Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ℍ𝕒𝕣𝕣𝕪 ℙ𝕠𝕥𝕥𝕖𝕣 ℕ𝕖𝕨𝕤

Channel

ℍ𝕒𝕣𝕣𝕪 ℙ𝕠𝕥𝕥𝕖𝕣 ℕ𝕖𝕨𝕤

@harrypotnews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

258subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001974630413
TypeChannel
Username@harrypotnews
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/harrypotnews

Growth

25826025914 August 2026 — 260 subscribers15 August 2026 — 259 subscribers30 August 2026 — 258 subscribers14 August 202630 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 16 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 258–260 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 05:58258-1
15 Aug 2026, 17:25259-1
14 Aug 2026, 14:16260first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 7 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

108 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52828031856001787642624.1%
2523.1%
❤‍🔥2422.2%
custom 523094020137052624298.33%
custom 532593853858632078587.41%
💋54.63%
🥴54.63%
😁21.85%
😢21.85%
10.926%
🔥10.926%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2025 to 9 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @harrypotnews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 June 2025 to 9 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Jul 2025, 09:46 UTC≈3,970 views10 reactions2 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

✨ Ꭰᴩуɜья, нᴀбᴏᴩ ʙ ʙᴏᴧɯᴇбную ɯᴋᴏᴧу Ꮱᴏᴦʙᴀᴩᴛᴄ ʙнᴏʙь ᴏᴛᴋᴩыᴛ! ✨ Ꮋᴀʍ ᴛᴩᴇбуюᴛᴄя учᴇниᴋи нᴀ ᴄᴧᴇдующиᴇ ɸᴀᴋуᴧьᴛᴇᴛы: 💚 Ꮯᴧиɜᴇᴩин: 5/7 💛 Пуɸɸᴇндуй: 6/7 ❤️ Ꮁᴩиɸɸиндᴏᴩ: 5/7 Ꮋᴀᴨиɯиᴛᴇ ʙ ᴧичныᴇ ᴄᴏᴏбщᴇния ᴄʙᴏᴇй ᴄᴏʙᴇ (@Dracon_Malf), чᴛᴏбы ᴨᴏᴄᴋᴏᴩᴇᴇ нᴀчᴀᴛь ᴏбучᴇниᴇ ʍᴀᴦии! ✉️ Ждᴇʍ ᴋᴀждᴏᴦᴏ ʙ нᴀɯᴇй ʍᴀᴧᴇньᴋᴏй ᴄᴇʍьᴇ! 🫶🏻

10

10 Jun 2025, 16:24 UTC≈3,510 views15 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @gaarry_potterPhoto

⚡️📺Подтвержден дальнейший кастинг для оригинального сериала HBO о Гарри Поттере. Молли Уизли, Драко и Люциус Малфой, Симус Финниган, Парвати Патил, Лаванда Браун, мистер и миссис Дурсль и Корнелиус Фадж официально утверждены на роли! Семья волшебного мира становится больше с каждым днем. Теперь подтвердили участие в съемках новой группы фантастических талантов для сериала HBO Original Harry Potter: от ведьм и волш

6🥴5😢2🔥1custom 52828031856001787641

7 Jun 2025, 17:05 UTC≈2,430 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🌟Ꮶᴀᴋᴏй ᴄᴇᴦᴏдня нᴇʙᴇᴩᴏяᴛнᴏ ᴋᴩᴀᴄиʙый ɜᴀᴋᴀᴛ! Пᴏᴧуʍнᴀ ᴩᴀᴄᴄᴋᴀɜᴀᴧᴀ ʍнᴇ ᴧᴇᴦᴇнду ᴏ ᴛᴏʍ, чᴛᴏ нᴀɯи уʍᴇᴩɯиᴇ ᴩᴏдᴄᴛʙᴇнниᴋи ᴩᴀᴄᴋᴩᴀɯиʙᴀюᴛ дᴧя нᴀᴄ нᴇбᴏ ʙ ᴄᴀʍыᴇ ᴋᴩᴀᴄиʙыᴇ цʙᴇᴛᴀ 🌸 🌙 🌟Эх ᴧᴀднᴏ, нᴇ будᴇʍ ᴏ ᴦᴩуᴄᴛнᴏʍ 💕💋 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🌟Ꭰᴏбᴩᴏй нᴏчи, ʙᴏᴧɯᴇбниᴋи! 😁! ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖

