Channel
@hash1ii1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
228subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003113841830 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hash1ii1 |
| Description | рисую, но конечно же это только в гта 5 рп! 27.09.2025 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hash1ii1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 228 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 228 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (4 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,448 |
| Reactions total | 552 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
834 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5287717573079618139 | 233 | 27.9% | |
| custom 5213396711665322724 | 195 | 23.4% | |
| 💘 | 132 | 15.8% | |
| custom 5210807812753477709 | 82 | 9.83% | |
| custom 5235824811841692131 | 65 | 7.79% | |
| custom 5429598038131774062 | 65 | 7.79% | |
| custom 5213448904107904248 | 29 | 3.48% | |
| custom 5303040337059543238 | 18 | 2.16% | |
| 👾 | 14 | 1.68% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.12% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 834reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hash1ii1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
там не так поется рикош, спасибо за звёзды!! ❤️
custom 528771757307961813949custom 521344890410790424816custom 521339671166532272413custom 54295980381317740625
Signed ㅤㅤㅤ ` ℋ𝒂𝒔𝒉𝒊
ашалеть вы бешеные оказывается, спасибо большое за репосты и реакции всем, очень мотивируете меня блин!! факк я заметила еще посты про себя в штуках как "в фд любят" ток сейчас ибо обычно не контачу внутри фд, но тем не менее, где заметила - я ответила, хоть и поздно, nvm 🌟 В общем спасибо большое за такой актив итд, л#блю вас 💯 (фуу чтоза слова гадкие летчт с моего рта)
custom 528771757307961813928💘6custom 52133967116653227245custom 52358248118416921311custom 54295980381317740621
Signed ㅤㅤㅤ ` ℋ𝒂𝒔𝒉𝒊
сука опять эти спасибо кукишш за звезды!! пр гаедо тебе тоже аригато
💘45custom 530304033705954323815custom 521339671166532272412custom 52108078127534777094custom 52877175730796181393custom 54295980381317740622
Signed ㅤㅤㅤ ` ℋ𝒂𝒔𝒉𝒊
Photo, posted without a caption
💘26custom 542959803813177406216custom 521339671166532272410custom 52358248118416921313custom 52877175730796181392custom 52108078127534777091
Signed ㅤㅤㅤ ` ℋ𝒂𝒔𝒉𝒊
элвинсери deti 🌳нет я не одичала
💘32👾14custom 521339671166532272412custom 52877175730796181393custom 52108078127534777092custom 52358248118416921311custom 53030403370595432381
Signed ㅤㅤㅤ ` ℋ𝒂𝒔𝒉𝒊
и чби прдрк
custom 521339671166532272439custom 521080781275347770915custom 521344890410790424811custom 52877175730796181392
Signed ㅤㅤㅤ ` ℋ𝒂𝒔𝒉𝒊
снчз
custom 528771757307961813932custom 521339671166532272413custom 523582481184169213113
Signed ㅤㅤㅤ ` ℋ𝒂𝒔𝒉𝒊
скоро чета нормальное!! (наверное, не точно, возможно, надеюсь)
custom 528771757307961813931custom 521339671166532272413custom 542959803813177406210custom 52358248118416921312
Signed ㅤㅤㅤ ` ℋ𝒂𝒔𝒉𝒊
нихренаспбе вас дохрена
custom 528771757307961813924custom 523582481184169213110custom 54295980381317740629
Signed ㅤㅤㅤ ` ℋ𝒂𝒔𝒉𝒊
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 521339671166532272430custom 521080781275347770915custom 542959803813177406212💘4
Signed ㅤㅤㅤ ` ℋ𝒂𝒔𝒉𝒊
мне надоел моц прошлый стиль поэтому буду ебашить как чувствую 🥺 (4 дня подряд на улице сказались на мне)
custom 528771757307961813926custom 521339671166532272410custom 52358248118416921315💘1custom 52134489041079042481
Signed ㅤㅤㅤ ` ℋ𝒂𝒔𝒉𝒊
гордость семьи ❤️❤️
custom 52358248118416921317custom 52133967116653227242custom 52877175730796181391
Signed ㅤㅤㅤ ` ℋ𝒂𝒔𝒉𝒊
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hash1ii1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 36,601 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“хаши, не хаш” (@hash1ii1), 228 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hash1ii1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.