Channel
@hchchchchchchj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
25subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003098324047 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hchchchchchchj |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hchchchchchchj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 25 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 26 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 27 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 27 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 7 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
54 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 29.6% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 13.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 11.1% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 11.1% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.85% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 1.85% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 1.85% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2025 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Чака похитили Чернобыльские чупакабри и у него случилось радиационное облучение очка и мозга,бога можете больше не ждать...✍️ Меня тоже,но меня и так нет, поэтому неважно (Он бузой вляеться р8дом с мно)
😍3🤔2❤1👏1🖕1
Ладно
Иду опустошу ближайший бар,в одиночестве не так весело развлекаться.
«Совесть — это голос, который говорит, что ты поступаешь неправильно. У моего голоса абонент недоступен» .… сказал я и разлил виски, запачкав новые штаны.Мда.
🤝2👏1🤔1
🌟 Od#🔤~@ж… F@ck,прiём… да k+0 во0бщ{е держит эту }штуку… Эо… 🔤то т§апок? Серьёзно{$]?🌟 Кхм.Так,ладно, хорошо... Дубль два...🎬 Сказал я,поправляя свои леопардовые стринги. Штаны...я не знаю где они... Но,вы просто знайте,что... Бог хаоса носит именно леопардовые стринги,и забудьте. Ладно, значит так,мои смертные...Я здесь✨ И да… 🔤… определённо трезвее, чем выгляжу. …или выгляжу трезвее, чем есть. Стеколный kак трехв…
🤝4❤2👏1🔥1
⭐🗡🗡✨✨✨✨🗡🗡⭐ ❤️(Появляется из тени в углу комнаты бункеры, поправляя манжету. На столе перед ним материализуется бутылка дорогого асамского мёда и два бокала)❤️ «О, смотрю, охотнички, вы снова пережили конец света!Как предсказуемо… и как скучно. 2025-й был годом, когда вы, как обычно, всё усложняли, вместо того чтобы принять элегантность хаоса. Но кто я такой, чтобы вас судить? (Ухмыляется). Пусть в 2026-м ваши враг…
❤3❤🔥2🔥2🎉1👏1🥰1
🗄️〰️➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖〰️🗄️ ××× [🥀Еᴦ᧐ яд᧐ʙᥙᴛыᥔ ʙᤋᴦ᧘яд δы᧘ уᥴᴛρᥱⲙ᧘ён ᥴᥱᥔчᥲᥴ ᧘ᥙɯь нᥲ жᥲ᧘κ᧐ ᥴᴦ᧐ρδᥙʙɯуюᥴя нᥲ ᴦρяᤋн᧐ⲙ ᥰ᧐᧘у ɸᥙᴦуρу, ᥴʙ᧐ᥙⲙ нᥙчᴛ᧐жᥱᥴᴛʙ᧐ⲙ δ᧐᧘ьɯᥱ нᥲᥰ᧐ⲙᥙнᥲʙɯую ᥙᤋδᥙᴛ᧐ᴦ᧐ щᥱнκᥲ ᥴ ᥰ᧐джᥲᴛыⲙ ᧐δρᥱᤋᥲнныⲙ ᥊ʙ᧐ᥴᴛ᧐ⲙ, нᥱжᥱ᧘ᥙ ʙ᧐ᥙнᥲ ᴦ᧐ᥴᥰ᧐дня. Б᧘юᤋ жᥱ ʙρᥱⲙя ʙᥴё ᴛᥲκ жᥱ ᥰρᥙᴦ᧘уɯённ᧐, δᥱᥴᥰ᧐κ᧐ᥔн᧐ ᥙᴦρᥲ᧘ ᴦдᥱ-ᴛ᧐ нᥲ ᤋᥲднᥱⲙ ɸ᧐нᥱ,ᥲ ᤋᥲᥰᥲ᥊ ᥴᥰᥙρᴛн᧐ᴦ᧐ ᥙ ᥰы᧘ᥙ ужᥱ дᥲʙн᧐ ᥴⲙᥱɯᥲ᧘ᥴя ᥴ ⲙᥱᴛᥲ᧘᧘ᥙчᥱᥴκᥙⲙ ᧐ᴛᴛᥱнκ᧐ⲙ 𐋏ᥱκ᧐ᴦдᥲ ᴦ᧘ᥲɯᥲᴛᥲᥔ,…
❤2❤🔥1👏1🔥1🥰1
И κ᧐ᴦдᥲ 𐌡᧐κᥙ ᤋᥲκ᧐нчᥙ᧘,ᥱᴦ᧐ ᧘ᥲд᧐нь κρᥱᥰκ᧐ ᥴжᥙⲙᥲющᥲя д᧐ ϶ᴛ᧐ᴦ᧐ ᴦ᧐ρ᧘янκу 𐌲ᥲʙρᥙᥙ᧘ᥲ,ⲙᥱд᧘ᥱнн᧐ ᥴᥰ᧐᧘ᤋ᧘ᥲ,н᧐ нᥱ д᧘я ᴛ᧐ᴦ᧐, чᴛ᧐δы ᧐ᴛᥰуᥴᴛᥙᴛь, ᥲ чᴛ᧐δы ᴦρуδ᧐, ᥰ᧐чᴛᥙ ᥰ᧐-᥊᧐ᤋяᥔᥴκᥙ, ᥰρ᧐ʙᥱᥴᴛᥙ ᥰᥲ᧘ьцᥲⲙᥙ ᥰ᧐ ᧘ᥙнᥙᥙ ᥱᴦ᧐ чᥱ᧘юᥴᴛᥙ, ᥴᴛᥙρᥲя κᥲᥰ᧘ᥙ κρ᧐ʙᥙ. – 𐌲ᥲδρᥙ϶᧘ь... 𐌺ᥲκ ᴛы дуⲙᥲᥱɯь, ᥰ᧐чᥱⲙу я ᥰ᧐ⲙ᧐ᴦ ᴛᥱδᥱ ᴛ᧐ᴦдᥲ? 𐌺᧐ᴦдᥲ ᴛы ᴛ᧐᧘ьκ᧐ ᥰρᥙɯё᧘ κ᧐ ⲙнᥱ... 𐌺᧐ᴦдᥲ ᴛы, чёρᴛ ʙ᧐ᤋьⲙᥙ, ᧐ᥰяᴛь уδᥱᴦᥲ᧘ ᧐ᴛ ᥰρ᧐δ᧘ᥱⲙы? 𐌑? 𐌺ᥲᤋᥲ᧘᧐ᥴь, ʙ ϶ᴛ᧐ᴛ ⲙ᧐ⲙᥱнᴛ ᥱᴦ᧐ ᴦ᧘ᥲᤋᥲ ᴦ᧐ρᥱ᧘ᥙ ᥰ᧐-нᥲᥴᴛ᧐ящᥱⲙу.…
❤3❤🔥1👏1💩1🔥1🥰1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
"Маленькая шалость бога" [Легкая, почти невесомая походка,словно тот и вовсе плыл, острый взгляд скользил по разрушенным крышам украдкой,по густому,молочному мраку,что витал здес,и в котором копошились тени. Тени сотканы из множество страхов,твоего сознания,а так же илюзиии. Его острые уголки губ подрагивают в намеке на улыбку. Сайлент Хилл,признаться впечатлял.Не каждый день встречаешь место, которое так настойчив…
❤3❤🔥2👏1🔥1😁1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @hchchchchchchj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 294,814 of 1,629,518 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@hchchchchchchj named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚕️ℋσɕʋʂ ⅌σƙʋʂ⚕️” (@hchchchchchchj), 25 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hchchchchchchj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.