Video, posted without a caption
🌭1💘1

Channel
@hatepizzapunch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
43subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003073123987 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hatepizzapunch |
| Description | Бу блять |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hatepizzapunch |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 43 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
37 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 8 | 21.6% | |
| 🤮 | 8 | 21.6% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 18.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 8.11% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 8.11% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 5.41% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 5.41% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 5.41% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 2.70% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 2.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 10 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
🌭1💘1
🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🥹🥹🌟 𝔀𝓪𝓲𝓽... 𝓦𝓱𝓪𝓽⁉️ 🌟🌟 🥹🥹𝓔𝓾𝓷𝓸𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓲𝓵𝔂𝓬𝓯 🥹🥹 🤩❄️🤩𝓘 𝓵𝓸𝓸𝓸𝓸𝓿𝓮 𝓮𝓾𝓷𝓸𝓲𝓪...🎀⭐ 🥹𝓙𝓞𝓘𝓝!🥹🌟🌟
. . . 𖥔 ₊ 🌟 𝖱𝖳 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 🌟 𝖶𝖾𝗅𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝗍𝗈 𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗓𝗒 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝖽𝖾, 𝗐𝗂𝗇𝗀𝖾𝖽 𝗁𝖺𝖼𝗄𝖾𝗋𝗌) !!🌟!!⟪🤨⟫ — > ⲏⲓ!! ⲙы ⲧⲩⲧ ⲥⲃⲟύ ⳝⲗⲟⲅ ⲥ ⲥⲉⲙⲉⲣⲕⲟύ ⲟⲧⲕⲣыⲗυ.... ⲏⲉ ⲭⲟⲧυⲧⲉ ⲗυ ⲅⲗяⲏⲩⲧь? я ⲏⲁⲥⲧⲁυⲃⲁю. ⲥⲉύⳡⲁⲥ ⲃⲁⲙ эⲧⲟⲧ ⳅⲗⲟⲇⲉύ ⲭⲁⲕⲉⲣ ⲣⲁⲥⲥⲕⲁⲯⲉⲧ ⳡⲟ ⲃⲁⲥ ⲧⲩⲧⲁ ⲯⲇⲉⲧ! 🌟🎀⟪👹⟫ —ⲇⲟⳝⲣыύ ⲇⲉⲏь ⲃⲁⲙ! ⲃⲟ ⲡⲉⲣⲃыⲭ я ⲏⲉ ⳅⲗⲟⲇⲉύ) ⲏⲉ ⲥⲧⲟυⲧ ⲥⲧⲁⲃυⲧь ⲧⲁⲕυⲉ ⲫⲁⲗьⲱυⲃыⲉ ⲱⲧⲁⲙⲡы ⲟⳝⲟ ⲙⲏⲉ, ⲙυⲥⲧⲉⲣ ⲇⲿⲟⲏ ⲱⲉⲇⲗⲉⲧⲥⲕυύ) ⲏⲟ ⲇⲁ я ⲭⲟⳡⲩ ⲟⲡⲟⲃⲉⲥⲧυⲧь ⲃⲁ…
👎2
🌟🌟 🤍elcome to. . . 🌟 🤍ay Madness 2012 cf + daily 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 Давно ищешь контент по майскому безумию??! 🌟 хочешь найти сокосплеера или друзей??? Не можешь найти ?? 🌟 хочешь поделиться своим творчеством по этому фандому?? 🌟 🦌 : Тебе определенно к нам !! 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🤩вп пост 🥹навигация 🥹 бот cr : knive0412 twt
❤1
🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩 я так хочу найти человека с которым можно поиграть в этот плейс >_< 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 а мне хочется рассказать о своих достижениях . . 🥹🥹 welcome to ...🍭 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🎀🅰️🅰️🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🦷🥹☺️ут ты найдёшь себе человека, чтобы поиграть, можешь поделиться артами . . да и вообще всем по различным плейсам роблокса 🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🔡🔡 -ˏ͛⑅ ‧̥̥͙‧̥̥ ̥ ̮ ̥ ⊹ ‧̫‧ ⊹ ̥ ̮ ̥ ‧̥̥‧̥̥͙ ⑅ˏ͛--ˏ͛⑅ ‧̥̥͙‧̥̥ ̥ ̮ ̥ ⊹ ‧̫‧ ⊹ ̥