custom 528280318560017876441

7 Jun 2025, 15:06 UTC≈2,040 views18 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✨🤩 Ᏼᴛᴏᴩᴀя чᴀᴄᴛь ᴀᴄᴄᴏциᴀций ᴨᴇᴩᴄᴏнᴀжᴇй иɜ Ꮁᴀᴩᴩи Пᴏᴛᴛᴇᴩᴀ ᴄ ᴨᴏᴦᴏдныʍи яʙᴧᴇнияʍи 🤩✨ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ #эстетика 🌟🌟ℍ𝕒𝕣𝕣𝕪 ℙ𝕠𝕥𝕥𝕖𝕣 ℕ𝕖𝕨𝕤🌟🌟

custom 528280318560017876464custom 53259385385863207854❤‍🔥21custom 52309402013705262421

7 Jun 2025, 13:02 UTC≈1,460 views9 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥4💋2😁21

7 Jun 2025, 13:02 UTC≈1,400 views14 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52828031856001787644custom 53259385385863207854💋3custom 523094020137052624221

7 Jun 2025, 13:02 UTC≈1,360 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃 🍃🍃 Пᴏᴩᴀдуᴇʍ ʙᴀᴄ ᴄᴛиᴋᴇᴩᴨᴀᴋᴀʍи ᴄ ᴧюбиʍыʍ Ꭲᴇᴏдᴏᴩᴏʍ Ꮋᴏᴛᴛᴏʍ 🍃🍃 🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃 #стикеры 🌟🌟ℍ𝕒𝕣𝕣𝕪 ℙ𝕠𝕥𝕥𝕖𝕣 ℕ𝕖𝕨𝕤🌟🌟

❤‍🔥62

7 Jun 2025, 11:06 UTC≈2,250 views11 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ❤️🐾Ꮞᴛᴏ нᴀᴄчᴇᴛ нᴏʙых ᴨᴀᴩных ᴀʙᴀᴛᴀᴩᴏᴋ? 🌕❤️ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ #авы 🌟🌟ℍ𝕒𝕣𝕣𝕪 ℙ𝕠𝕥𝕥𝕖𝕣 ℕ𝕖𝕨𝕤🌟🌟

custom 52828031856001787646❤‍🔥3custom 52309402013705262422

7 Jun 2025, 09:06 UTC≈1,040 views18 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Ꭺ чᴛᴏ, ᴇᴄᴧи бы ᴨᴇᴩᴄᴏнᴀжи иɜ ϶ᴩы ʍᴀᴩᴏдᴇᴩᴏʙ ᴄᴛᴀᴧи ᴋуᴋᴧᴀʍи? 🌟💜 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🐳 Ꮶуᴨиᴧи бы ᴛᴀᴋиᴇ? 🐳 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ #арты 🌟🌟ℍ𝕒𝕣𝕣𝕪 ℙ𝕠𝕥𝕥𝕖𝕣 ℕ𝕖𝕨𝕤🌟🌟

❤‍🔥9custom 52828031856001787645custom 52309402013705262424

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @harrypotnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,376,827 of 1,629,403 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Рецепты 🧑‍🍳| Десерты Супы Закуски
@Kulinar9 · 89,650
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ℍ𝕒𝕣𝕣𝕪 ℙ𝕠𝕥𝕥𝕖𝕣 ℕ𝕖𝕨𝕤” (@harrypotnews), 258 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/harrypotnews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.