Done. ✔️

Channel
Challenges
@helichallanges
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003876842554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @helichallanges |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/helichallanges |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:01 | 5 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 7 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 6 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 6 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 38.9% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
+ دیلیت فانه، وایب ژاپن میده. - پروفایلو ببندی بهتر میشه. https://t.me/meow_mawii
+ دیلی شمام خوجگل موجگله. - یکم شلوغه بین پستا فاصله بزار. https://t.me/ksnxksn7skdkld
دیلیت تنوع داره، از اوناست که آدم دوست داره بخونه. https://t.me/neginega
💘1
چقدر هنرمندی شما. ✨️ ایرادی ندیدم. https://t.me/gazhdahamart
🔥1
+ تمِ آبی چنلت زیباست و تکستات مودن. - جواب چالشا رو تو چنل جدا بزاری بهتر میشه. https://t.me/Ava_talks
چنل کیوتی داری، شبیه دفترچه خاطراته. ایرادی نمیگیرم چون دیلیه. https://t.me/dabriatasian
پستارو خوندم خیلی جالب بودن. چنل تم داره و مرتبه. ایرادی ندیدم فقط بین پستا فاصله باشه بهترم میشه. https://t.me/destinyy_time
🥰1
همه چیز خوشگل و مرتب و عالی. ایرادی ندیدم. https://t.me/vunlx
💋1
+ با محتوای دیلیت ممبرات دیگه اکسپلور نیاز ندارن. - تکست و آهنگم بزار. https://t.me/doomer_618
+ سریالایی که معرفی کردی و نظراتت دربارهشون جالبه. - آهنگ بیشتر بزار. https://t.me/Bxharr
❤🔥1
استیکر و سیمبلایی که بین پستا استفاده میکنی خیلی قشنگن. چنل تم داره و شلوغ نیست. ایرادی ندیدم. https://t.me/ajajajajaajk
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @helichallanges. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ajajajajaajk · 171 postᴀᴠᴀ ᴛᴀʟᴋꜱ
@Ava_talks · 561 postㅤ𝖡𝖫𝖴𝖤ㅤ
@bitterness_me · 1021 post-Her Ultraviolence
@Bxharr · 1341 postخدای معبد پیشولیان
@dabriatasian · 291 post'Destiny'
@destinyy_time · 3981 postdoomeR🍓
@doomer_618 · 481 postᅟ
@Dueor · 231 post^شمعدونی گژدهم 🕯️^
@gazhdahamart · 4891 post$incerely, Her
@Glitter_and_Grief · 2421 postSupernova
@im_a_supernova · 271 post𝘐'𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮 𝘪𝘵'𝘴 𝘮𝘦
@justcallmeblitz · 1551 postヤ𝙈e𝙤wme˖࣪𖧧𓂃🪨
@meow_mawii · 2241 postA La Derniere minuter
@neginega · 1451 post𝔰𝔦𝔩𝔢𝔫𝔱 𝔰𝔱𝔞𝔯
@silentstar18 · 571 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@helichallanges named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 12 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Challenges” (@helichallanges), 5 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/helichallanges.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.