 10,557#40
@sakhariat_katib · 1,319#41
@Tr_7l · 6,321#42
@SAMBOSAIQ · 10,407#43
@Mbagdad · 25,682#44
@STNRYA · 50,232#45
@ghera_iq · 8,485#46
@rs_a2 · 10,969#47
@iq_nagma · 1,393#48
@nnaqaa · 14,330#49
@zlowq · 413#50
@MMW28 · 11,839#51
@ashoraa1443 · 2,020#52
@Juli30et · 13,645#53
@Medical_cours1 · 721,406#54
@iraq_boys4 · 231,971#55
@huda1996adil · 63,535#56
@albakeat313 · 1,077#57
@nosadr3 · 157#58
@cczabd · 821#59
@saaudi96 · 9,728#60
@xbaghdad · 28,971#61
@jobmaysan · 26,947#62
@nhjna3l3 · 20,076#63
@mr1_iq · 10,474#64
@iq_s1h · 10,087#65
@myownconspircy · 8,177#66
@ppppee10 · 1,635#67
@galenus_1 · 13,605#68
@ah54321ed73ed · 922#69
@only_signals1 · 4,053#70
@basrahvacancies · 86,687#71
@K99Al · 4,342#72
@Wassitcom6302 · 14,625#73
@dogs · 7,065,215#74
@hamster_kombat · 20,830,171#75
@notcoin · 8,552,225#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@xbaghdad · 28,971
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 September 2026
@amoury1991 · 34,053
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
@bgbbb · 62,728
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
@huda1996adil · 63,535
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“عراق كيكرز 🇮🇶” (@hi_ii), 49,397 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hi_ii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.