Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 03:07 - За рамками добра и зла

Channel

03:07 - За рамками добра и зла

@healthbrain

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

279subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002142490914
TypeChannel
Username@healthbrain
Created13 March 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/healthbrain

Growth

272279275.57 August 2026 — 272 subscribers8 August 2026 — 272 subscribers16 August 2026 — 275 subscribers24 August 2026 — 279 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 271–280 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 18:57279+4
16 Aug 2026, 06:04275+3
8 Aug 2026, 08:48272no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:32272first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 13 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 17s
Average length
2m 39s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

307 reactions across 8 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥12841.7%
custom 50080406414777392658929.0%
3411.1%
👍206.51%
175.54%
❤‍🔥41.30%
🤔41.30%
😁30.977%
🤝30.977%
10.326%
🆒10.326%
👎10.326%
💩10.326%
💯10.326%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 307reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2024 to 6 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Apr 2025, 10:16 UTC≈4,640 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Эксперимент с приемом креатина. Часть 2️⃣ Кто еще не читал, жирный материал ждет тут: @healthbrain Длился ~2 недели. Прием по утрам Первые 5 дней: [креатина 10g + аргинина 1.6g + лизина 0.6g] Далее каждый день: [креатина 2.3г + аргинина 1.6g + лизина 0.6g] Бонус: В один из дней я разом поглотил 103г лукового сока(выжатых из 214г почищенного лука). Результат: 37 подтягиваний формата как на видео. Но с луком аккуратн

custom 500804064147773926521🔥74

Signed 03:08 Big Term

31 Mar 2025, 16:04 UTC≈3,790 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Эксперимент с приемом креатина. Часть1️⃣ Неидеально и не совсем широкий хват - просто фиксируем исходную точку 30 🤯 - и мы публикуем результаты после

custom 500804064147773926544🔥9

Signed 03:08 Big Term

9 Mar 2025, 18:34 UTC≈2,670 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

После долгого отсутствия всех приветствую Почти год интенсивной работы над материалом. Чтобы вы поняли, что дополнительные 5-10% к результату благодаря добавкам - это большое преимущество Я постарался написать самую содержательную статью про креатин, получилось ли - читайте. Полная версия материала по ссылке: https://teletype.in/@bhckerus/creatine Интересен эксперимент с микродозингом креатина - ставьте 🤯 Автор:

custom 500804064147773926524🔥10👍2

Signed 03:08 Big Term

25 Apr 2024, 07:16 UTC≈5,560 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Шалом! Жирный материал. Закроем сразу вопросы: - зачем нужны добавки - какие они бывают - на что обращать внимание при их приеме - ответы на самые частые вопросы о нутриентах Времени потрачено много. Потому я жду от вас фидбека в teletype(подписывайтесь туда, чтобы получать материалы первыми) или пишите в комментариях сюда Погнали: полная версия материала тут 🔙 Live-канал с живым материалом тут ⬅️

20🔥12👍5❤‍🔥31

Signed Big Term

28 Mar 2024, 18:29 UTC≈3,550 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Доброго времени суток, хищники. Первый материал раскрывает вопросы о том: - почему мы? - как важен фундамент - как задавать вопросы - цели проекта и ожидания от аудитории Судите строго, все же первый материал в новом проекте) Полетели: https://teletype.in/@bhckerus/fundamental

🔥2553🤔3👍1

25 Mar 2024, 07:17 UTC≈2,980 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥24👍953🤝3

17 Mar 2024, 18:45 UTC≈2,790 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥244😁32👍2👎1💩1

13 Mar 2024, 14:08 UTC≈2,750 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Приветствую, мужчины. Салют дамам. Если читаешь этот пост, значит, тебя заботит твое качество жизни, ты неравнодушен к своей судьбе. Ничего не продаем! Канал не про воздержание и не про пролактин.. Безусловно, практики относительно всех подобных тем будут, будет база, которую легко можно будет применить и не смей говорить, что ничего не работает. Возьми яйца в кулак и прежде попробуй. Созданная Мосом и Русланом ко

🔥1741❤‍🔥1👍1💯1🤔1🆒1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @healthbrain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“03:07 - За рамками добра и зла” (@healthbrain), 279 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/healthbrain.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.