. ⌗🗡️. ᶻ 𐰁🚨⊹ ꔛ🍷! ! . — 𝗞𝗔𝗞 Ж𝗘 Я 𝗛𝗘𝗛𝗔𝗕ИЖ𝗬 𝗔Д𝗠И𝗛𝗕И𝗣𝗬𝗖𝗢𝗕, 𝗫𝗬Й𝗛Я, 𝗔 𝗛𝗘 П𝗘Й𝗣И𝗛Г‼️ ﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋ Ф𝗔𝗛𝗔𝗧Ы Э𝗧𝗢Г𝗢 П𝗘Й𝗣И𝗛Г𝗔 𝗧𝗔𝗞И𝗘 𝗘𝟲𝗔𝗛𝗔𝗧Ы.. — ﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋ — 𝗫𝗢Ч𝗬 𝗕Ы𝗖𝗞𝗔𝟯𝗔𝗧Ь 𝗖𝗕𝗢𝗘 𝗠𝗛𝗘𝗛И𝗘 𝗢𝟲 Э𝗧𝗢𝗠 П𝗘Й𝗣И𝗛Г𝗘❗️ ﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋ 💢ꔛ𝙏𝙤ж𝙚 иᴄпыᴛыʙᴀᴇᴛᴇ ʜᴇʜᴀʙиᴄᴛь ᴋ эᴛᴏᴍʏ. ʏ𝟲ᴏжᴇᴄᴛʙʏ⁉️ ⥤ᴛᴏгдᴀ ʙᴀᴍ ᴋ ʜᴀᴍ❗️ ДO6ᑭO ПOЖᗩЛOᗷᗩTЬ ᗷ ↓ ↓ ↓ ⧽𝐀𝐃𝐌𝟏𝐍 𝐕𝟏𝐑𝐔𝐒 𝐇𝟒𝐓𝟑 𝐂𝐅 ❌ ⇶𝗧𝘆𝗧 𝗕ы 𝗰𝗺𝗼ж𝗲𝗧𝗲 𝗕ы𝗰𝗸𝗮𝟯𝗮𝗧ь 𝗕𝗰𝗲 𝗰𝗕𝗼и…
❤3
[БЫЛ РЕЙД ПРОВЕРЬТЕ ПОДПИСКУ!!] 🤩🇭 🇪 🇱 🇱 🇴 🇬 🇺 🇾 🇸🩸 ➿🌟➿🌟➿🌟➿🌟➿🌟 🌟— Блин мне так нравится пейринг "Джэйсон/Слэшер × Нуб", но не могу найти по нему кф:< 🌟 — А я арт к этому шипу/ нарисовал(а) / написал(а) хедканон, но кому мне это показывать?😕 🌟 — А я егор😎 Хочешь найти канал с таким шипом?? ТОГДА ВАМ К НАМ! 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩.. 🏷🏷🏷🏷🏷🏷🏷🏷🏷 🏷🏷🏷🏷🏷🏷🏷🏷🏷🏷🏷️️ 🌟🌟 🌟🌟 Здесь вы может…
👎2
НАС СНЕСЛИ, ПРОВЕРЬТЕ ПОДПИСКУ 🤩😻😻😻🌟😻😻😻 ➖🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩😻😻😻🤩 Конфешен по такому шиппу как Мафиозо/Нуб. Заходите и получите нужную для вас порцию контента 😻😻🤩🤩🤩😻😻🤩 Наше эмодзикомбо → 🥤🐇 🌟➿➿➿➿➿➿🤩 Прекрасная навигация!
👎2
ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ୧ 𝑊𝘦𝘭𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 to . . . @ 1x666 CONFESSION ‹ ᅠᅠ ࣪𖤐 𝐇равятся 1х666❔... ᅠᅠ➥ Хотелось бы п𝓸смотреть или отправить контент по ним❔ ᧔ꫂ᭪݁᧓. ᅠᅠᅠᅠ... 𝑗𝑜𝑖𝑛 𝑢𝑠 ᰔᩚ ᅠ #. 𝑛𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ᅠ#. 𝑚𝑝 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡 cr mzmayh3m on discord
👎2
тв/кв нсфв что это боять, на какую птццу это пойдет🌈 я просто хотел глянуть в любимый кф, а тут это #Адмтейк | @PizzapunchHate_bot
🤮8
₩₱ ₱ø₴₮ [НАБОР В АДМ] ➷ ➹ ➷ ➹ ➷ ➹ ➷ ➹ ➷ ➹ ➷ ➹ ➷ ➹ ??? - Ł'₥ ⱠØVɆ ₱₳ɏ₵ⱨɇ₵₭!!! ₳₦ᕲ ₱ᴀʏ𝘴𝘩𝘦ᴋ 𝖈𝖋 – 𝚒𝚝 𝚠𝙖𝚜 𝙘𝙧𝘦𝘢𝙩𝘦𝙙 - ᖴ𝘰𝘳 𝕥ᕼ𝔦𝚜 𝔭𝔲𝚜𝕠𝚜𝕖! · 𝙰𝚕𝚕* - 𝙋𝘼𝙔𝘾𝙃𝙀𝘾𝙆 𝘾𝙁!!! ➹ ➷ ➹ ➷ ➹ ➷ ➹ ➷ ➹ ➷ ➹ ➷ ➹ ➷ ₳ɽ₮ Đɽ₳₩ł₦₲: @tartaltiuuu
👍2
🤍🤍🤍🤍🅰️🅰️❎🤍🤍🤍🤍 "Я в трихуи с неадекватных малолеток в рб."🤩 "Да угомонись обсирать без ясной причины,ты уже и так показал(-а)свои 47 хромосом.Дай поиграть спокойно😔" 🤩Нашёл(-а) неадекватное быдло на сервере,когда просто хотел(-а) спокойно поиграть,но не с кем об этом поделиться?Тогда те сто пудов сюда ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🐳Навигацыя 🐳ВП пост ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ *Всё,на этом вступительный пост окончен лол
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hatepizzapunch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,055,159 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@hatepizzapunch named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HATE PIZZAPUNCH CONFESSION” (@hatepizzapunch), 43 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hatepizzapunch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.