File, posted without a caption
❤5👍3
Signed ...
Channel
@hasan_jahanshahlouu
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
555subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001233405764 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hasan_jahanshahlouu |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hasan_jahanshahlouu |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 555 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 559 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 560 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 562 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 562 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
654 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 236 | 36.1% | |
| 👍 | 177 | 27.1% | |
| 👏 | 64 | 9.79% | |
| 🤣 | 36 | 5.50% | |
| 😐 | 24 | 3.67% | |
| 😢 | 22 | 3.36% | |
| 💯 | 21 | 3.21% | |
| 👌 | 13 | 1.99% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 1.99% | |
| 💔 | 9 | 1.38% | |
| 🤷 | 8 | 1.22% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 0.917% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.765% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 0.765% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.612% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.459% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 0.459% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 0.306% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.153% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.153% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.153% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 654 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 November 2024 to 21 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
File, posted without a caption
❤5👍3
Signed ...
با خود انديشه كردم در شب يلدا برا همراهان خودم از كدامين درد زياد و يا خوشي كم اين شب ها بگويم مثل هميشه متوسل شدم به حافظ كتاب را گشودم اين امد شما هم قبل از دانلود فايل تفالي كنيد
❤22😢3👌1
Signed ...
قيمت اين دسته گل تقريبا معادل سه ماه حقوق من با مدرك دكتري و ٢٥ سال سابقه كار قضايي است قطعا كساني كه قادر به خريد اين دسته گل هستند در اين كشور زندگي ميكنند https://t.me/hasan_jahanshahlouu و اينم فرمايش حضرت علي وَأَعْطِهِ مِنَ الْمَنْزِلَةِ لَدَيْکَ مَا لاَ يَطْمَعُ فِيهِ غَيْرُهُ مِنْ خَاصَّتِکَ، لِيَأْمَنَ بِذَلِکَ اغْتِيَالَ الرِّجَالِ لَهُ عِنْدَکَ. فَانْظُرْ فِي ذَلِکَ نَظَراً بَلِيغاً، ترجمه . و در بذل ما…
💔9😢5👍4😁2🤔1
Signed جهان
سلام بر همراهان عزيز قضات محترم وقت شعبه ١٤ تجديدنظر البرز در دعواي مطالبه خسارات دادرسي مبنا را قرارداد مالي وكيل و خواهان دعوا قرار داده است با در خواست اعمال ماده ٤٧٧ قانون ايين دادرسي كيفري با اعلام ورود ادعاي خلاف بين شرع قضات محترم ديوان راي اصداري اين شعبه را نقض و راي بر امكان مطالبه حق الوكاله وكيل به عنوان خسارات دادرسي را صرفا تا ميزان تعرفه دادند خلاصه اينكه قرارداد مالي وكيل و موكل بين هر دو معت…
👍10❤8
Signed جهان
به شدت اعتقاد داشتم عدم استماع دعوای الزام به ثبت چک در سامانه صیاد مخل حقوق دارنده با حسن نیت چک است با تنی چند از قضات محترم دیوان عالی نیز دیدگاهم را در میان گذاشتم تا اینکه رای وحدت رویه ظاهرا بر عدم قابلیت استماع این دعوا صادر شد بعضی از دوستان نیز پیام دادند که رای وحدت رویه مخالف نظر شما صادر و دست از لجاجت بردار اما یک جای کار ایراد داشت در رای وحدت رویه در صدر اول قید شده است ((درج عبارت صدور و پشت نویسی …
👍18❤11👏9👌5🙏1
Signed ...
به اين تصوير دقت كنيد
👍5❤1
Signed ...
سلام خيلي ساده و خلاصه بگم با راي وحدت رويه امروز كه از ديوان عالي كشور صادر شد چنانچه شما از خريدار بابت فروش كالاي خود چكي دريافت كنيد اگر صادر كننده چك را در سامانه صيادي ثبت نكند به اندازه يك كاغذ پاره ارزش دارد دليل اصلي از دست دادن كاركرد چك در معاملات تجاري بيگانه بودن قضات دادگستري با اين پديده هست چك در معاملات داخلي داشت اعتبار ميگرفت كه با اين راي مجددا اعتبار ان را لگد كوب كردند https://t.me/hasan_jahansh…
👍21👎3🤷3👌2😐2❤1🗿1😭1
Signed ...
Video, posted without a caption
❤25👍2
Signed جهان
ايا ميشود سر قاضي هم كلاه گذاشت سلام بر دوستان و همراهان خيلي ها تصور ميكنند چون قاضي و وكيل جماعت حقوق خواندند نميشود سرشان كلاه گذاشت اما بهتون بگم اين تصور اشتباهه الان از وقوع يك فريب به شدت رنج مي برم و از اينكه مالباخته هستم براي خودم متاسفم مدتي هست جابجايي محل سكونت داشتم در منزل جديد چون در طبقه پايين هستم هرچند اب دارم اما اينترنت همراه سخت متصل ميشود البته كه اون اب هم مثل برق بعضي وقتها قطع هست در سايت م…
👍20😢11😐7🤔3🤯3🤨1🤷1
Signed ...
سلام اقاي جمهوري اسلامي ١٢ روز پر از استرس بر اين كشور گذشت ما داغدار شديم وطن ما درد كشيد زخمي شد اما اين مردم بزرگ اين مردم نجيب اين مردم عشق نگذاشتند دشمن ايران به ارزوي خودش كه تجزيه ايران هست دست يابد خيلي دم از دوستي با مردم ايران زد اما انقدر اگاه و عاقل هستند كه بدانند از نتانياهو براي ايران دوستي بر نمي ايد من اعتقادم بر اين است كه ضربه خورديم خيلي هم بد ضربه خورديم اما دشمن را شكست داديم چون نگذاشتيم…
❤41👍6👏2
Signed ...
من عاشق تو هستم و عاشقت خواهم ماند هيچ كس را حتي عزيزانم را اندازه تو دوست ندارم برايت ارزوهاي زيادي دارم صلح با تو باشد خنده بر لبان مردمانت نشيند وجودت از خائنين و مزدوران پاك باشد كه هر بلايي در تاريخ بر سرت امد از خيانت بود اما اميد دارم به تو چون تجربه ثابت كرده است تو ماندگار ترين خاك دنيايي . مي ماني وطن حتي اگر زخم هاي به اعماق خزر بر وجودت نشسته باشد https://t.me/hasan_jahanshahlouu
❤26👍2
Signed ...
ما داغداريم https://t.me/hasan_jahanshahlouu
❤6👍2
Signed ...
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hasan_jahanshahlouu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دلنوشته هاي يك قاضي” (@hasan_jahanshahlouu), 555 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hasan_jahanshahlouu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.