aka刀枪不入为什么会在马来西亚当街被围殴?这位抖音网红平时靠硬汉人设吸粉61.6万,视频里动辄放狠话、自称刀枪不入,结果现实中与人发生冲突后,直接被多人团团围住推搡、踢打,完全无法还手,被按在地上狼狈挨揍。视频迅速流传,网友一片震惊:线上吹牛逼的狠角色,线下竟如此不堪一击?这起事件瞬间成为全网热议焦点,狠狠打脸了他的硬汉形象。
Channel
吃瓜黑料曝光新闻大事件
@heiliao100
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
665subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002522944970 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @heiliao100 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/heiliao100 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 665 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 665 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 662 | first reading |
Engagement
2 posts held, back to 28 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 274
- Videos
- 87
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 6m 53s
- Average length
- 3m 27s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
瓜友们,最近娱乐圈又掀起一场实锤级情感风暴。黄一鸣作为曾经与王思聪有过公开恋情的网红女孩,这次被相恋16年的前男友直接在网上长文痛诉,从相识到分手的全过程被一一揭开。表面光鲜的她,背后却有多次出轨、被多金人士包养等争议,让不少吃瓜群众直呼“反转太大了”。社交平台曝光截图一览 从图片来看,黄一鸣的抖音个人主页显示“从此只做大灰狼”,粉丝数395,获赞1333。另一张她长发甜美自拍,笑容明媚,与网友印象中的形象一致。还有前男友发布的长文截图,以及评论区网友热议“黄一鸣”“下头男”等讨论。整体画面真实记录了事件发酵的现场,评论区已有数百条回复,大家从不同角度分析双方说法,氛围十分热闹。
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @heiliao100. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 989,423 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吃瓜黑料曝光新闻大事件” (@heiliao100), 665 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/heiliao100.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.