6 measurements spanning 9 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,786–1,795 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 02:48
1,792
-2
12 Aug 2026, 04:02
1,794
+3
9 Aug 2026, 13:21
1,791
+3
6 Aug 2026, 22:40
1,788
+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:52
1,787
no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:44
1,787
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 8 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
47.1%
avg views ÷ 1,792 subscribers
Avg views / post
844
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held
19 (8 February 2025 – 2 August 2026)
Views total
2,532
Reactions total
102
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
557 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
255
45.8%
🙏
158
28.4%
custom 5255933195886546057
142
25.5%
👎
1
0.18%
😢
1
0.18%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 557reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
35
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
35
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hetoimasia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 February 2025 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В 2021 Метцингер на базе статьи "Страдание" сформулировал мораторий об искусственном страдании — мол, давайте не плодить страдание в мире, давайте не развивать самосознающие ИИ, чтож вы люди делаете-то? В моратории буквально использовал термины типа бхава-танха, аппелировал к этике. Представители индустрии такие этические тэйки, разумеется проигнорировали ("братан, у нас тут возможность навара X10, какая этика? этика…
Что занятно — ошибка приписывания страдания, как и ошибка приписывания самосознания — это та самая проблема "философского зомби". И по этому вопросу в 2011 году буддолог и философ Марк Сидеритс выдал текст с провокационным названием "Будды как зомби: буддийская редукция субъективности". Ну то есть название звучит провокационно для тех, кто не в курсе концепции "философского зомби", а в контексте этой концепции мысль …
Чуть менее, чем десяток лет назад, Томас Метцингер написал статью о страдании — как оно видится с точки зрения его основной нейронаучной теории о "прозрачной Феноменальной Модели Себя", имеющей множество пересечений с анатмавадой. Не удивительно, что и его тэйки о страдании также имеют множество пересечений с буддийским дискурсом, пусть и не совпадают во всех деталях.
А помимо разбора страдания, непостоянства и неве…
Несколько запоздалые интересные переводческие новости — обе от декабря прошлого года и обе — про второстепенные объекты специфического интереса данного канала (Односложную Праджняпарамиту и Уданаваргу).
Во-первых, перевод и комментарий к Односложной Праджняпарамите появились на 84000.co (проект перевода всего Кангьюра, запущенный в 2009 году Дзонгсаром Кхъенце Норбу Ринпоче). Ничего особо нового, просто как факт.
В…
Краткая выжимка по обширной истории джайнизма в виде вступительной статьи к книге Н.А. Железновой "Джайнизм. Энциклопедический словарь" (тираж книги, кстати, всего 200 экземпляров — наверное неплохо было бы оцифровать). Для несведущих в средневековой и относительно современной истории джайнизма — немало удивительного. Типа такого:
Возникновение южноиндийской династии Хойсала (XII–XIV вв.) также связывается с дигамба…
Будда был бритоголовым (часть 2)! То, что иконографический образ Татхагаты отличается от описаний в суттах никай и в сутрах агам, можно увидеть на примере следующих источников:
Сутты, в которых различные брахманы видят Будду и определяют его как бритоголового (muṇḍaka), что вызывает у них предвзятость, поскольку бритоголовость обозначает его статус еретика, а то и вовсе изгоя (поскольку обривание головы, похоже, про…
Интересный пример современного аниконического почитания в Таиланде (с приложенным пэйпером на тему).
Здесь любопытна конвергентная динамика культа вокруг текста Дхармы как тела Будды, когда текст становится объектом почитания. Напоминает историю появления (прото)махаянских школ, сконцентрированных вокруг ступ, в которые вместо останков Будды (как в Великих Ступах) заложены буддийские тексты (которые заменяют/олицетв…
There is a Tai group that practices a unique approach to Buddhism. For the Buddha is so sacred, they dare not to enshrine him in their homes, but rather venerate and build shrines for Dhamma text, emphasising the idea that the Buddha resides in his Dhamma (the Dhammakāya as taught in the Suttas), this group is known as the Tai Zawti:
(Here is an academic article: https://englishkyoto-seas.org/2025/11/earlyview-olivi…
С днём джняны! Два рельефа из Гандхары с сюжетом "Сиддхартха идёт в школу".
То, что сын республиканского вождя наверняка мог получить достойное образование в ведийской Индии — вполне логично. И так как Шуддходана был скорее республиканским вождём, чем царём, а "дворец" наверняка был намного менее впечатляющим, чем это звучит в легендах, то навряд ли Сиддхартха изучал науки "на дому".
Вот и в Гандхаре эпизод "Будущи…
После пятиминутки буддологии — минутка археологии
Медальон-изображение Святилища древа Пробуждения Будды Конагаманы
Махачайтья в Бхархуте, штат Мадхья-Прадеш
Период Шунга, ок. 150–100 гг. до н.э.
Песчаник, 68,6 x 49,5 x 17,1 см
Надпись: Древо Бодхи святого Конагаманы
Обнаружено при раскопках в Бхархуте в юго-восточном квадранте махачайтьи около 1873 г.
Индийский музей, Калькутта (инв. 294)
Среди найденных фрагмент…
🙏13👍11custom 52559331958865460576
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @hetoimasia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2025 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 394,948 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“У Пустого Престола. Свято место пусто” (@hetoimasia), 1,792 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hetoimasia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
