Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Подвал Хару

@harupes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

165subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001694776475
TypeChannel
Username@harupes
DescriptionЯ каменщик работаю три дняЯААААААА https://t.me/haruchannn
Created26 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/harupes

Growth

1657 Aug 2026, 12:25 — 165 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 16:01 — 165 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:258 Aug 2026, 16:01
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 164–166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 16:01165no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:25165first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.3%
avg views ÷ 165 subscribers
Avg views / post
61.6
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held10 (27 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total616
Reactions total84
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,660
Videos
487
Links
179

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

84 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2428.6%
💋1315.5%
🥰1113.1%
❤‍🔥89.52%
🔥78.33%
custom 532577516662031516767.14%
🤯67.14%
😱55.95%
🏆22.38%
👾11.19%
🦄11.19%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC16 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥2

8 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC33 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не хватает пива и чипсов

custom 53257751666203151675🥰43

6 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC49 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Прости, брат.....

🤯6😱5🏆21💋1🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC50 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mokachinnewVideo

Ну все, осталась последняя репетиция перед Ковровом 🤧 Вышло достаточно приколдэсно на мой вкус, а главное нишево! Сикс севен

2💋2

5 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC90 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Аникон 💭💭💭💭 Кстати я была на нем, да 2 недели отсыпалась, думаю пока вкинуться фотками. В этом году без нервов, все было очень лампово и забавно, спасибо🎸 За фото со сцены спасибо @rin_chan_ph ,@castielophoto и https://vk.ru/varbulaynen

🥰64🔥4❤‍🔥1💋1custom 53257751666203151671

5 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC65 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Но если честно, вся эта тема меня дико вдохновляет... моментами сложно, но результат огнище Микан, жди 🤪🤪🤪

3❤‍🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC64 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я хз даже как это всё адекватно анонсить У меня марафон за неделю: Питер-Москва-Питер-Ковров-Москва-Питер

8💋7🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC49 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mokachinnew

Нам в очередной раз (уже убейте меня просто) нужна замена в номер. Аластор, костюм есть, весь дадим. Выступление в Нижнем Новгороде 22 августа. Надо за 4 репетиции с 0 выучить номер на 8 минут, центральный парт с танцами Изи, скажите? Раз плюнуть. Любой справится. 18+ мск @mokachinchin

2

27 Jul 2026, 05:35 UTC102 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @leonhard_cosPhoto

Заявки на вайбкон сданы! Завидуйте Хару, у неё есть фурри жена

❤‍🔥3💋21👾1🦄1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @harupes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 670,854 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Подвал Хару” (@harupes), 165 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/harupes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.