Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

HATB369INU - HagridAndrewTateBatman369INU | $SOL

@hatbxi_eth

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

23subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001610846136
TypeChannel
Username@hatbxi_eth
Created18 August 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/hatbxi_eth

Growth

2310 Aug 2026, 14:16 — 23 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 12:31 — 23 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 14:1611 Aug 2026, 12:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22–24 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 12:3123no change
10 Aug 2026, 14:1623first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 18 August 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

75 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2128.0%
❤‍🔥1925.3%
👍810.7%
👏810.7%
🕊810.7%
🔥68.00%
🐳34.00%
22.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2023 to 18 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Nov 2023, 18:56 UTC280 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @whitetygercalls

Be ready we going to the moon! T.me/bongocat_eth

16 Sept 2023, 16:58 UTC376 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @whitetygercalls

Join my launch next week @mysteryboteth

👍2

13 Sept 2023, 21:42 UTC395 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @whitetygercalls

Launching in 30 mins t.me/this_is_dope

11 Sept 2023, 14:41 UTC371 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Feelings

  1. ._.5%
  2. Market rugging23%
  3. Sell btc rebuy in 15k12%
  4. Bullrun in 2024 if trump push it dca 😁17%
  5. What Elon is cooking with X and crypto can change the game7%
  6. Its a fake dump19%
  7. Btc 9k bullrun only in winter 20257%
  8. USA dumping, depends on sec sues, etf etc to start a bull run, more fud will come9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Sept 2023, 15:01 UTC263 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @whitetygercalls

👀 REACT THIS POST WITH EMOJIS IF YOU WANT A DUCKRACE GIVEAWAY LIVE ON VC RIGHT NOW❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ 💲💲💲💲💲💲💲💲 😐🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 💲💲💲💸💸💸💸💸 🫥💃😁😊😦💃😮😳🤬🍿🍿😐🤔🤔🤔🍒

1

9 Sept 2023, 13:57 UTC166 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @CryptachGamblesPhoto

Stealth Launch 📶 Network - ETH 🕓 Launch TBA 👨‍🔧 Dev/Owner: Mateos Rocco ↩️ Last project: Carlos Community | Chart 👉 t.me/mysteryboteth ——— ⚡️ Calls | 🎲 Gambles | 🎃 Emoji

9 Sept 2023, 13:57 UTC121 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @CryptachGamblesPhoto

Stealth Launch 📶 Network - ETH 🕓 Launch TBA 👨‍🔧 Dev/Owner: Mateos Rocco ↩️ Last project: Carlos Community | Chart 👉 t.me/mysteryboteth ——— ⚡️ Calls | 🎲 Gambles | 🎃 Emoji

3 Sept 2023, 14:09 UTCviews —

HATB369INU - HagridAndrewTateBatman369INU | $SOL pinned «Launch next week https://t.me/mysteryboteth»

3 Sept 2023, 13:36 UTC269 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @whitetygercalls

Launch next week https://t.me/mysteryboteth

20 Aug 2023, 07:12 UTC≈1,930 views18 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

12🔥32👍1

19 Aug 2023, 03:03 UTCviews —

HATB369INU - HagridAndrewTateBatman369INU | $SOL pinned «https://t.me/+FuvsXUS1EpIzMTdh»

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @hatbxi_eth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Sept 2023, 14:41 UTCAnonymous Poll107 voters

Feelings

  1. ._.5%
  2. Market rugging23%
  3. Sell btc rebuy in 15k12%
  4. Bullrun in 2024 if trump push it dca 😁17%
  5. What Elon is cooking with X and crypto can change the game7%
  6. Its a fake dump19%
  7. Btc 9k bullrun only in winter 20257%
  8. USA dumping, depends on sec sues, etf etc to start a bull run, more fud will come9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2023 to 18 November 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,048,265 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HATB369INU - HagridAndrewTateBatman369INU | $SOL” (@hatbxi_eth), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hatbxi_eth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.