Channel
@helbc0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
148subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004345832443 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @helbc0 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/helbc0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 148 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 147 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 147 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (31 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,109 |
| Reactions total | 163 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
163 reactions across 10 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5192928697123894335 | 34 | 20.9% | |
| custom 5229039506543367638 | 24 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5384486974419666219 | 24 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5296448949534626331 | 18 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5343719226450385808 | 17 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5354872741122043766 | 10 | 6.13% | |
| custom 5373336195642198533 | 8 | 4.91% | |
| custom 5427244335924016499 | 7 | 4.29% | |
| custom 5291773976417163080 | 6 | 3.68% | |
| custom 5348458765811217755 | 6 | 3.68% | |
| custom 5296490533407985607 | 3 | 1.84% | |
| custom 5424597751306421342 | 3 | 1.84% | |
| custom 5323295948288321109 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| custom 5355326955388430297 | 1 | 0.613% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @helbc0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
всем отправила! не хочу чтоб ники выигравших были в общем доступе, но на всякий случай фото в комментариях.
custom 53548727411220437666custom 52964489495346263313custom 53437192264503858083custom 52964905334079856071
⭐️⭐️“🔤ривет, простите, я не сдержалась. Фанкаст Риты и Беллы слишком хорошо смотрится друг с другом. Видео с Беллой и Гермой сегодня тоже будет” #quillkiller ' ⚔️ heina black
custom 53437192264503858086
культ #написанныеобществом
custom 529644894953462633110custom 53437192264503858082
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 итак! история от @mertvvgrr & @helbc0 вторая глава уже на фб: https://ficbook.net/readfic/019fb78f-1666-76ce-941b-ea694542ada6/ #фф #ии #написанныеобществом
custom 538448697441966621911custom 52290395065433676384custom 53733361956421985334custom 52917739764171630802custom 53437192264503858082custom 54272443359240164992custom 52964489495346263311custom 52964905334079856071
у нашей Беллы появился тик ток, не могу не поделиться с вами этим
custom 53733361956421985333custom 52917739764171630801custom 53437192264503858081custom 53844869744196662191custom 54272443359240164991
оказывается в канал кто то голосовал:) поставила временно побольше реакций и обои
custom 538448697441966621912custom 54272443359240164994custom 52917739764171630803custom 52964905334079856071custom 53553269553884302971custom 53733361956421985331
Posted without readable text
могу гордо сказать что спиздила идею у своей любимой мастоквок❤️ id: https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4LN5VYN/ #bellamione
custom 519292869712389433513custom 52290395065433676383custom 53484587658112177552custom 52964489495346263311custom 53232959482883211091custom 53437192264503858081custom 53548727411220437661custom 54245977513064213421
Я целую руки этой девушки 🙏🏻 И мисс ловетт за ее приожки
custom 519292869712389433512custom 53437192264503858082custom 53484587658112177552custom 53548727411220437662
Пока пытаюсь сделать переписку вот такое накалякала Задумка с огнём была очень классная, а осуществилось, как осуществилось💋
custom 51929286971238943358custom 52290395065433676382custom 53484587658112177551
helbc0 pinned a photo
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 итак! история от @mertvvgrr & @helbc0 первая глава уже на фб: https://ficbook.net/readfic/019fb78f-1666-76ce-941b-ea694542ada6/ #фф #ии #написанныеобществом
custom 522903950654336763815custom 52964489495346263313custom 54245977513064213422custom 51929286971238943351custom 53232959482883211091custom 53484587658112177551custom 53548727411220437661
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @helbc0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 85,739 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“helbc0” (@helbc0), 148 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/helbc0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.