Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for HG_Crypto | Channel

Channel

HG_Crypto | Channel

@hgcryptochannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

257subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002376512029
TypeChannel
Username@hgcryptochannel
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/hgcryptochannel

Growth

2572 Sept 2026, 17:46 — 257 subscribers2 Sept 2026, 18:00 — 257 subscribers2 Sept 2026, 17:462 Sept 2026, 18:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 256–258 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 18:00257no change
2 Sept 2026, 17:46257first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 22 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.8%
avg views ÷ 257 subscribers
Avg views / post
38.0
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held15 (22 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total570
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,780
Videos
13
Links
206

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
654.5%
🤣436.4%
🔥19.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 07:32 UTC18 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🔥 FED Watch đảo chiều – thị trường bắt đầu lo ngại tăng lãi suất Hiện tại, FED Watch đang định giá 70.2% khả năng Fed tăng lãi suất, trong khi 29.8% kỳ vọng giữ nguyên. Đáng chú ý, chỉ một tuần trước, tỷ lệ này còn hoàn toàn ngược lại. Tuy nhiên, 15 ngày tới vẫn rất quan trọng khi Nonfarm, CPI và PPI lần lượt được công bố. Nếu dữ liệu lạm phát và kinh tế tiếp tục xấu, kỳ vọng tăng lãi suất có thể còn gia tăng.

2 Sept 2026, 07:10 UTC19 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💰 Saylor đang “chơi” nhà đầu tư nhỏ lẻ. Đăng bài bán ở đáy → tạo tâm lý hoảng loạn. Đăng bài mua ở đỉnh → kích thích FOMO.

2 Sept 2026, 06:03 UTC19 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Hello anh em. Anh em nghỉ lễ đến đâu rồi. Đến hiện tại theo quan điểm của mình là sẽ có 1 nhịp hồi nữa. Nếu nhịp hồi này không bật lên và đóng nến được trên biên trên thì đây là thời điểm short đẹp nhất. Và mình cũng sẽ tiếp tục DCA tiếp ở vùng này.

28 Aug 2026, 04:38 UTC80 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📉 Như anh em đã biết thì hiện tại ad đang vào lệnh Swing Short Kế hoạch trung hạn BTC ad trong thời gian tới BTC vẫn đang tiếp tục đà tăng và mình đang chờ một nhịp tăng cuối cùng lên vùng $82.5K–$84K — đây là vùng Short trên khung thời gian ngày mà mình đang theo dõi. Hiện tại, phân kỳ giảm đang dần hình thành, tạo thêm cơ sở cho ý tưởng Short. 👉 Khi BTC tiến vào vùng $82.5K–$84K và xuất hiện tín hiệu xác nhận

28 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC24 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Câu chuyện nó như thế này này anh em.

1

27 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC32 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🚨 CẢNH BÁO BẢO MẬT ETH TRÊN LEDGER Một lỗ hổng bảo mật nghiêm trọng vừa được phát hiện trong ứng dụng Ethereum trên ví cứng Ledger. Lỗ hổng có thể cho phép ứng dụng độc hại can thiệp và thay đổi thông tin giao dịch ETH trong quá trình ký, trong khi phần thay đổi này không được hiển thị trên màn hình thiết bị Ledger. Điều này có thể khiến người dùng vô tình ký một giao dịch khác với những gì họ nghĩ. 🔒 Ledger đã kh

26 Aug 2026, 01:54 UTC31 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

📊 Hiện tại, ad đang giữ lệnh Short theo dạng swing đối với $BTC do thị trường đang biến động mạnh và xu hướng chưa rõ ràng.

2

25 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC34 viewsread 2 September 2026

Lâu nắm rồi mới thấy một dự án crypto làm ăn tốt như này đấy. Thèeeeeeeeeeeeee

25 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC34 viewsread 2 September 2026

🔥 HYPERLIQUID ĐANG ĐẶT NỀN MÓNG CHO “PERP” TRỞ THÀNH SẢN PHẨM TÀI CHÍNH MAINSTREAM? Ngày 24/8, Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) đã gửi ý kiến tới quá trình tham vấn của SEC–CFTC, đề xuất một cách tiếp cận thống nhất hơn trong việc phân loại perpetual contracts. Điểm mấu chốt: thay vì chỉ nhìn vào tài sản tham chiếu, HPC cho rằng cơ quan quản lý nên xem xét cấu trúc kinh tế và cơ chế vận hành của hợp đồng trước để xá

25 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC34 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🔥Phân tích Bitcoin Khung 4H Bitcoin đang có dấu hiệu nhích lên cao hơn, nhưng nếu nhìn kỹ hơn thì cấu trúc hiện tại vẫn chưa thực sự tích cực. Đỉnh cao mới (Higher High) nhưng đang khá yếu. Đồng thời, RSI đang xuất hiện phân kỳ giảm (Bearish Divergence). Nếu Bitcoin không xuất hiện thêm những cây nến tăng mạnh và dứt khoát hơn, đà tăng hiện tại có nguy cơ suy yếu. 👉BTC đang tăng nhưng lực tăng chưa đủ thuyết ph

25 Aug 2026, 02:26 UTC33 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Tăng mạnh quá k thích đâu. Còn chưa gom đủ hàng mà. Vẫn còn coin để anh em gom nhé. Anh em muốn tham khảo thì liên hệ @HuanGwang_HGC nha

🤣2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @hgcryptochannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 465,684 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HG_Crypto | Channel” (@hgcryptochannel), 257 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hgcryptochannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.