Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Haskil

Channel

Haskil

@haskil_music

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

167subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001386025916
TypeChannel
Username@haskil_music
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/haskil_music

Growth

152167159.57 August 2026 — 152 subscribers8 August 2026 — 152 subscribers23 August 2026 — 165 subscribers31 August 2026 — 167 subscribers7 August 202631 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 23 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 150–169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 00:25167+2
23 Aug 2026, 00:19165+13
8 Aug 2026, 19:17152no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:00152first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 07s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

109 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4238.5%
🔥3431.2%
👍3128.4%
custom 521746699633716534821.83%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC382 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

В 2k16 мы с друзьями собрали трио. Написали всего две композиции и даже несколько раз с ними выступили. Более того, за такой короткий срок существования проекта мы успели отхватить респект от Matisse & Sadko 🎼

🔥84custom 52174669963371653482

8 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC215 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Таким был VK Fest в Питербургере

5🔥5👍2

22 Jun 2026, 11:04 UTC248 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В составе проекта S-VOX отвечал за подключение и звук на Ural Music Night

7👍6🔥3

16 Jun 2026, 11:12 UTC221 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

дали с ребятами сольный концерт

12👍10🔥8

8 Jun 2026, 12:03 UTC384 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Споры о том, что «тру», а что нет, это проявление гиковского юношеского максимализма в эпоху AI. Тема сама по себе кажется абсурдной: сегодня делить музыку на «настоящую» и «фальшивую» - чистой воды донкихотство. Нейросети окончательно добили правила игры, которые работали раньше. Но именно уверенность в «тру»-подходе приводит к появлению контркультуры как противовеса бесконечному потоку «идеального» творчества за ав

6👍6🔥3

5 Jun 2026, 10:00 UTC229 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Раздали с TRU 47 и KURT92 🦈

8👍7🔥7

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @haskil_music. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Haskil” (@haskil_music), 167 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/haskil_music.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.