Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

헨리킴

@henrygaeko

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,197subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001489605227
TypeChannel
Username@henrygaeko
Created5 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/henrygaeko

Growth

2,1972,1982,197.56 August 2026 — 2,198 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,197 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,198 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,197 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,197–2,198 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:152,197-1
10 Aug 2026, 01:012,198+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:402,197-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:492,198first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.04%
avg views ÷ 2,197 subscribers
Avg views / post
133
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (15 July 202631 July 2026)
Views total2,256
Reactions total48
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

54 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4888.9%
👍35.56%
🔥23.70%
11.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC40 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tiger_researchPhoto

[7/31 DeFi 시황] "유니스왑, 수수료 스위치(Fee Switch) 가동 후 일 매출 3배 급증" DeFi/Stablecoin @HenryKim ✅ 주요 소식 1/ Uniswap, v4 수수료 스위치 가동 후 일 매출 3배 급증($32.5만) & 토큰 발행 집계 탭 'Launches' 출시 2/ Polygon, 일본 거대 전력사(간사이 전력) 포인트의 엔화 스테이블코인(JPYC) 온체인 전환 지원 👍 Henry's Comment 유니스왑(Uniswap)의 v4 수수료 스위치(Fee Switch) 전면 확장 이후, 단 사흘 만에 일일 프로토콜 매출이 3배 가까이 늘어나며 하루 32만 5,000달러 선을 넘어섰습니다. 매출 급증의 절반 이상은 로빈후드 체인(Robinhood Chain)에서 유입되었으며, 확보된 수수료 전액은 UN

4

30 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC44 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tiger_researchPhoto

[7/30 DeFi 시황] "렌딩 프로토콜의 비즈니스 트렌드가 바뀌었다"… 6개 체인·50개 자산 대대적 오프보딩 결정한 아베 DeFi/Stablecoin @HenryKim ✅ 주요 소식 1/ Aave V3, 비효율 자산 50개 및 6개 체인(Sonic·Scroll 등) 전면 오프보딩 제안… $9,810만 자금 영향 2/ Morpho, 홍콩 해시키(HashKey) HSK 체인과 파트너십… 기관급 CeDeFi 대출 인프라 확장 👍 Henry's Comment 아베(Aave)가 저활성화 자산 50개와 만기된 Pendle PT 21개, 그리고 Sonic, Scroll, zkSync, Metis, Soneium, Aptos 등 6개 체인 배포 전체를 종료(Offboarding)하는 대규모 리스크 축소안을 발표했습니다. 영향을 받는 자산만 공

3🔥2

29 Jul 2026, 06:58 UTC47 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tiger_researchPhoto

🎯 259억 달러 규모 시장에 경고 던진 SEC, 리스크 큐레이터는 왜 표적이 되었는가? 🟠SEC에서 온체인 볼트에 기존 증권법 논리가 상품별 사실관계에 따라 적용될 수 있다는 성명을 발표했습니다. 넓게 적용하면 볼트·큐레이터를 넘어 재량 기반 상품 전반, 약 259억 달러 상당의 시장까지 잠재적 영향권에 들어갑니다. 🟠SEC는 규제 바깥에 있는 코드를 겨냥하는 것이 아니라 재량권을 행사하는 주체를 겨냥합니다. 🟠스테이크하우스 파이낸셜, 메이플 파이낸스 등 규제 친화적 DeFi를 빌딩하는 팀들은 이미 이러한 부분에 대해 의식하고 대응해왔습니다. 🟠역사적으로 비슷한 사례를 살펴보면, 결국 기존 증권법 체계 내에 완전한 정식 등록을 완료하거나 새로운 법적 면제 규정을 입법화하는 것만이 답이었습니다. 🟠결국 지금의 대응은 잠깐 시간을 벌어

41

28 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC50 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tiger_researchPhoto

[7/28 DeFi 시황] "팬텀의 짝사랑이었나?"… 모나드와 이별 고한 팬텀 DeFi/Stablecoin @HenryKim ✅ 주요 소식 1/ Phantom, 고성능 EVM '모나드(Monad)' 지원 중단 발표… '로빈후드 체인' 등 RWA·실질 유즈케이스 집중 2/ Ondo Finance, CEX급 거래 속도와 프라이버시 구현한 실행 레이어 'Ondo Network' 가동 👍 Henry's Comment 팬텀(Phantom)의 모나드(Monad) 지원 중단 소식 뒤에는, 라이벌 간의 치열한 암투와 '서운함'이라는 정치가 깔려 있지 않나 싶습니다. 솔라나 대표 암호화폐 지갑 팬텀(Phantom)이 메인넷 출시 9개월 만에 대형 EVM 프로젝트였던 모나드(Monad) 지원 중단을 선언했습니다. 팬텀은 모나드의 테스트넷 시절부터

5

27 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC53 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tiger_researchPhoto

