Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Гарольдовские чтения

@haroldread

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

908subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002071771518
TypeChannel
Username@haroldread
DescriptionКонференция, посвященная современному психоанализу
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/haroldread

Growth

9087 Aug 2026, 21:19 — 908 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:02 — 908 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 21:198 Aug 2026, 01:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 907–909 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 01:02908no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:19908first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.2%
avg views ÷ 908 subscribers
Avg views / post
320
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held17 (15 May 202628 July 2026)
Views total320
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
145
Videos
2
Links
103

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

590 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
30651.9%
🔥14424.4%
👍7913.4%
🥰203.39%
❤‍🔥122.03%
👏81.36%
😍71.19%
🐳40.678%
🙏40.678%
🤝30.508%
🤓20.339%
👌10.169%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 590reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 18:16 UTC320 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @confpsychoanalysisPhoto

Коллеги, продолжаем представлять вам доклады нашей конференции 5 и 6 сентября! ❤ Спикер, обладающий колоссальным практическим опытом и всегда открывающий новые его грани, на этот раз — в сновидениях! Ян Федоров, кандидат медицинских наук, психоаналитический психотерапевт, группаналитик, психиатр, супервизор РПА 🐱 Доклад: Дорога к царским ресурсам Каждая психоаналитическая теория заранее знает, что она ищет в снов

8🔥7👍3

14 Jul 2026, 17:18 UTC586 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @confpsychoanalysisPhoto

ОТКРЫТА РЕГИСТРАЦИЯ НА ГРАНИ БЕССОЗНАТЕЛЬНОГО «Толкование сновидений есть королевская дорога к познанию бессознательного в душевной жизни» — писал Фрейд. Прошло больше ста лет, а по этой дороге по-прежнему идут аналитики, следуя за снами, фантазиями и символами своих пациентов ⭐ Приглашаем пройти по ней вместе. Открыта регистрация на Международную психоаналитическую конференцию «Грани бессознательного: сны, фантаз

14🔥3🥰2

11 Jun 2026, 15:43 UTC900 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На нашем канале появилась запись заключительного доклада нашей конференции – Дэн Гилхули «Я проснулся мёртвым»: https://youtu.be/NO-wv1_HslM Доклад также можно посмотреть по ссылке: https://disk.yandex.ru/i/SG1i-Fse4jnSGw

16🔥10👍3

10 Jun 2026, 06:55 UTC936 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На нашем канале появилась запись панельной дискуссии с Джейн Снайдер, Уильямом Шарпом, Мелиссой Скепко «Любовь, ненависть и становление психоаналитика»: https://youtu.be/CAJDI5hgFBo Дискуссию также можно посмотреть по ссылке: https://disk.yandex.ru/i/A21-jmzAk1-Jyg

10❤‍🔥2👍2😍1

7 Jun 2026, 16:33 UTC≈1,020 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На нашем канале появился доклад Данилы Бутакова «Трудно быть Богом»: https://youtu.be/p4DHAzzvI1Q Доклад также можно посмотреть по ссылке: https://disk.yandex.ru/i/B7yeD_to3xCL2w

16👍7🔥5

5 Jun 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,240 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На нашем канале появился доклад Елены Леонидовны Коробовой «Доэдипальные чувства контрпереноса: время любить или время ненавидеть?»: https://youtu.be/3IXHmSBmttQ Также доклад можно посмотреть по ссылке: https://disk.yandex.ru/i/gZOXl7-3FSq0sQ

15👍6🔥6👏2

4 Jun 2026, 15:02 UTC873 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На нашем канале появился доклад Екатерины Белокосковой-Михайловой «Кушетка и круг»: https://youtu.be/kpuMsrYbIuM Доклад также можно посмотреть по ссылке: https://disk.yandex.ru/i/S3-g9H4QbWyeIw

👍124🔥3

2 Jun 2026, 19:48 UTC≈1,110 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На нашем канале появился доклад Елены и Евгения Беловых «Искушения современного анализа. От гордыни к смирению»: https://youtu.be/gd3dWz2PxHc Доклад также можно посмотреть по ссылке: https://disk.yandex.ru/i/AlUmdEkRzz3bLA

19❤‍🔥5👍5🔥5🤓2

1 Jun 2026, 17:26 UTC879 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На нашем канале появился доклад Ренаты Уракчеевой «Тихое свидетельство: присутствие аналитика с невозможным и невыносимым»: https://youtu.be/yKix59hRga4 Также доклад можно посмотреть по ссылке: https://disk.yandex.ru/i/a5w313-JgdIoPg

🔥1310❤‍🔥4👌1👍1

31 May 2026, 15:15 UTC951 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На нашем канале появился доклад Алексея Распопова «Работа на краю проговариваемого: пределы аналитической устойчивости в сужающемся пространстве»: https://youtu.be/ptzmNfyoPSo Также доклад можно посмотреть по ссылке: https://disk.yandex.ru/i/DPzf-joXLpJQaw

👍14🔥96❤‍🔥1

30 May 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,400 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На нашем канале появился доклад Татьяны Яковенко «Мы в город изумрудный идём дорогой трудной»: https://youtu.be/fn3pipeXIF4 Также доклад можно посмотреть по ссылке: https://disk.yandex.ru/i/E6xmRJkwSBSqUA Приятного просмотра!

13🔥12👍5👏2

29 May 2026, 16:04 UTC928 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На нашем канале появилась запись доклада Златы Мацкевич и Константина Буланова «Психоанализ головного мозга, или Невозможность получать удовольствие от приёма "психоанализов"»: https://youtu.be/2FFjsT2IBs8 Доклад также можно посмотреть по ссылке: https://disk.yandex.ru/i/82kZZFmj12ILHQ Приятного просмотра!

23🥰8🔥5👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @haroldread. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гарольдовские чтения” (@haroldread), 908 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/haroldread.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.