Channel
@hermesslover
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
48subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003848660782 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hermesslover |
| Description | . . . 𝐖𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝗼𝗻𝗲? 𝗜 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗮 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐚 𝐩𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐇𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐝, 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝘀𝘂𝗰𝗸 𝐦𝐲 𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐭 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝐲𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧', 𝗯𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵, 𝐈'𝐥𝐥 𝐧𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐭 ˙ . ꒷ : . 𖦹˙— @Apollo_sun_ray (luv my brother from another mother 🤫) |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 21 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hermesslover |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 48 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:19 | 48 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
125 reactions across 10 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 26 | 20.8% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 15.2% | |
| 💋 | 16 | 12.8% | |
| 🍌 | 10 | 8.00% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 7.20% | |
| 😎 | 9 | 7.20% | |
| 🍓 | 8 | 6.40% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 5.60% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 4.80% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 4.00% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 2.40% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 2.40% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 1.60% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.8% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hermesslover. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2026 to 8 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
➿➿➿ ❤️атейница Инета вновь решилась устроить новую шалость; а вы осведомлены, как сильно я люблю интересные активности! На сей раз у нас интерактив, в коем следует указать при помощи цветных стрел свое отношение к указанным смертным аль бессмертным душам. Твоя фантазия не может не впечатлять, сестрица! Ну что, нашли себя на картинке? 📖 ➖ ➖➖➖ 😀😀 😀😀𝐈 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐠𝐞 😀😀𝐖𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐦𝐚𝐤…
⚡6🏆6🔥6🍓1💋1🕊1😎1
꒷.⌗ — ❤️оглядите-ка, кто сызнова соблаговолил выйти на связь! Да-да, вы не ошиблись — я собственной персоной! 🪽 Уж больно долго я был полон забот, что аж не мог найти и мгновение покоя. Однако... Это кануло в прошлое! Отныне я опять с вами и торжественно клянусь постараться не пропадать на столь долгое время. Хотя, разумеете ли полагать, известный всем Одиссей был в «спящем режиме» целых 20 лет (для нас, богов, это…
⚡6💋6❤🔥4🔥3💅1🕊1🤝1
Sticker, posted without a caption
➿➿➿ ❤️ главой окунувшись в самую пучину океана дел, совсем уж позабыл изречь свое довольство публично касаемо итогов сего интерактива от моего братца. Дивное создание! Пушистое, обаятельное и большеокое. Прямо как я 😉 Помнится мне, в комментариях великий пророк Тиресий смущенно шепнул, что мои кудри столь же мягкие, как и шерстка этого самого мотылька-🐩! ➖ ➖➖➖ 😀😀 😀😀𝐈 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐬…
❤🔥4💋3🔥2🍌1🍓1💘1😎1
⚜️: Мотылек-пудель — Гермес! Просто потому, что его запрос — единственный, над кем я могу и умилиться, и поиздеваться. Только так и вижу своего дорогого братца🐩
❤2
🖤🖤🖤 🖤 ❤️бнаружено новое 🖤 тайное послание 🤩 Гᴇᴩʍᴇᴄ, ᴄᴋᴀжи чᴇᴄᴛнᴏ. Еᴄᴛь ᴧи чᴛᴏ-ᴛᴏ, чᴛᴏ ᴛᴇбᴇ бᴏᴧьɯᴇ ʙᴄᴇᴦᴏ хᴏᴛᴇᴧᴏᴄь бы ᴄᴨᴇᴩᴇᴛь у ᴋᴀᴋᴏᴦᴏ-ᴛᴏ Бᴏᴦᴀ, нᴏ ᴨᴏ ᴋᴀᴋᴏй-ᴛᴏ ᴨᴩичинᴇ нᴇ ʍᴏжᴇɯь? Коли будет моя охота — ни одну вещь от меня не упрячет даже самый зоркий олимпиец! В моих руках были и Аполлоново стадо (практически с самого моего рождения, попрошу заметить😏!), и острый трезубец Посейдона, и Аресов кровавый меч, и …
⚡8🍌4🔥3💋2❤1🍓1💅1💘1
🖤🖤🖤 🖤 ❤️бнаружено новое 🖤 тайное послание 🤩 Пᴏчᴇʍу Гᴇᴩу ᴛы ʍнᴏᴦᴏᴋᴩᴀᴛнᴏ нᴀɜыʙᴀᴇɯь ʍᴀᴛᴇᴩью, ᴀ Зᴇʙᴄᴀ ни ᴩᴀɜу нᴇ иʍᴇнᴏʙᴀᴧ ᴏᴛцᴏʍ? Зᴀбᴀʙнᴏ ϶ᴛᴏ нᴀбᴧюдᴀᴛь, учиᴛыʙᴀя, чᴛᴏ Зᴇʙᴄ — ᴛʙᴏй ᴩᴏднᴏй ᴏᴛᴇц, ᴀ Гᴇᴩᴀ — ᴨᴩиᴇʍнᴀя ʍᴀᴛь. Несведущий читатель! Лучше ответь: помнит ли сам Зевес о том, когда в последний раз он относился ко мне, как к сыну? Лично меня в этом вопросе память, видно, подводит! 🖼 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 …
⚡3🍌3😁3❤1🍓1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🖤🖤🖤 🖤 ❤️бнаружено новое 🖤 тайное послание 🤩 йᴏу, Лᴏᴩд Гᴇᴩʍᴇᴄ, ʙᴄᴇх бᴧᴀᴦ! Я ᴄ ʙᴏᴨᴩᴏᴄᴏʍ : ᴀ ᴋᴀᴋ ʙы ᴏᴛнᴏᴄиᴛᴇᴄь ᴋ ᴄʙᴏᴇй ʍᴀᴛᴇᴩи Мᴀйᴇ и дᴩуᴦиʍ ᴨᴧᴇядᴀʍ?? Ах, Майя! 🖤 Моя милая, добрая матушка! Не могу мыслить о ней ничего дурного, ибо мне известно о ее персоне исключительно светлое. Мы никогда не были близки, я знал ее лишь малую часть детской наивной поры, а будучи "взрослым" да статным богом навещал лишь изре…
🔥2💋1💯1
꒷.⌗ — ❤️еликолепный и непревзойдённый я, два брата-акробата и РЕЗКО мама 🤍 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🪽 ୨🪽🪽 🪽🪽 ৎ
😎6⚡2🍓2🕊2❤🔥1🏆1💋1💘1
⚜️: Гермес, Дионис, ну мы🌅 °•. Pray to me .•°
❤2🍌1🍓1💋1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @hermesslover. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 826,318 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𐔌 ⋮ 𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐌𝐄𝐒 ☤ 𝐬lay 𝐠ossip 🪽” (@hermesslover), 48 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hermesslover.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.