Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Отзывы (lansee)

@hh2727k

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002687916129
TypeChannel
Username@hh2727k
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/hh2727k

Growth

57 August 2026 — 5 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:015no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:485first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

8 Mar 2026, 16:58 UTC64 viewsread 13 August 2026

Глаза разбегаются, один из лучших приваток если не лучший

21 Feb 2026, 19:22 UTC68 viewsread 13 August 2026

Приват чоткий инфы больше чем я думал

21 Feb 2026, 09:59 UTC69 viewsread 13 August 2026

Приватка кайф, уже заценил, инфы дохрена🔥

6 Feb 2026, 11:10 UTC70 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ну приватки все ваще ебейшие, выделить могу из всех понравившийся это харда, но по обьему конечно же харда+, все пиздец информативный на пару дней лишь для изучения, стаки препараты гайды и многое другое все что тебя интересует просто, от члена до глаз

6 Feb 2026, 10:37 UTC72 viewsread 13 August 2026

информация полезная, детальная, для тех, кто совсем ничего не знает и не только, очень хорошее введение в дело (лайт приватка)

6 Dec 2025, 13:30 UTC113 viewsread 13 August 2026

Приватки топ 👍👍👍 Много полезной инфы как в лайте так и в миде. Желаю дальнейшего развития

1 Dec 2025, 11:55 UTC118 viewsread 13 August 2026

Купил мид приват, очень много дельной инфы и стаков ещё и в подарок получил лайт, там тоже куча инфы но лучше купить мид.

30 Nov 2025, 21:44 UTC105 viewsread 13 August 2026

Купил мид приват очень рад покупкой интересные посты и много препаратов о которых не знал

30 Nov 2025, 15:06 UTC103 viewsread 13 August 2026

Докупил мидку, она уже поинтереснее лайт уровня но вместе с этим обе приватки друг друга хорошо дополняют и в каждой из них довольно хорошие стаки, приобретением максимально доволен

29 Nov 2025, 10:39 UTC98 viewsread 13 August 2026

Купил лайт приват, за 500 рубликов инфы по горло, пиздата:>

21 Nov 2025, 14:06 UTC105 viewsread 13 August 2026

Заебись, купил приватку мид. Все есть, очень подробно все расписано, ахуенно, советую

21 Nov 2025, 14:06 UTC72 viewsread 13 August 2026

охринел сколько в actea lite инфы, всего-то за 500р уже несколько вещей из приватки купил, вот вот попрет

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hh2727k. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,244,949 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отзывы (lansee)” (@hh2727k), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hh2727k.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.