Channel name was changed to «الفصل السابع»
Channel
الفصل السابع
@hgklp587
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
27subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002146076714 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hgklp587 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2023 and 18 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hgklp587 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Oct 2026, 13:01 | 27 | -2 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 29 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 30 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:47 | 30 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2024 to 29 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/hgklp587
❤1
الاختبار الثاني للفصل الثامن ' 🟡تأثيركومبتن س/ ما تأثير كوبتن ؟ ذاكراً النص والصيغة الرياضية س/ علام يعتمد مقدارالزيادة في الطول الموجي لفوتون الاشعة السينية المستطارة بواسطة الالكترونات الحرة ؟ س/ ما الذي تمثله الكمية (h/(me C)) ؟ وما مقدارها ؟ س/ ما هو تفسير كوبتن للزيادة الحاصة في الطول الموجي للفوتونات الاشعة السينية المستطارة س/ تأثير كومبتن هو احدى الأدلة التي تؤكد السلوك الدقائقي للأشعة الكهرومغناطيسية ؟…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
الاختبار الاول ___اسئلة_الفصل الثامن ___ 🟡 1- ما سبب فشل نموذج رذرفورد للذرة ؟ 2- ما هي فرضيات نموذج بور لذرةالهيدروجين ؟ 3- ما سبب دراسة بور لذرة الهيدروجين ؟ 4- علل : لا يمتلك الألكترون طاقة كافية تجعله يهرب من الذرة 5 اذكر السلاسل التي اكتشفها العلماء في تفسير طيف ذرة الهيدروجين __ 🟡ألاطياف 1- ما هي اهم المصادر الضوئية المستعملة في دراسة الأطياف ؟ 2-أذكر انواع ألاطياف 3- مم يتكون طيف المستمر؟ وكيف يمكن الحصول علي…
🟡س: ما التصوير المجسم (الهولوغرافي ) ؟ وبماذا يتميز عن التصوير العادي ؟ ✅ج: التصوير المجسم يعد من أفضل تقنيات فن التصوير الذي بوساطته يمكن الحصول على صور مجسمة وأقرب ما تكون الى الحقيقة وذات ثلاثة أبعاد (طول وعرض و ارتفاع ) أذ يتم تسجيل سعة الموجات الضوئية المنعكسة من الجسم وطورها ليظهر بثلاثة أبعاد على شبكية العين بينما في التصوير الاعتيادي يتم تسجيل شدة الأشعة فقط .
🟡تصنف منظومات الليزر تبعاً لمستويا الطاقة إلى منظومتين هما: 1. المنظومة ثلاثية المستوى 2. المنظومة رباعية المستوى 🟡س: أيهما افضل لتوليد الليزر منظومة المستويات الثلاثة ام منظومة المستويات الأربعة ولماذا ؟ ✅ج: منظومة المستويات الأربعة افضل ، لأن التوزيع المعكوس في منظومة المستويات الأربعة اسهل مما هو عليه في منظومة المستويات الثلاثة. س: ما هي أنواع الليزر ؟ 1. ليزر الحالة الصلبة (مثل ليزر الياقوت) 2. ليزر الحالة الغاز…
اختر الإجابة الصحيحة : 🟡تكون قدرة الضخ عالية عندما تعمل منظومة الليزر بنظام : ( ثلاث مستويات , مستويين , اربع مستويات ) 🟡صحح الخطا ان وجد دون تغير ما تحته خط: تكون قدرة الضخ عالية عندما تعمل منظومة الليزر بنظام ثلاث مستويات ج: صح
🟡س: ما هي أنواع تقنية الضخ؟ ✅ج: 1) تقنية الضخ الضوئي 2) تقنية الضخ الكهربائي 3) تقنية الضخ الكيميائي
🟡س:ما الفائدة العملية من وجود مرآتان داخل المرنان ؟ ✅ ج: تسمح المرآة ذات الانعكاس الجزئي بنفوذية معينة من الضوء الساقط عليها خارج المرنان أما بقية الضوء فتعكسه مرآة اخرى داخل المرنان لإدامة عملية التضخيم. 🟡تقنية الضخ وهي التقنية التي يمكن بواسطتها تزويد ذرات الوسط الفعال بالطاقة اللازمة لإثارتها ونقلها من مستوى الاستقرار الى مستوى التهيج لكي يتحقق التوزيع المعكوس الذي يضمن توليد الليزر 🟡علل: لا تحتاج تقنية الضخ الكيم…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hgklp587. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@hgklp587 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 13 September 2026 – 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الفصل السابع” (@hgklp587), 27 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hgklp587.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.