3 measurements spanning 2 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83–84 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 17:47
83
no change
8 Aug 2026, 12:35
83
-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:42
84
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 14 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
268
Videos
9
Links
44
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 53s
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
100 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5395847674018674683
39
39.0%
custom 5397807892797600564
36
36.0%
custom 5397581715524826120
17
17.0%
custom 5398104756642132346
8
8.00%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 18 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @heathercraft. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 April 2026 to 18 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
🔠🔠 🔠🔠
сегодня день особенный! и эстетика — уже традиционно — тоже особенная ⭐️
спасибо всем, что встречаете со мной мои четверть века :D
happy 25 to me 🧡
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
розовые пионы
белые босоножки
запах дорогого солнцезащитного крема
закат над морем
свет гирлянд после заката
#клубромантики
#водянаялилия
#ивент@heathercraft
😁🫠😍🥺😋😋
листья пальм
стакан воды со льдом
облака, которые быстро бегут по небу
кофе в бумажном стакане
лето после дождя
#иллюзияславы
#sevenheartsstories
#ивент@heathercraft
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
гроза без дождя
открытые окна в полночь
музыка из бара за углом
виски с вишней
неон, отражающийся в мокром асфальте
#никтоневеритнорме
#лигамечтателей
#ивент@heathercraft
✨🔠🔠🔠🔠✨
Всех с первым днём лета!
Июнь у меня будет посвящён как раз летним эстетикам: я потыкала (палочкой) чат gpt, и она выдала мне летние ассоциации на персонажей, из которых и сложатся эстетики 🧡
В комментариях вы можете предлагать своих персонажей, с кем хотели бы увидеть эстетику 🌸
#ивент@heathercraft
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🌿🌿🔤🔤🔤🔤
Я жива, постепенно выползаю из отдыха в рабочий ритм 🪴
Июнь думаю посвятить тоже серии эстетик: есть у меня одна идейка ☘️
Ждите 🍀
#щитпост@heathercraft
😈😈😈😈
Не могла, конечно, я пройти мимо и другой именинницы 🪭
Ведь сегодня годовщина ещё и у прекрасного спецвыпуска Паука «Ночной кошмар в Дзигоку», завораживающего атмосферой мрачной Японии, ёкаев, живущих бок о бок с людьми… и затягивающего в свои сети так, что не оторваться 👍
art by Iren Horrors
#ночнойкошмарвдзигоку
#лигамечтателей
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Поздравляю с годовщиной чудесную историю Мышиного короля 🤩
Не верится — столько времени мы уже погружены в атмосферу Нового Орлеана, тайн вуду, лоа и всего мистического, загадочного, зачаровывающего…
#никтоневеритнорме
#лигамечтателей
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @heathercraft. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“вересковые пустоши” (@heathercraft), 83 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/heathercraft.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.