[7/27 DeFi 시황] 국내 금융의 온체인 대전환… JP모건 블록체인 결제망 채택한 KB, JitoSOL 가져온 웨이브릿지 DeFi/Stablecoin @HenryKim ✅ 주요 소식 1/ KB국민은행, JP모건 'Kinexys' 블록체인 망 기반 무역 결제·해외송금 서비스 내달 출시 2/ 웨이브릿지·지토 재단, 지토SOL(JitoSOL) 기반 국내 기관용 디지털자산 상품 개발 MOU 👍 Henry's Comment 국내 전통 금융과 핀테크 인프라 기업들이 글로벌 검증을 마친 블록체인 레일을 제도권 안으로 들여오고 있습니다. KB국민은행이 국내 금융사 최초로 JP모건의 블록체인 결제망인 Kinexys(구 오닉스)를 도입해 B2B 무역 결제망을 가동합니다. 기존 SWIFT 망의 시차와 수수료 비효율을 블록체인 레일로 대체하는 실질

👍3

26 Jul 2026, 22:51 UTC108 viewsread 7 August 2026

바람의나라, 리니지의 초기 개발자 송재경님이 X 계정 해킹을 당한 걸로 보이네요 해킹한 사람이 OpenMMO라는 토큰의 CA를 홍보한 걸로 보이니 주의하시길 바랍니다. https://x.com/i/status/2081072903169491349

26 Jul 2026, 02:05 UTC106 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

모듈형 렌딩 프로토콜이 대세가 되며 타이거리서치에서 Morpho와 Euler, Aave에 대해 다룬 바 있는데요, 이중 Morpho와 Euler 모두 주말 사이에 업비트에 상장을 했네요! 이들이 어떤 구조로 렌딩 프로토콜을 모듈화하고 진화시키고 있는지 해당 리포트를 통해 알아보시죠 ㅎㅎ LINK

2

24 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC82 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tiger_researchPhoto

[7/24 DeFi 시황] "너도 멸종되지 않게 조심해" BitMEX의 퇴장… 체질 개선을 시작한 시장 DeFi/Stablecoin @HenryKim ✅ 주요 소식 1/ BitMEX, 오는 9월 23일 서비스 전면 중단 공식 발표… 11년 역사 마감 2/ Kaito AI, X(트위터)와 공식 데이터 협력 계약 체결… 'InfoFi, 미워도 다시 한 번? 👍 Henry's Comment 오늘은 DeFi에 대한 소식은 잠시 미뤄두고, 파생상품 거래소의 원조격인 BitMex의 쓸쓸한 퇴장과 더불어 InfoFi의 부활 가능성에 대해 다뤄보고자 합니다. 크립토 파생상품 시장의 기틀을 잡았던 BitMEX가 오는 9월 23일 서비스를 전면 종료한다고 합니다. 최초로 100배 레버리지 무기한 선물을 선보이며 시장을 지배했던 CEX의 한 시대가

3

23 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC61 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tiger_researchPhoto

[7/23 DeFi 시황] "SEC, 온체인 볼트에 규제 칼날 빼드나"… 계속되는 디파이 잔혹사 DeFi/Stablecoin @HenryKim ✅ 주요 소식 1/ SEC 피어스 위원, 온체인 볼트·대출 전략 증권법 적용 가능성 경고 2/ AFX Trade, 아비트럼 자체 보유 브릿지 해킹으로 2,415만 달러(USDC) 유출 👍 Henry's Comment 헤스터 피어스 SEC 위원이 '볼트(Vault)'에 규제 경고를 던졌습니다. 큐레이터나 매니저가 자산 재조정과 투자 전략에 개입하는 구조는 전통 증권법상 투자회사 및 투자자문사에 해당할 수 있다는 지적입니다. 다만 모포같은 볼트 자체는 누구나 마켓을 생성하는 '무허가 대출 인프라' 레이어입니다. 실질적인 규제 리스크는 주관적 판단으로 자금을 굴리며 사용자 자금에 대한 재량권을

3

23 Jul 2026, 00:45 UTC62 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🟢 삼성전자, 삼성월렛에 스테이블코인 도입 예고 | 산업·파트너십 삼성전자가 삼성월렛에 스테이블코인을 지원할 계획을 발표했다. 이를 통해 삼성월렛은 결제와 리워드, 디지털 자산을 통합하는 금융 생태계의 핵심 플랫폼으로 확장될 예정이다.

22 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC66 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tiger_researchPhoto

[7/22 DeFi 시황] "고정금리는 오케이, 토큰화 주식의 자본 효율화는 글쎄", 온체인도 예측 가능해야 한다 DeFi/Stablecoin @HenryKim ✅ 주요 소식 1/ Morpho, Base에 고정금리·고정만기 대출 프로토콜 'Midnight' 정식 가동 2/ Ondo, OndoPerps서 토큰화 주식(SPYon·QQQon) 마진 담보 공식 지원 👍 Henry's Comment 오늘 소식들은 온체인 자본 효율성을 극대화하기 위한 '담보 자산의 진화'와 '예측 가능성'이라는 새로운 패러다임을 보여줍니다. 예고되어 오던 모포(Morpho)의 '미드나이트' 출시는 변동금리 중심이던 디파이 대출에 고정금리를 도입하여 기관이 선호하는 예측 가능성을 제공하려는 의도입니다. 결국 토큰화 주식을 포함한 RWA 자산 역시 이러한 구조

2

22 Jul 2026, 08:22 UTC85 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

재미있게 읽어주시면 감사하겠습니다.

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @henrygaeko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 20,162 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“헨리킴” (@henrygaeko), 2,197 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/henrygaeko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.