Истории моих клиентов в 10 томах по 120 листов📚 1200 сессий 👨🏫
🔥9❤6🥰2⚡1💯1🤯1😱1

Channel
@happy_source
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
90subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001640331769 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @happy_source |
| Created | 28 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/happy_source |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 90 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 92 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:09 | 92 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 5 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
108 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 48.1% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 17.6% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 15.7% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 8.33% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.78% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.78% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.85% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.926% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.926% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.926% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2025 to 20 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @happy_source. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 April 2025 to 20 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Истории моих клиентов в 10 томах по 120 листов📚 1200 сессий 👨🏫
🔥9❤6🥰2⚡1💯1🤯1😱1
Пока мы на временной остановке - выбор есть всегда
🤣9🥰1😱1
Чувствуете ли Вы себя "иным"?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🧝♂️"Я не вписываюсь в этот мир" Такой запрос я часто слышу от клиентов. Есть также его разновидности: - меня никто не понимает - я чувствую, что не такой как все - в любой компании я как "белая ворона" - мне скучно от поверхностных тем - про меня говорят, что я "не от мира сего" 📖 На эту тему вспоминается сказка "Гадкий утёнок", где главный герой с рождения всячески пытался заслужить любовь окружения, но всё равно…
❤5🔥5👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5
Добрый день! Я сейчас провожу исследование своих сильных сторон и компетенций через взгляд со стороны чтобы понимать в каком направлении развиваться и быть более полезным для людей. Для этого провожу опрос всего из 13 вопросов. Буду рад, если примете участие и поделитесь своим мнением обо мне и скажете всё, что обо мне думаете 😅 Ссылка на опрос https://forms.yandex.ru/cloud/68da9c3e90fa7b079b97582f #опросы
❤3👌3
📙Исцеление книгой Можно ли прочитать книгу по психологии и "проработаться"? Я был уверен, что нет, но книга Дэвида Бёрнса "Хорошее настроение" изменила моё мнение. Теперь рекомендую её своим клиентам. Эта книга точно Вам поможет, если Вы регулярно сталкиваетесь с ситуациями, когда: - откладываете нужные дела на потом - тяжело выразить недовольство действиями человека - соглашаетесь на выполнение просьб без желания…
❤7🔥4
🌌 Теория Всего Физики пытаются создать Теорию Всего - такую теорию, которая объясняла бы все процессы во Вселенной. Пока же невозможно объяснить движение мышкой по столу и движение электронов в процессоре компьютера формулами, которые хоть где-то могли бы сойтись. Как будто это две параллельные Вселенные, которые никогда не пересекаются. Но как такое возможно, если они находятся в одной комнате?! ⚡️Подобное проис…
❤7👍5
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
"Шаман в джинсах" - так меня назвали коллеги после прошлого поста 😅 И действительно, в таком "наряде" можно увидеть противоречие между древним и современным, духовным и материальным. А можно увидеть и попытку их совмещения. Похожее противоречие есть и в самой психологии. Для исцеления ума, души и тела сейчас есть множество методов. Шаманские медитации или научный подход? 🤔 👉Психодинамические подходы С одной сторон…
❤8👍4
Чайная церемония и медитация В эти выходные провёл с коллегам-психологам чайную церемонию и медитацию в лесу 🍵🌲 Это было... тихо 🧘 Мы вдыхали воздух леса, соединяясь с природой. Внешней и своей внутренней. Вспоминали, что значит быть, а не делать. Чайная церемония и медитация - это два ритуала, где можно остановиться и встретиться с собой. 🌿 Зачем это психологам? Личность и состояние психолога - это инструмент тр…
❤5👍3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @happy_source. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Чувствуете ли Вы себя "иным"?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2025 to 20 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИСТОЧНИКИ СЧАСТЬЯ | Роман Василенко” (@happy_source), 90 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/happy_source.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.