Котята, я тут а поиске вдохновения. Покидайте, пожалуйста, песни, которые у вас с бифлифами ассоциируются!
❤🔥21custom 54295926350628976216custom 52739664407125204734

Channel
@harinezumiart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
705subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001955632232 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @harinezumiart |
| Created | 2 October 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/harinezumiart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 705 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 706 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 708 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 710 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 710 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,130 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 603 | 53.4% | |
| 🔥 | 248 | 21.9% | |
| custom 5429592635062897621 | 164 | 14.5% | |
| custom 5273966440712520473 | 115 | 10.2% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @harinezumiart. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 April 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Котята, я тут а поиске вдохновения. Покидайте, пожалуйста, песни, которые у вас с бифлифами ассоциируются!
❤🔥21custom 54295926350628976216custom 52739664407125204734
Черно-белая эра продолжается, и сегодня на повестке Фаенон) Мне нравится универсальность графичных материалов, они занимают минимум места, ими можно рисовать буквально везде, поэтому в поездки обычно беру именно их
❤🔥44custom 542959263506289762112🔥9custom 52739664407125204734
Как-то у меня на канале уже был китайский триптих, теперь пришла очередь горного. Три картинки, вдохновленные моей отпускной поездкой. Последнюю я рисовала еще в поезде, поэтому на ней изображен рандомный пейзаж, а вот на первых двух - зарисовки видов, которые во время похода запали мне в душу. Это дорога к Дуккинским озерам на Северном Кавказе - с чистой горной речкой, непролазными скалами и цветущим рододендроном …
🔥33❤🔥22custom 527396644071252047314custom 54295926350628976214
У пацанов был отпуск мечты (им даже ходить в горы не приходится, их приносят)
🔥41❤🔥22custom 542959263506289762115
Отпускное ⛰️ Админ проводит время в горах, поэтому и на картинках горы🥰
❤🔥53🔥20custom 542959263506289762114
Поймала связь в поезде, так что поделюсь тем что нарисовала в дороге)
🔥58❤🔥22custom 52739664407125204737
Если я вас уже достала Дань Хэном то потерпите ахахах Картинка в хорошем качестве, а файлик в комментах Забыла нарисовать дракону усы, пришлось изгаляться в фотошопе
❤🔥60🔥21custom 542959263506289762111custom 52739664407125204731
А вот и готовая картина с любимым дракошей - самая большая из всех что я рисовала. Пока что только фотография для понимания масштаба, скоро принесу в хорошем качестве ❤️ Поглажки автора приветствуются!!!
❤🔥69custom 542959263506289762125🔥18custom 52739664407125204733
Простите но я буду спамить этой картиной потому что она получается офигенной, и если вы не шарите за хср то вам придётся зашарить!
❤🔥63custom 527396644071252047321custom 542959263506289762121🔥5
Я пришла сказать что я жива и что пытаюсь выбраться из артблока, так что начала новую большую картину с Пожирателем Луны! Это пока только лайн, а сама картинка получится довольно большой: я взяла холст размером 30х70 см ❤️🔥 (Я говорила что Кафку рисовать было сложно? Забудьте. Костюм Дани вгоняет меня с экзистенциальный ужас)
custom 527396644071252047350❤🔥28🔥11custom 54295926350628976211
ну что ребятки картиночка в зин готова, и она получилась весьма хорошо Теперь вы сможете увидеть ее целиком не раньше осени но если хотите раньше то покупайте зин!!!! #wip_tgsf_fanzine
❤🔥75🔥20custom 542959263506289762112
Posted without readable text
custom 542959263506289762142❤🔥23
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @harinezumiart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 577,672 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Harinezumi лечит кукуху” (@harinezumiart), 705 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/harinezumiart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.