Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗺𝘆жл𝗼𝗲б𝗸и 𝗰𝗳

Channel

𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗺𝘆жл𝗼𝗲б𝗸и 𝗰𝗳

@hatemuzhloyobki

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

99subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003814881229
TypeChannel
Username@hatemuzhloyobki
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 28 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/hatemuzhloyobki

Growth

9912 Aug 2026, 05:16 — 99 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 05:30 — 99 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 05:1612 Aug 2026, 05:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 98–100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:3099no change
12 Aug 2026, 05:1699first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 28 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
17
Videos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
22s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

149 reactions across 10 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮4630.9%
💘2617.4%
🕊1912.8%
1610.7%
💔128.05%
👎74.70%
🤯64.03%
❤‍🔥42.68%
🍓42.68%
😭32.01%
👀21.34%
💋21.34%
🖕10.671%
🤨10.671%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 11 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 May 2026, 17:15 UTC173 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я рыгаю в подушку, мой мир больше не Сталин Брежнев. СУКА КАК ЖИТЬ ТО... Я — писатель. Пишу книгу около-фантастику. Парней достаточно во всех планируемых 3-х томах, но девушек побольше. Моя подруга обсасывает мужских персонажей, даже не узнав хоть немного о них... СУКА У МЕНЯ ТАМ 1 БЫВШИЙ НАРКОМАН, А 2 ПРОСТИТУТ, НУ КАК?! Даже я сама порой, как автор, не очень люблю своих персонажей, но на то они и субъекты, чтобы не

8🍓2💘2

6 May 2026, 05:01 UTC221 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

КАК ЖЕ МНЕ НЕ ХВАТАЛО КФ С ТАКОЙ ТЕМАТИКОЙ. Боже вы бы знали насколько сильно меня заебали мужлоебки в фд геншина. Как же они заебали обсасывать вообще всех персов мужского пола. Тот же Лоэн откровенно говоря урод. У него максимально уебищный дизайн, но все ему сосут ведь он мэн🤪🤪 Еще меня заебало что они 24/7 рыдают что мужиков в геншине мало. Конечно их очевидно меньше чем тех же женщин, но уж точно не мало, камон

💘93👀2🖕1

5 May 2026, 14:14 UTC207 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

"。пиздец блять как вы заебали с этим билли он во второй половине будет подождите пару недель ещё сука" цитирую слова друга @hatemuzhloyobki | #take bot — @hatemuzhloyobkibot

🕊63🍓1

27 Apr 2026, 10:00 UTC207 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

хейт лесби кф не удивляет @hatemuzhloyobki | #take bot — @hatemuzhloyobkibot

💔12

14 Apr 2026, 13:03 UTC263 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

какой же это все таки пиздец 🥹 @hatemuzhloyobki | #take bot — @hatemuzhloyobkibot

🤮11

7 Apr 2026, 20:44 UTC291 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

это пиздец 🥹 @hatemuzhloyobki | #take bot — @hatemuzhloyobkibot

🤮21

1 Apr 2026, 06:42 UTC298 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Да да, мы поняли, что вам Билли нравится... Завалите уже пиздаки и не обсирайте других персонажей, долбоебы. @hatemuzhloyobki | #take bot — @hatemuzhloyobkibot

👎7❤‍🔥4🕊41

28 Mar 2026, 22:56 UTC338 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

это пиздец @hatemuzhloyobki | #take bot — @hatemuzhloyobkibot

🤮14🤯6😭31🤨1

28 Mar 2026, 20:15 UTC315 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ну и конечно у неё все авы в мужских персонажах, среди которых Секайный Кайто @hatemuzhloyobki | #take bot — @hatemuzhloyobkibot

🕊9🍓1

28 Mar 2026, 15:15 UTC278 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Пов как себя чувствует мужлоёбка в фанбазе вокасинтов (которая шарит только за основную шестёрку), когда засрала Луку и Мейко за "сєксуализираваный" и "скушний" дизайн, а потом пошла дрочить на Кайто @hatemuzhloyobki | #take bot — @hatemuzhloyobkibot

💘15💋2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @hatemuzhloyobki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,397,931 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗺𝘆жл𝗼𝗲б𝗸и 𝗰𝗳” (@hatemuzhloyobki), 99 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hatemuzhloyobki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.