Channel
@hey_Ches
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
112subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001788935520 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hey_Ches |
| Description | ◖хэй, добро пожаловать на мой канал!◗ • я Чес или же Честер, немного закосер и недопонятный гений буду рада новым людям (*＾＾*)// мой тт: _hheynene лс: @hhey_ches |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hey_Ches |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 112 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 112 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 18 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
199 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5357520326467005088 | 82 | 41.2% | |
| custom 5267014194330361316 | 33 | 16.6% | |
| custom 5303221868147262290 | 32 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5208676658571131890 | 11 | 5.53% | |
| custom 5294541202371133866 | 11 | 5.53% | |
| custom 5328093289318987858 | 9 | 4.52% | |
| custom 6325312600129147168 | 8 | 4.02% | |
| custom 5316652784932641438 | 7 | 3.52% | |
| custom 5244578762644804635 | 6 | 3.02% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 199reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2026 to 18 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
13 карт "Старая гадалка..." В ролях: Фёдор Пик Вару Феликс Ромео Зонтик Куромаку Данте
custom 53575203264670050886custom 52670141943303613164custom 53032218681472622903custom 52945412023711338662
Мои дорогие и любимые подписчики, некоторые возможно плохо знают о моей жизни, сейчас я учусь на 2-м курсе по специальности «Психология», и у меня ответственный и важный этап — я пишу курсовую работу. Мне очень нужна ваша помощь! 🆘 Моё исследование посвящено теме: «Образ физического Я (реального и идеального) и самооценка у молодежи с разной степенью вовлечённости в визуальный контент социальных сетей». 🤩 Для участ…
custom 52670141943303613167custom 53032218681472622903custom 52445787626448046351
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Решила угостить Бонни пончиком! Но что-то с этим пончиком явно не так. Ты уверен, что хочешь его? Кажется, начинка сегодня особенная. С 1 апреля! 🌟 Chika 🤩 Bonnie🌟 🌟 FNAF 🌟 Ph
custom 535752032646700508815custom 526701419433036131611custom 53032218681472622906custom 52445787626448046353custom 63253126001291471682
Мои замечательные девушки, поздравляю нас с 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩! Пусть жизнь будет наполнена радостью, вдохновением и новыми достижениями. Каждый день пусть приносит счастье и гордость за свои успехи. Желаю вам оставаться верными себе, уверенно и смело двигаться вперёд, сохраняя свою уникальность и оставаясь теми замечательными девушками, которыми вы являетесь! 🤩 ✨✨✨✨✨✨ • Chicka 🎶 Bonnie • • FNAF • Ph ✨
custom 535752032646700508814custom 53032218681472622908custom 52670141943303613167custom 52945412023711338663custom 52445787626448046352custom 63253126001291471682
🖤🖤🖤 💄₊˚ 🖤🖤🖤 🖤🖤🖤 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟 🎬 ⊹ 🧿 Ты хотел быть один — это быстро прошло Ты хотел быть один, но не смог быть один Твоя ноша легка, но немеет рука И ты встречаешь рассвет за игрой в "Дурака" Доброе утро, последний герой.. 🌟🌟 автор арта вдохновителя ♡ [ photo//rt антон звездочкин олежа душнов ]
custom 53575203264670050885
Ну что за котята , я не могу 🥹
Я обнимаю всех, кто сегодня просыпается с мыслью: «Ну вот, опять одна/один». Но поверьте, быть одному/одной — это не значит быть одиноким/одинокой. Вы нужны себе, вы полны жизни и интересны. Ваша любовь к себе — это как магнит, который обязательно притянет достойного человека. А пока он в пути, наслаждайтесь своим обществом! Также я поздравляю пары, которые просто радуются, что вечером есть с кем обсудить день и уткн…
custom 535752032646700508817custom 530322186814726229012custom 52945412023711338666custom 63253126001291471682
КАКАЯ ВКУСНЯШКА 🙏
custom 53280932893189878581
⭐️💄)🥹𖥻🔠🔤🔠ꞌꞋ⛓️ ̼ 🤩🤩⭐️ ೀ🤩🦷𖡻😀😀😀𖥾 ⭐️⭐️⭐️🥹🩸🤩🤩🤩🤩 😀᭝☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️❓🤩🤩🤩 🦷(🧪ྀིׄ🦷#88sp 🫥🫥🫥〰🪨🐈⬛🤩 🫥🥹🤩🤩🌟
custom 53575203264670050886custom 53280932893189878583
Я не поделилась фотками с празднования дня рождения! Сейчас это не так актуально, но пусть они останутся здесь. 11.01.26. 🌷💗
custom 535752032646700508811custom 520867665857113189010custom 53166527849326414385
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53575203264670050886custom 53280932893189878585custom 63253126001291471682custom 53166527849326414381
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52670141943303613164custom 53575203264670050882custom 52086766585711318901custom 53166527849326414381
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @hey_Ches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 847,082 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ches, which Chester ☕️” (@hey_Ches), 112 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hey_Ches.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.