Вид на стелу через прореху в другой. Цибильчальтун. Славные воспоминания.
❤13

Channel
@helidonisma
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
75subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001591843327 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @helidonisma |
| Description | древние майя, мифология и немного о науке, жизни и жизни в науке (мои первые шажки) |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/helidonisma |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 75 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 75 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (7 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 365 |
| Reactions total | 50 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
126 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 79 | 62.7% | |
| custom 5458707294944500893 | 21 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5235686393635679301 | 16 | 12.7% | |
| custom 5235589164166032324 | 4 | 3.17% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.38% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 1.59% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.794% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вид на стелу через прореху в другой. Цибильчальтун. Славные воспоминания.
❤13
‼️ TW: арахнофобам - осторожнее! 🕷 Обещала - показываю. Первая часть бестиария с поездки - страшилки - самое то на ночь! Это те самые пауки - фрины - обитающие в глубинах Здания лабиринта в Йашчилане. Как я уже говорила, они совершенно безобидные, однако выглядят вполне устрашающе, особенно в естественном антураже. Стоит ли говорить, какой холодок прошелся по телу при встрече... Это еще что! Первый паучок…
custom 52356863936356793018custom 54587072949445008933
❤️❤️❤️ после Мексики Мне не сиделось и я съездила на пару деньков в место без времени - Гнездово. Этот археологический комплекс эпохи викингов каждый год влечет к себе множество людей, отдающих себя на ниве археологии, а взамен получающих незабываемые впечатления. Третий год, пусть и недолго, но я неизменно возвращаюсь тоже. К сожалению, в этот раз извне беспощадное время утащило меня назад очень скоро.. 🤍 н…
❤8custom 52355891641660323244🗿2
Сегодня путешествие окончено. Мы приземлились в Москве. Незабываемое приключение. Требуются регулярные повторения. (продолжу про дни чуть позже)
❤11😭1
День 11. Йашчилан и Бонампак. Часть 2 Путь вел нас в лакандонскую сельву. Согласно устоявшемуся порядку, все туры в Бонампак проходят через местных. Таким образом с нашего рейсового автобасиса, промчавшегося через весь Чьяпас, нас рассадили по тарантайкам с водителем лакандоном в каждой, и мы двинулись в сельву. Деревья там вздымаются до небес, всюду свисают лианы, стоит гул всяческой живности, населяющей эти благод…
❤12
отдельно будет подборка и фотографий, и видео, а также отдельную рубрику посвящу фауне! так что всех виденных прекрасных и ужасных созданий и вы увидите тоже!
custom 52356863936356793014custom 54587072949445008934
День 11. Йашчилан и Бонампак. Часть 1 Самое главное приключение ждало нас именно в этот день. Это не было простой поездкой на памятник, даже включая автобусы и прочее, это было настоящим Путем и приключением. Пройдя его, я поняла, что теперь готова к многому и в следующий приезд не буду бояться добираться до отдаленных мест. Первым делом в пять утра мы двинулись долгой дорогой, ведущей через штат Чьяпас к границе …
❤7🔥3custom 52356863936356793013
жёстко сгонял в Йашчилан... ну и так далее мы сошли с ума временно, но было весело
❤6
кто бы сказал, что через полтора года мы действительно жёстко сгоняем в настоящий Йашчилан... 🤯 (тогда мы просто придумали этот прикол и вот чем он обернулся)
custom 54587072949445008934
День 10. Паленке Я уже примерно описала тот тыгыдык, который нам пришлось совершить, приехав сюда. однако, хочу отметить, что меня чуть запугали сложностью поездок, а потом приободрили, в итоге же подобные перемещения вовсе не оказались какими-то невозможными. Единственное, планировать заранее все же придется)) Хотя не обошлось мы и без экспромтов, впрочем как и всегда Паленке - не только древнее городище, но ещё …
❤11custom 54587072949445008932
прыгнули в сенот с высоты трёх метров! весело, мощно, но одного раза хватит вполне впечатлиться (я прыгнула дважды)
custom 54587072949445008938custom 52356863936356793011
День 9. Шкалумкин Моим первым городищем майя стал Шкалумкин. Наверное, я бы слегка удивилась, если бы мне кто-то сказал об этом пару месяцев назад. Начнем с того, что я вообще бы поразилась возможностью ступить на эту землю)) Шкалумкин - это позднеклассический город, со своей особенной историей, проявляющейся как в системе управления, так и в записи текстов. Им управляли несколько линиджей сахалей (в классику - вас…
❤11
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @helidonisma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 394,074 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хелидонисма” (@helidonisma), 75 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/helidonisma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.