Меня вымораживает мнение, что вокалоид лучше утау. Люди, которые так считают либо слышали утау только в 2008 году, когда существовали только всратые CV войсбанки, либо мыслят так: "ну вакалоид платны, а утау бесплатны значит вакалоид пизже ыыы". Некоторые VCV утау звучат намного лучше и реалистичнее, чем все войсбанки для вокалоида. А если ещё взять опенутау, которым сейчас все в основном и пользуются, то в нём ещё и…

Channel
Hate vocaloid confession |¦ 💢🎤
@hatevocacf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
215subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003110710309 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hatevocacf |
| Description | 1 vivipotz в пинт 2 peigu1045 в тамблере Бот для тейков: @Hatevocal_bot Брак с @sukoneteiconfession |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hatevocacf |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 215 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 215 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 36.0%
- avg views ÷ 215 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 77.5
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 6.59%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (2 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,395 |
| Reactions total | 55 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 263
- Videos
- 14
- Links
- 128
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
55 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 20 | 36.4% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 18.2% | |
| 🍓 | 7 | 12.7% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 10.9% | |
| 👻 | 5 | 9.09% | |
| 🤷♂ | 3 | 5.45% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 3.64% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⏝︶ 𖥔˙ . 𝓦 𝑒𝑙𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑡𝑜 . . . ꒰😺😺꒱ tetorei. | ㅤㅤ ˗ˏˋ 𝘾𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 & d𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑦 ˎˊ˗ ׄ𓏸⃘ ֺ ִ именно в этом конфешене и дэйли будет публиковаться арты с теторей, ты можешь поделиться своим рисунком, фанфиком, т.д здесь, мы будем публиковать тоже самое чтобы найти таких же фанатов по теторей. @tetorei_teikibot / @tetorei_conf / РТ ЭТОТ ПОСТ!
💘2
▙▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▜ 📀— ненавидишь этого переоценённого вокалоида с уебищным голосом и уродским дизайном???? Тогда... ДОБРО ПОЖАЛОВАТЬ В... HATE FUCKING OHIOLOID CF ⚠️бот⚠️буст⚠️вп пост⚠️ ▙▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▚▜
👻3❤🔥1🤷♂1
не понимаю прикола с хейтам ченнела кастейшн, чел и так из за глупцов, чт его обвиняли, из соцсете надолга ушол, а как тока вернулся, то все заорали : «поч юкопи выбрал именна ченнела для мв ??, репутацию себе решил затоптать ??» , ну вот дела в том, что яп вокафд всем на его поступке пофиг. . хатя, какие ещо поступки ?!, − типа он «лоликон» эта такая херь, на самом деле. ну рял, прям пруфов этому нет, лишь приводят…
❤🔥3
🥹ЧУДОВИЩА СЕКАЙ ФД 🐟 – Меня раздражает одно позорище из секай фд которое творит всякую ересь🥕 – КАК ЖЕ МЕНЯ ЗАЕБАЛА ЭТА ШТУКА КОТОРАЯ ПИШЕТ ХЕРНЮ ВО ВСЕХ ЧАТАХ ПО СЕКАЮ! 🍊 – Я ненавижу фанов **** ..... 🐟 Хочешь обсудить поступки какой-то личности из секай фд? 🐟🐟 🐟🐟Тогда тебе сюда! Здесь ты можешь обсудить кого угодно из секай фд абсолютно анонимно🐟 Мы не несём ответственность за тейки!🐟 Вп пост 🐟 Буст 🐟 Бот
те кто называют калне ка мику будут распяты, их внутренности будут размолоты в кашу и их родственникам пришлют по почте их глаза ıllı #тейк |¦ @Hatevocal_bot
❤🔥3🆒1
Привет, я блять просто ненавижу тех самых "умных" фанатов тето и (не) ларперов, которые говорят самые очевидные вещи типа "я фанат тето и да, я знаю что она уталоид, а не вокалоид ",ну нихуя себе, я не знала прикинь. "Я фанат тето и да, я не завышаю тето до небес и уважаю других лоидов" (чувак всем похуй на тебя), так их еще и хвалят в коммах мол "ура, наконец то умный фанат тето", 😭😭 ıllı #тейк |¦ @Hatevocal_bot
🤔4🍓3❤🔥1🤝1
те кто называют мою прекрасную замечательную превосходную Тоне Рион "Тон Рион" будут расчленены и их кишки будут использованы мной вместо туалетной бумаги ıllı #тейк |¦ @Hatevocal_bot
🍓1🆒1
Йохиолоид ебаный вонючий спермобак ıllı #тейк |¦ @Hatevocal_bot
👀1👻1💘1
Привет это очень серьёзно если вам абсолютно похуй то вы не человек вы безэмоциональный инопланетянин. То что все как-то забывают про то что ошеломительный успех песни няняняняняня которая играет на фоне культового нян кэта существовал благодаря пению момо а не мику. Версия с мику ориг насколько я знаю, НО это такая ебень!! Момо гораздо круче во всех аспектах, и чувак который делал кавер поработал хорошо, так почему…
❤🔥5🤔4
к*йтоляпис поебень к*йтоляпис хуетень все кто это любят должны использоваться в качестве подопытных во всяких негуманных экспериментах ıllı #тейк |¦ @Hatevocal_bot
❤🔥3🤷♂2👻1
💌 Тебе отправили новое сообщение: Ты мне давно нравишься, хочу быть с тобой)
🍓3💘3🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hatevocacf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hate vocaloid confession |¦ 💢🎤” (@hatevocacf), 215 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hatevocacf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.