Channel
@hefei899888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,125subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004433016349 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hefei899888 |
| Created | 29 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hefei899888 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 1,125 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 1,130 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 1,129 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (29 June 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,983 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【验证留名】：哲 【验证老师】：小糖果 @tangguo78998 双向 @tangguo6688bot 【验证时间】：8.1 【修车水费】：6p 【服务内容】：课表一致 【颜值身材】：9分 【体验细节】：人照九分吧，本人看起来比照片舒服。全妆的老师非常好看。全程下来基本不冷场。说话都带着哥哥，少女感十足，。可以🐍可以69。洗完澡还可以在老师手机选服装，好评。玉足小脚，还涂了粉色的指甲油。足控的我沦陷了。老师的玉穴又小，进去还会夹人。我说我怕秒了，老师还说叫我慢点。后面还是被秒了，哈哈。做完又不催钟，后面还有糖果饼干吃，舒服。下次二返应该来个pp了。好评
【验证留名】：林秀 【验证老师】：恩琪 @enqi88888 【验证时间】：7.31 【修车水费】：11pp 【服务内容】：陪洗啊 口啊 调情都有 【颜值身材】：8.5分 【体验细节】：到了时间。位置也挺好找的，下来接丝滑进屋。 然后就我先洗澡，完事了老师邀请我上床一起盖着被子躺着，闲聊了几句，看到这么一个尤物在旁边，实在是有点等不及了，包着亲，吻，老师也很自然的给回应，女友感十足，然后带上雨伞结束了第一次。 随后就是一起看看电视聊聊天，一共做了2次，我和老师都累的不行，最后一次在老师女上疯狂的摇摆中共同飞升。 整体体验感很棒，老师可能没睡好，话不是很多，但是交流起来就有一种很亲近的感觉，而且也不催不事儿，搞的我怪不好意思的，最后走的时候老师还给我一个背后拥抱，下次找时间返食！
【验证留名】：药不能停 【验证老师】：婉儿 @waner65445 【验证时间】：8.1 【修车水费】：6p 【服务内容】：课表上的基本都有 【颜值身材】：8分 【体验细节】：按照约定好的时间直接上门，很久之前来过2、3次，感觉隔了这么久没什么变化，还是很漂亮的。进门先寒暄几句，然后交了水费就去洗白白，有妹妹帮洗还是美滋滋。之后上了床先是按摩了一哈，别说还是比较舒服，接着就是舌漫，然后尝试了哈69，可惜没能直接舔出水水，于是直接带套上马，以传教士姿势猛攻，不出几分钟下体便是一股热潮，妹妹直接喷水，然后接着继续猛攻，又是一阵热浪。奈何本人体力不支，没能发射，留着遗憾下次来战
【验 证 人】：曹艹 【日 期】：7月28 【老师昵称】：溪宁 @xining5201314 【地 区】：蜀山 【身材曲线】：9分 【年 龄】：22 【身 高】：168 【凶 器】：C 【肤 色】：美白 【服务内容】：口 做 洗澡 舌吻 【过程描述】：开门见到老师的脸，跟照片差不多，可爱型嫩妹，声音甜甜的， 一双笔直的大长腿，约课很顺利，进门后我先去洗澡了，接着进入闺房。先是亲吻，口，老师的口活真的很好，让我欲望喷张，迫不及待的戴上小雨伞，温暖又湿润的进入，老师好紧啊，我缓慢的进行着，老师也沉浸在和我的亲密接触当中，情到深处时老师的手紧紧的抓着我，后入时老师要我快一点，来了一波冲刺，疯狂输出，最后终于得到了释放。事后跟老师说了一会话，最后依依不舍分别。 优点：紧致，乖巧听话，炮感十足！不事不催！会二刷
【验 证 人】：菠萝 【日 期】：7月25日 【美女昵称】：初夏 @chuxia8898 【地 区】：蜀山 【修车水费】：7p 【身材曲线】：9分 【服务内容】：服务很全面 【年 龄】：22 【身 高】：168 【凶 器】：D，喜欢大奶的可以出击 【人照相似】：脸跟榜单照片 基本一致， 【服务内容】：口 做 洗澡 舌吻 【服务过程】：老师开门，看到老师的脸有被惊艳到，付完水费脱衣服冲洗。老师刚洗完也会帮忙清洗，洗完擦干上床，一个尤物在旁边，实在是有点等不及了，抱着就亲吻，口，🐍，做，口起来感觉相当可以，舌吻管够，会伸舌头，软软的，吃奶奶的时候手会抓紧手臂。做的时候姿势配合，老师会主动说话不会冷场，问老师什么都有回应，很有耐心态度很不错，服务时也很配合。整体体验很不错 优点：不事不催，态度好，配合度高
