Channel
@herculis_investments
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
760subscribers
-139 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001708472852 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @herculis_investments |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/herculis_investments |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:42 | 760 | -21 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 781 | -15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 796 | -23 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 819 | -30 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 849 | -50 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 899 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:20 | 899 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
819 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 8.79% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥱 | 72 | 8.79% | |
| 🤮 | 70 | 8.55% | |
| 🤬 | 68 | 8.30% | |
| 😢 | 65 | 7.94% | |
| 🖕 | 62 | 7.57% | |
| 💩 | 61 | 7.45% | |
| 🍌 | 59 | 7.20% | |
| 👎 | 59 | 7.20% | |
| 😡 | 54 | 6.59% | |
| ❤ | 53 | 6.47% | |
| 💔 | 51 | 6.23% | |
| 😈 | 44 | 5.37% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 4.40% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 3.79% | |
| 🥰 | 16 | 1.95% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 1.34% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.366% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.244% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.244% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 819 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The 30-year U.S. Treasury yield has surpassed 5.2%, returning to levels last seen before the 2008 financial crisis. The implied 10-year-to-10-year Treasury yield has reached approximately 6.24%, its highest level since 2004. A U.S. Treasury yield of 5% or higher has historically been viewed as a critically important psychological threshold—not only for the bond market, but also for risk assets such as equities and c…
👍4❤2🔥2
For decades, Japan has combined near-zero interest rates, a weak currency, colossal public debt, and massive capital exports. This framework has helped finance U.S. bonds, international credit, global equity markets, and a multitude of carry trade strategies. That source is beginning to dry up. The yield on 10-year Japanese bonds now stands at around 2.8%, up from about 1% in 2024, after recently reaching 2.90%, its …
❤4👏2👍1🥰1
For fifteen years, investors have gauged China’s success by comparing the CSI 300 to the S&P 500. Since Wall Street was rising faster, they concluded that the American model had won and that China had failed. Meanwhile, China was building power grids, battery supply chains, robot factories, data centers, artificial intelligence models, memory industry leaders, and, now, its first immersion lithography machines. The C…
👍4👏2❤1🔥1
The Tehran-backed Yemeni Houthis said they would impose a maritime blockade on Saudi Arabia, putting at risk the flow of millions of barrels that the kingdom exports via the Red Sea. The move would add greater pressure on the US as it seeks to bomb Iran into submission over control of the Strait of Hormuz. Oil prices rose during a fraught day of trading. Saudi Arabia diverted its oil supplies to the key Red Sea port …
❤5🔥2
Japan's 10-year government bond yield has climbed to its highest level since 1996, around 2.7%, up sharply from near-zero levels held for most of the 2015-2021 period. Japan's rise in government bond yields marks a structural shift after years of ultra-loose monetary policy. As the world's largest creditor nation, higher domestic yields could encourage Japanese institutional investors to repatriate capital from over…
❤4🥰3🔥2
China bought 480,000 ounces of gold in June, its 20th consecutive month of buying and its largest single purchase since October 2023. The post argues that in two decades of resource-deal financing, a bull market has never died while the largest, slowest institutional money on earth was accelerating its buying. China's continued accumulation highlights that central bank demand remains structurally driven rather than …
❤4👌3🐳2
Herculis Gold Coin ($XAUH) @HerculisCoin Jul 9 Foreign Investors Are Dumping South Korean Equities at a Record Pace Global equity funds sold $8 billion worth of South Korean stocks in July, averaging approximately $1.6 billion in net outflows per trading day. This follows $30 billion in capital outflows recorded in June—the largest monthly sell-off on record. Since the beginning of the year, global funds have sold mo…
👍4🥰3🔥2
BofA highlights what it calls "a generational transfer in free cash flow." Forward 12-month FCF for semiconductor companies (Nvidia, Micron, Broadcom, Applied Materials) is projected to surge past $400bn, overtaking hyperscalers (Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle), whose forward FCF has collapsed toward negative territory as AI infrastructure spending outpaces their cash generation. The AI value chain is enter…
👍4🔥3❤2
According to Citadel Securities, retail investors' risk appetite has reached a record high. Zero-day-to-expiration (0DTE) options now account for a record 48% of total retail options trading volume. Over the past five years, this share has more than tripled. Moreover, in May, 0DTE options represented a record 30% of all options trading volume in the U.S. 0DTE options are highly speculative and extremely volatile ins…
❤3👏3🔥2
Gold allocations are at multi-decade highs, and they're still tiny. Private investors hold just 2.7% of financial assets in gold. In 1980 it was 8.3%. Central banks sit at 26.6% versus 62.4% back then. The historical comparison suggests that the current bull market is being driven more by official-sector demand than by retail participation. While central banks have been accumulating gold at one of the fastest ra…
❤4👍2🔥2
For 5,000 years, gold was humanity's ultimate safe haven. Bitcoin promised a digital alternative. Yet in 2026, investors are selling both to buy AI. Since April, roughly $12B has flowed out of U.S. gold and Bitcoin funds, while semiconductor funds attracted about $20B. The market is redefining what it considers a store of value, shifting from protection to innovation. But beneath the headlines, central banks continue…
🥰4❤2🔥2
Monthly tokenized stock trading volume reached a record $5.3 billion last month, up 44% month-over-month. On Solana, cumulative tokenized stock transfers have officially surpassed $10 billion for the first time. In just one month, tokenized equity trading on Solana surged 180%, fueled by growing demand for tokenized real-world assets (RWAs). One-third of traders are now active over the weekend. The rapid adoption of…
👍4🔥2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @herculis_investments. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@herculis_investments named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Herculis Gold Coin ($XAUH)” (@herculis_investments), 760 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/herculis_investments.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.