Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Характерство

Channel

Характерство

@harakterstvo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

709subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001302849253
TypeChannel
Username@harakterstvo
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/harakterstvo

Growth

709710709.510 August 2026 — 710 subscribers10 August 2026 — 710 subscribers17 August 2026 — 709 subscribers10 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 709–710 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 14:16709-1
10 Aug 2026, 20:41710no change
10 Aug 2026, 13:31710first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 3 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.2%
avg views ÷ 709 subscribers
Avg views / post
221
1 post measured
Reaction rate
15.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held15 (3 April 202623 July 2026)
Views total221
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 14s
Average length
3m 07s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

242 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥13053.7%
👍4317.8%
3213.2%
👌208.26%
💔72.89%
41.65%
😢20.826%
🙏20.826%
10.413%
🤡10.413%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 18:21 UTC221 views35 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @oko_gora

⚠️InformNapalm: В результате когнитивного воздействия и кибернетического вмешательства Украине удалось заставить российских операторов ПВО сбить свой же Су-57 в Московской области.

👌208🔥7

27 Jun 2026, 19:58 UTC591 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @informnapalmVideo

🔥 OSINT огляд InformNapalm про «Титан-Барикади»: «Фламінго» прилетіли по заводу, який сам хвалився у мережі своїм значним внеском у російську ракетну програму. Сьогодні зранку українські ракети FP-5 «Фламінго» успішно уразили російське підприємство «Титан-Барикади» у Волгограді. Це один із важливих вузлів ракетно-артилерійської інфраструктури РФ. За даними порталу ГУР War&Sanctions, АТ «ФНПЦ “Титан-Барикади”» спеці

10👍8

22 Jun 2026, 09:22 UTC565 views25 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ukraine_contextVideo

Обʼєктивний контроль ураження заводу «Сборка», який виробляє деталі для ЗРК «Панцир», ракет «Іскандер-К» та Х-101.

🔥20👍5

14 May 2026, 19:15 UTC919 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @war_homePhoto

Київ 14.05.2026 - фугасна бойова частина крилатої ракети Х-101 в квартирі житлового будинку Комусь неймовірно пощастило

👍15😢21

1 May 2026, 12:56 UTC885 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @informnapalmPhoto

Сьогодні Генеральний Штаб ЗСУ повідомив, що 25.04.2026 на аеродромі Шагол у Челябінській області (55°15'36.7"N 61°17'31.0"E) тимчасово існуючої РФ воїни Сил безпілотних систем ЗСУ уразили декілька винищувачів Су-57 та винищувач-бомбардувальник Су-34. Цілі знаходились на відстані близько 1700 км від держкордону України, ступінь пошкоджень уточнюється. В контексті цієї чудової новини нагадаємо, що рівно 10 років том

🔥22👍1

1 May 2026, 12:54 UTC609 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @exilenova_plusPhoto

Візуальне підтвердження по ураженню літаків Су-57 та Су-34 на аеродромі Шагол у Челябінській області. 1700 км від держкордону України.

🔥17

1 May 2026, 12:27 UTC542 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @GeneralStaffZSUPhoto

⚡️⚡️Уражено літаки Су-57 та Су-34 Підтверджено результати заходів зі зниження можливостей противника завдавати ударів по цивільних об'єктах на території України. ⚡️Так, 25.04.2026 на аеродромі Шагол у Челябінській області рф воїнами Сил безпілотних систем ЗСУ було уражено декілька винищувачів Су-57 та винищувач-бомбардувальник Су-34. 🧐Ступінь пошкоджень уточнюється. Цілі знаходились на відстані близько 1700 км ві

🔥18👍1

29 Apr 2026, 18:42 UTC448 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @StrategicaviationTPhoto

🛵 Загалом на всіх пускових точках ударних БпЛА знаходиться понад 300 гаражів та 35 ангарів, а також майже 50 пускових установок. Для запусків ударних БпЛА по території України використовують 44 пускові установки, а саме: ◽️ 8х з н.п. Цимбулова, Орловська область; ◽️ 8х з ае «Приморсько-Ахтарськ», Краснодарський край; ◽️ 6х з ае «Халіно», Курська область; ◽️ 5х з ае «Донецьк», т.о.Донецька область; ◽️ 4х з ае «Шатал

🔥422

17 Apr 2026, 06:32 UTC548 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @DniproOfficialPhoto

❤️ Невелике нагадування, а як там живе Алабуга? А один з найбільших заводів з виробництва ударних БпЛА живе досить непогано. Посилаючись на супутникові знімки та додаткові джерела, можна припустити, що росіяни все ж таки закінчили будівництво корпусу «Синергия 10, Курчатов», в якому проходитимуть практику та теорію студенти, з практики, зокрема, й з збирання БПЛА. Також продовжується будівництво нового корпусу «Си

🔥10👍42

11 Apr 2026, 16:23 UTC724 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @kiber_boroshnoPhoto

Пожежа на території КнААЗ ім. Ю.А. Гагаріна (ПАО «Компанія «Сухой»), Комсомольськ-на-Амурі З наявних відео та повідомлень фіксується пожежа у цеху №46(50.597418,137.068525) Комсомольського авіаційного заводу - єдиного серійного виробника винищувачів Су-35С та Су-57 (виріб Т-50) Цех спеціалізується на виготовленні деталей з полімерних композиційних матеріалів (ПКМ) для Су-57: порядку 300 найменувань деталей, з яких

🔥20👍21

9 Apr 2026, 19:38 UTC581 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @oko_goraPhoto

❗ За 31 день марта на официальном канале Воздушных Сил Украины опубликовано 412 сообщений о пусках КАБ по разным областям страны. Используя такие косвенные данные, можно оценить примерный % пусков по областям, от общего числа за этот период: 🟢Запорожская обл. – 29,1%; 🟢Харьковская обл. – 21,4%; 🟢Донецкая обл. – 19,7%; 🟢Днепр. обл. – 16,7%; 🟢Сумская обл. – 12,6%; 🟢Херсонская обл. – 0,2%; 🟢Одесская обл. – 0,2%. Кажд

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @harakterstvo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 870,588 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Характерство” (@harakterstvo), 709 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/harakterstvo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.