【验证留名】：大熊 【验证老师】：沐沐 【年 龄】：22 【频 道】：https://t.me/yaommmn 【验证时间】：7月26号 【修车水费】：6p 【见面感觉】：9分 【颜值身材】：9分 【凶 器】：C 【体验细节】：女友感十足，不事不催 上课过程：见到老师本人，发现和频道里的内容差别不大，说话甜甜的，然后我就先洗澡，洗好了老师邀请我上床，搂着老师纤细的身材，直接翻身开始亲吻，然后开始亲胸，口，老师的反馈很不错，一阵阵收缩，觉得差不多了，带上雨伞进入正题，前面，床边，情到深处，老师声音越来越大，后入时老师还提醒动作可以快一点，立马上头，疯狂输出，一泻千里，实在是太爽了，总之还是很推荐 整体体验感很棒，老师话不是很多，但是交流起来就有一种女友般的感觉，而且也不催不事儿，最后不舍得离开了 优点：十分推荐，相当满意，声音很上头，会二刷
【验 证 人】：洋洋 【日 期】：7月26 【老师昵称】：七穗 @qisui520888 【地 区】：蜀山 【身材曲线】：9分 【风情指数】：9 【年 龄】：22 【身 高】：167 【凶 器】：C 【肤 色】：美白 【人照相似】：真人好看过照片 【服务内容】：口 做 洗澡 舌吻 【过程描述】： 看到群里上了新人，丰满，可爱型嫩妹！果断出击，约课很顺利。打开门见到老师，比照片要好看，一双笔直的大长腿！老师有点点害羞，拉着我去洗澡，接着进入闺房。老师一直软软的跟我对话，先是亲亲，口，不得不说老师的口活真的很好，让我欲望喷张，于是戴上雨伞让老师躺下。温暖又湿润的进入，好紧啊，老师有点紧张，我缓慢的进行着，老师也沉浸在和我的亲密接触当中，情到深处老师腿也逐渐夹紧，手也紧紧的抓着我，最后终于得到了释放。老师睁开眼睛一脸柔情不让我抽离，跟着我一…
【验证留名】：江鱼儿 【验证老师】：婉儿 @waner65445 【验证时间】：7.21 【修车水费】：7p 【服务内容】：按摩，全身👅，口，菜单都有 【颜值身材】：8分 【体验细节】：身材高挑修长，资料没有水分，特别是腿型很好。主动陪洗，进房间以后先是按摩，手法不错，，总之课表上服务都有，正式开始。真的是一直喷，从头喷到尾，还会说骚话，大长腿视觉效果拉满，属于必打卡老师。很会聊天，不冷场
【验证留名】：杨德发 【验证老师】：恩琪 @enqi88888 【验证时间】：7.22 【修车水费】：11p 【服务内容】：挺多的 【颜值身材】：8.5分 【体验细节】：首先妹妹的科室不难找，可以停车。第一次见面，推开门捕获甜美妹子一枚，人照相符不踩雷。沙发休息闲聊还以为妹妹是广东妹子，很温柔贴心，交流过程很舒服。休息后进浴室开始拥抱亲亲水中萧，随后进房间缠绵，妹妹舌头灵活有力，口技了得。爱爱过程也是愉悦享受，具体还是不必细说。总而言之，对恩琪妹妹本人十分满意，并且肯定会再次与她见面，期待更深入交流。
【验证留名】：水晶湖 【验证老师】：恩琪 【验证时间】：7.18 【修车水费】：6p 【服务内容】：课表上都有 【颜值身材】：9分 【体验细节】：位置也挺好找的，下来接丝滑进屋。 然后就我先洗澡，完事了老师邀请我上床一起盖着被子躺着，闲聊了几句，看到这么一个尤物在旁边，实在是有点等不及了，包着亲，吻，老师也很自然的给回应，女友感十足，然后带上雨伞结束了第一次。 随后就是一起看看电视聊聊天，一共做了30分钟，我和老师都累的不行，老师女上疯狂的摇摆中共同飞升。 整体体验感很棒，老师可能没睡好，话不是很多，但是交流起来就有一种很亲近的感觉，而且也不催不事儿，搞的我怪不好意思的，最后走的时候老师还给我一个背后拥抱，下次找时间返食！
❤2
报告模板 https://t.me/HF8889998 【验证留名】： 【验证老师】： 【验证时间】： 【修车水费】： 【服务内容】： 【颜值身材】： 【体验细节】；
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @hefei899888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 307,092 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“酒池肉林报告榜” (@hefei899888), 1,125 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hefei899888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.