💻 Пять комбинаций для ноутбука, которые сэкономят вам время
custom 53056094490570345796custom 53010203194509311892

Channel
@havk_tuah
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
292subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001700460360 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @havk_tuah |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/havk_tuah |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 292 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 291 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 290 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:10 | 290 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
102 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5301020319450931189 | 40 | 39.2% | |
| custom 5244512542839051833 | 20 | 19.6% | |
| custom 5305609449057034579 | 18 | 17.6% | |
| custom 5318842342080258949 | 8 | 7.84% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 4.90% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 3.92% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 2.94% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 2.94% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.98% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 30 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💻 Пять комбинаций для ноутбука, которые сэкономят вам время
custom 53056094490570345796custom 53010203194509311892
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52445125428390518337custom 53010203194509311892
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52445125428390518333❤2
🎊Сегодня исполняется 47 лет Хидэаки Сорачи, создателю «Гинтамы», и «Одуванчика»!
custom 53010203194509311892
Ну и нахуй я туда полез: От нечего делать решил накатить jailbreak на плеер, наверное подумаете, делов хуйня и че тут за жижу захотел затравить? Самая первая ёбка: мертвейшие драйвера к древним версиям тунца. Эту залупу, какой-то хуйней пофиксил, ещё приложение реальный пиздец. 3utools нахуй только посылал, а тунец без стороннего вообще нихуя не видел устройство. Благо нашлось решение в виде Aquila, ибо через p0si…
❤1custom 53010203194509311891
Мне идти на последний звонок?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 53010203194509311893
У меня завтра будет последний звонок
custom 53010203194509311895
Video, posted without a caption
😭5custom 53188423420802589494custom 53010203194509311893
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53056094490570345795💩3👎1💯1custom 53010203194509311891
Для потужно-пераможных
custom 52445125428390518332custom 53010203194509311891custom 53188423420802589491
Я не сталкивался с подобной ситуацией. У меня никогда не было ощущения, что я состою в отношениях. Мне это чуждо. Да и, к тому же, я пока не скоро буду состоять в отношениях. Девушкам я не нравлюсь, но мне, наоборот, нравятся многие девушки. И на самом деле, мне всегда было интересно: каково это — кого-то любить? Я даже не уверен, был ли я влюблён в свою бывшую. Недавно я познакомился с одним парнем, которому нравила…
custom 53010203194509311891
306_В_ОЖИДАНИИ_ОТВЕТА_ (в связи с последними событиями) @buhanochka_Z
custom 53010203194509311896custom 52445125428390518331custom 53056094490570345791
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @havk_tuah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Мне идти на последний звонок?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 30 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,174,421 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“хавк туах” (@havk_tuah), 292 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/havk_tuah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.